Driving across Markets: An Analysis of a Human–Machine Interface in Different International Contexts

Information Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.3390/info15060349
Denise Sogemeier, Yannick Forster, Frederik Naujoks, J. Krems, Andreas Keinath
{"title":"Driving across Markets: An Analysis of a Human–Machine Interface in Different International Contexts","authors":"Denise Sogemeier, Yannick Forster, Frederik Naujoks, J. Krems, Andreas Keinath","doi":"10.3390/info15060349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The design of automotive human–machine interfaces (HMIs) for global consumers’ needs to cater to a broad spectrum of drivers. This paper comprises benchmark studies and explores how users from international markets—Germany, China, and the United States—engage with the same automotive HMI. In real driving scenarios, N = 301 participants (premium vehicle owners) completed several tasks using different interaction modalities. The multi-method approach included both self-report measures to assess preference and satisfaction through well-established questionnaires and observational measures, namely experimenter ratings, to capture interaction performance. We observed a trend towards lower preference ratings in the Chinese sample. Further, interaction performance differed across the user groups, with self-reported preference not consistently aligning with observed performance. This dissociation accentuates the importance of integrating both measures in user studies. By employing benchmark data, we provide insights into varied market-based perspectives on automotive HMIs. The findings highlight the necessity for a nuanced approach to HMI design that considers diverse user preferences and interaction patterns.","PeriodicalId":510156,"journal":{"name":"Information","volume":"94 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/info15060349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The design of automotive human–machine interfaces (HMIs) for global consumers’ needs to cater to a broad spectrum of drivers. This paper comprises benchmark studies and explores how users from international markets—Germany, China, and the United States—engage with the same automotive HMI. In real driving scenarios, N = 301 participants (premium vehicle owners) completed several tasks using different interaction modalities. The multi-method approach included both self-report measures to assess preference and satisfaction through well-established questionnaires and observational measures, namely experimenter ratings, to capture interaction performance. We observed a trend towards lower preference ratings in the Chinese sample. Further, interaction performance differed across the user groups, with self-reported preference not consistently aligning with observed performance. This dissociation accentuates the importance of integrating both measures in user studies. By employing benchmark data, we provide insights into varied market-based perspectives on automotive HMIs. The findings highlight the necessity for a nuanced approach to HMI design that considers diverse user preferences and interaction patterns.
跨市场驾驶:不同国际背景下的人机界面分析
为全球消费者设计汽车人机界面 (HMI),需要满足广大驾驶者的需求。本文包括基准研究,探讨了来自德国、中国和美国等国际市场的用户如何使用相同的汽车人机界面。在真实驾驶场景中,N = 301 名参与者(高级车主)使用不同的交互模式完成了多项任务。我们采用了多种方法,包括通过成熟的调查问卷来评估偏好度和满意度的自我报告方法,以及通过实验者评分来捕捉交互表现的观察方法。我们观察到,中国样本的偏好评分有降低的趋势。此外,不同用户群体的交互表现也不尽相同,自我报告的偏好与观察到的表现并不一致。这种差异凸显了在用户研究中整合两种测量方法的重要性。通过使用基准数据,我们深入了解了市场对汽车人机界面的不同看法。研究结果突出表明,人机界面设计必须考虑到不同用户的偏好和交互模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信