The efficacy and safety of ureteroscopic lithotripsy and flexible ureteroscopy with continuous anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs: a multicenter retrospective real-world study
Zi-Jie Xu, Chu-Jiang He, Jian-Wei Cao, Jian-Hong Wu, Da-Wei Wang, Jun Da, Dong-Liang Xu, Ming-Yue Tan, Xiao-Feng Gao, Yong-Han Peng, Jie Chen, Rong Chen, Peng-Fei Wu, Jun-Tao Jiang, Lei Chen, Shu-jie Xia, Yi Shao
{"title":"The efficacy and safety of ureteroscopic lithotripsy and flexible ureteroscopy with continuous anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs: a multicenter retrospective real-world study","authors":"Zi-Jie Xu, Chu-Jiang He, Jian-Wei Cao, Jian-Hong Wu, Da-Wei Wang, Jun Da, Dong-Liang Xu, Ming-Yue Tan, Xiao-Feng Gao, Yong-Han Peng, Jie Chen, Rong Chen, Peng-Fei Wu, Jun-Tao Jiang, Lei Chen, Shu-jie Xia, Yi Shao","doi":"10.1097/cu9.0000000000000250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) and flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) for treating patients on anticoagulant (AC) or antiplatelet (AP) medications.\n \n \n \n The study included 213 patients with urinary stones who underwent URL or fURS between January 2019 and October 2022 at the Shanghai Municipal Hospital Urology Specialist Alliance. Among these patients, 20 received AC therapy, 198 received AP therapy, and 5 received both AC and AP therapy. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the real-world management of antithrombotic drugs: the continuation group (n = 62), the discontinuation group (n = 91), and the discontinuation and bridge heparin group (n = 60). Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were compared between the 3 groups.\n \n \n \n Age, sex, body mass index, stone location, stone size, stone side, and residual fragments were not different among the groups. None of the patients received blood transfusions or had thromboembolic events, emergencies for gross hematuria, significant bleeding-related complications, or unplanned secondary ureteroscopic surgery. The mean duration of hospital stay of the continuation group (3.97 days) was significantly lower than that of the discontinuation group (5.99 days) and the discontinuation and bridge heparin group (5.75 days) (p < 0.001).\n \n \n \n URL and fURS can be performed safely and effectively in patients on AC or AP drugs, resulting in reduced duration of hospital stay.\n","PeriodicalId":39147,"journal":{"name":"Current Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/cu9.0000000000000250","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) and flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) for treating patients on anticoagulant (AC) or antiplatelet (AP) medications.
The study included 213 patients with urinary stones who underwent URL or fURS between January 2019 and October 2022 at the Shanghai Municipal Hospital Urology Specialist Alliance. Among these patients, 20 received AC therapy, 198 received AP therapy, and 5 received both AC and AP therapy. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the real-world management of antithrombotic drugs: the continuation group (n = 62), the discontinuation group (n = 91), and the discontinuation and bridge heparin group (n = 60). Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were compared between the 3 groups.
Age, sex, body mass index, stone location, stone size, stone side, and residual fragments were not different among the groups. None of the patients received blood transfusions or had thromboembolic events, emergencies for gross hematuria, significant bleeding-related complications, or unplanned secondary ureteroscopic surgery. The mean duration of hospital stay of the continuation group (3.97 days) was significantly lower than that of the discontinuation group (5.99 days) and the discontinuation and bridge heparin group (5.75 days) (p < 0.001).
URL and fURS can be performed safely and effectively in patients on AC or AP drugs, resulting in reduced duration of hospital stay.
本研究旨在评估输尿管镜碎石术(URL)和柔性输尿管镜碎石术(fURS)治疗服用抗凝剂(AC)或抗血小板(AP)药物患者的有效性和安全性。 该研究纳入了2019年1月至2022年10月期间在上海市立医院泌尿外科专科联盟接受URL或fURS治疗的213名泌尿系结石患者。其中,20 名患者接受了 AC 治疗,198 名患者接受了 AP 治疗,5 名患者同时接受了 AC 和 AP 治疗。根据抗血栓药物的实际管理情况,患者被分为3组:继续治疗组(62人)、停药组(91人)和停药并桥接肝素组(60人)。对 3 组患者的术中和术后结果进行了比较。 各组的年龄、性别、体重指数、结石位置、结石大小、结石侧和残留碎片均无差异。所有患者均未接受输血,也未发生血栓栓塞事件、严重血尿急诊、重大出血相关并发症或计划外二次输尿管镜手术。继续用药组的平均住院时间(3.97 天)明显低于停药组(5.99 天)和停药加桥接肝素组(5.75 天)(P < 0.001)。 使用 AC 或 AP 药物的患者可以安全有效地实施 URL 和 fURS,从而缩短住院时间。