Optimal Parameters for Gastric Electrical Stimulation Therapy for Long-Term Symptom Control in Patients with Gastroparesis

I. Sarosiek, Alexandra N. Willauer, Karina Espino, J. Sarosiek, G. Galura, Luis Alvarado, A. Dwivedi, Brian Davis, M. Bashashati, Richard McCallum
{"title":"Optimal Parameters for Gastric Electrical Stimulation Therapy for Long-Term Symptom Control in Patients with Gastroparesis","authors":"I. Sarosiek, Alexandra N. Willauer, Karina Espino, J. Sarosiek, G. Galura, Luis Alvarado, A. Dwivedi, Brian Davis, M. Bashashati, Richard McCallum","doi":"10.3390/gidisord6020037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) therapy is indicated for the treatment of drug-refractory gastroparesis (GP). However, the long-term effects of GES therapy on GP symptom control and identification of the optimal parameters to activate this long-term efficacy have not been investigated. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 57 GP patients who received GES and pyloroplasty (PP). The interrogation of the GES system and assessment of GP symptoms were conducted at the initiation of GES therapy and during follow-up visits. We determined the changes in GES parameters including voltage (V), impedance (I), and current (C). The outcome was total symptom score (TSS), which was measured by self-reported GP symptoms. Results: The mean age of patients was 44 (±14) years, and 72% were females. The etiology for GP was diabetes mellitus in 72% and idiopathic in 28%. The median duration of GES follow-up was 47 months (range 5–73) A significant decrease was found in individual symptom scores and the TSS (−10.8; 95%CI: −12.6, −9.08) compared to baseline scores (p < 0.0001). During follow-up, readings for I (515 vs. 598 Ω), V (3.3 vs. 4.8 V), and C (6.5 vs. 8.4 mA) significantly increased (p ≤ 0.0001 for all parameters). Higher GES settings were associated with lower TSS in the adjusted analysis (RC, −1.97; 95%CI: −3.81, −0.12, p = 0.037). Conclusions: these findings suggest that adjusting GES parameters over time based on optimizing symptom improvement should be incorporated into the long-term care of patients receiving gastric neurostimulation therapy.","PeriodicalId":507842,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/gidisord6020037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) therapy is indicated for the treatment of drug-refractory gastroparesis (GP). However, the long-term effects of GES therapy on GP symptom control and identification of the optimal parameters to activate this long-term efficacy have not been investigated. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 57 GP patients who received GES and pyloroplasty (PP). The interrogation of the GES system and assessment of GP symptoms were conducted at the initiation of GES therapy and during follow-up visits. We determined the changes in GES parameters including voltage (V), impedance (I), and current (C). The outcome was total symptom score (TSS), which was measured by self-reported GP symptoms. Results: The mean age of patients was 44 (±14) years, and 72% were females. The etiology for GP was diabetes mellitus in 72% and idiopathic in 28%. The median duration of GES follow-up was 47 months (range 5–73) A significant decrease was found in individual symptom scores and the TSS (−10.8; 95%CI: −12.6, −9.08) compared to baseline scores (p < 0.0001). During follow-up, readings for I (515 vs. 598 Ω), V (3.3 vs. 4.8 V), and C (6.5 vs. 8.4 mA) significantly increased (p ≤ 0.0001 for all parameters). Higher GES settings were associated with lower TSS in the adjusted analysis (RC, −1.97; 95%CI: −3.81, −0.12, p = 0.037). Conclusions: these findings suggest that adjusting GES parameters over time based on optimizing symptom improvement should be incorporated into the long-term care of patients receiving gastric neurostimulation therapy.
胃肠电刺激疗法用于长期控制胃痉挛患者症状的最佳参数
背景:胃电刺激疗法(GES)适用于治疗药物难治性胃瘫(GP)。然而,GES疗法对GP症状控制的长期效果以及激活这种长期疗效的最佳参数尚未得到研究。方法:我们对 57 名接受 GES 和幽门成形术 (PP) 的 GP 患者进行了回顾性队列分析。在开始接受 GES 治疗时和随访期间,我们对 GES 系统进行了检查,并对 GP 症状进行了评估。我们测定了 GES 参数的变化,包括电压 (V)、阻抗 (I) 和电流 (C)。治疗结果为症状总分(TSS),通过自我报告的 GP 症状进行测量。研究结果患者平均年龄为 44(±14)岁,72% 为女性。72%患者的GP病因为糖尿病,28%为特发性。GES 随访时间的中位数为 47 个月(5-73 个月)。与基线分数相比,单个症状分数和 TSS(-10.8;95%CI:-12.6,-9.08)均有显著下降(p < 0.0001)。在随访期间,I(515 vs. 598 Ω)、V(3.3 vs. 4.8 V)和C(6.5 vs. 8.4 mA)读数显著增加(所有参数的 p 均小于 0.0001)。在调整分析中,较高的 GES 设置与较低的 TSS 相关(RC,-1.97;95%CI:-3.81,-0.12,p = 0.037)。结论:这些研究结果表明,在接受胃神经刺激治疗的患者的长期护理中,应根据症状改善的最佳情况逐步调整 GES 参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信