The Impact of an Educational 3D Virtual Reality Video Method on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: First Results

E. Kildušis, G. Brimas
{"title":"The Impact of an Educational 3D Virtual Reality Video Method on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: First Results","authors":"E. Kildušis, G. Brimas","doi":"10.15388/lietchirur.2024.23(2).4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. Adequate bowel preparation is essential for diagnostic, screening, surveillance, and therapeutic colonoscopy. 3D virtual reality (3D-VR) has the characteristics of depth, interactivity and visuality and is widely used in medicine, so it can be used for patient education and training. The aim of our study is to determine the impact of using 3D virtual reality video for patients education on bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Materials and methods. A prospective, blind, randomized clinical trial was launched at the Republican Vilnius University Hospital (RVUL) on 07.03.2021, which included 50 outpatients who had indications for colonoscopy until 28.02.2022. Patients were randomly assigned to control and experimental groups. The first group was given the bowel preparation information in the standard form used by RVUL – in writing, and the second – in a 3D virtual reality video. The content of the information provided to both groups was the same. The quality of bowel preparation was assessed based on the Boston and Ottawa bowel preparation scales. Results. Of the 50 outpatients who participated in the study, 26 were assigned to the control group, 24 to the study group. The patients of both groups were identical in terms of sex, age, body mass index, comorbidities. The mean (SD) BBPS score was statistically significantly lower in the control group compared to the 3D-VR video group (5.96(±1) vs. 7.58(±1.47); p < 0.001). The mean (SD) scores of OBPS were higher in the control group (6.58(±2.44) than in the study group 1.83(±2.32); p < 0.001). The rate of adequate bowel preparation in the 3D-VR video group was higher than in the control group (18(69.23%) vs. 23(95.83%); the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.024)). The rate of terminal ileum intubation in the control group was 50% compared to 83.33% in the 3D-VR video group (p = 0.02).The mean (SD) colonoscopy time was statistically significantly shorter in the 3D-VR video group 23.04(±3.66) minutes and 16.5(±4.28) minutes, p = <0.001. Conclusions. Patients who were informed by 3D-VR method before colonoscopy had statistically significantly better bowel preparation, as well as reduced procedure time and possibly increased detection rates of polyps and adenomas.","PeriodicalId":52926,"journal":{"name":"Lietuvos Chirurgija","volume":"104 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lietuvos Chirurgija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/lietchirur.2024.23(2).4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. Adequate bowel preparation is essential for diagnostic, screening, surveillance, and therapeutic colonoscopy. 3D virtual reality (3D-VR) has the characteristics of depth, interactivity and visuality and is widely used in medicine, so it can be used for patient education and training. The aim of our study is to determine the impact of using 3D virtual reality video for patients education on bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Materials and methods. A prospective, blind, randomized clinical trial was launched at the Republican Vilnius University Hospital (RVUL) on 07.03.2021, which included 50 outpatients who had indications for colonoscopy until 28.02.2022. Patients were randomly assigned to control and experimental groups. The first group was given the bowel preparation information in the standard form used by RVUL – in writing, and the second – in a 3D virtual reality video. The content of the information provided to both groups was the same. The quality of bowel preparation was assessed based on the Boston and Ottawa bowel preparation scales. Results. Of the 50 outpatients who participated in the study, 26 were assigned to the control group, 24 to the study group. The patients of both groups were identical in terms of sex, age, body mass index, comorbidities. The mean (SD) BBPS score was statistically significantly lower in the control group compared to the 3D-VR video group (5.96(±1) vs. 7.58(±1.47); p < 0.001). The mean (SD) scores of OBPS were higher in the control group (6.58(±2.44) than in the study group 1.83(±2.32); p < 0.001). The rate of adequate bowel preparation in the 3D-VR video group was higher than in the control group (18(69.23%) vs. 23(95.83%); the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.024)). The rate of terminal ileum intubation in the control group was 50% compared to 83.33% in the 3D-VR video group (p = 0.02).The mean (SD) colonoscopy time was statistically significantly shorter in the 3D-VR video group 23.04(±3.66) minutes and 16.5(±4.28) minutes, p = <0.001. Conclusions. Patients who were informed by 3D-VR method before colonoscopy had statistically significantly better bowel preparation, as well as reduced procedure time and possibly increased detection rates of polyps and adenomas.
教育性 3D 虚拟现实视频方法对结肠镜检查前肠道准备工作的影响:初步结果
目的。充分的肠道准备对于诊断、筛查、监测和治疗结肠镜检查至关重要。三维虚拟现实(3D-VR)具有深度、交互性和可视性等特点,在医学中应用广泛,因此可用于患者教育和培训。我们的研究旨在确定使用三维虚拟现实视频对患者进行结肠镜检查前肠道准备教育的影响。材料和方法。维尔纽斯共和国大学医院(RVUL)于 2021 年 3 月 7 日启动了一项前瞻性、盲法、随机临床试验,其中包括 50 名有结肠镜检查指征的门诊患者,直至 2022 年 2 月 28 日。患者被随机分配到对照组和实验组。第一组以 RVUL 使用的标准形式(书面形式)获得肠道准备信息,第二组以 3D 虚拟现实视频的形式获得肠道准备信息。两组提供的信息内容相同。肠道准备的质量根据波士顿和渥太华肠道准备量表进行评估。结果。在参与研究的 50 名门诊患者中,26 人被分配到对照组,24 人被分配到研究组。两组患者在性别、年龄、体重指数、合并症等方面均相同。与 3D-VR 视频组相比,对照组的 BBPS 平均(标清)评分明显较低(5.96(±1) vs. 7.58(±1.47);P < 0.001)。对照组的 OBPS 平均(标清)得分(6.58(±2.44)分)高于研究组的 1.83(±2.32)分;P < 0.001)。3D-VR 视频组的充分肠道准备率高于对照组(18(69.23%)对 23(95.83%);差异有统计学意义(P = 0.024))。对照组的末端回肠插管率为 50%,而 3D-VR 视频组为 83.33%(p = 0.02)。3D-VR 视频组的平均(标清)结肠镜检查时间为 23.04(±3.66)分钟,对照组为 16.5(±4.28)分钟,差异有统计学意义(p = <0.001)。结论据统计,结肠镜检查前接受 3D-VR 方法检查的患者肠道准备工作明显更好,检查时间也更短,息肉和腺瘤的检出率也可能更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信