Effects of Failure Criteria on Quantitatively Determining the Machining Mechanics for CFRP with Different Tool Rake Angles

Chunlei Song, Xiaoliang Jin
{"title":"Effects of Failure Criteria on Quantitatively Determining the Machining Mechanics for CFRP with Different Tool Rake Angles","authors":"Chunlei Song, Xiaoliang Jin","doi":"10.1115/1.4065726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The machining mechanics of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) materials is influenced by the coupled effects of the workpiece anisotropy, tool edge geometry, and cutting parameters. Predicting the chip formation mechanism is crucial for optimizing cutting parameters, reducing tool wear, and improving efficiency and surface quality. This study quantitatively evaluates the effect of main CFRP failure criteria on the chip formation mechanism in modeling the machining mechanics of CFRP. The results show that the Hashin-Puck and Davila criteria excel at capturing chip formation across all fiber orientations because of the incorporation of ‘internal friction’ concept, while others only achieve accurate predictions in specific fiber orientation ranges due to improper shear strength consideration. The sources of the prediction similarities, differences, and limitations of failure criteria are experimentally validated. Sensitivity analyses quantitatively determine the effect of the tool rake angle on the machining energy consumption and cutting forces across the fiber orientation range. This research can be used to select the optimal failure criteria, design proper cutting tool geometry, and inform the cutting parameter choices for CFRP machining operations.","PeriodicalId":507815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The machining mechanics of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) materials is influenced by the coupled effects of the workpiece anisotropy, tool edge geometry, and cutting parameters. Predicting the chip formation mechanism is crucial for optimizing cutting parameters, reducing tool wear, and improving efficiency and surface quality. This study quantitatively evaluates the effect of main CFRP failure criteria on the chip formation mechanism in modeling the machining mechanics of CFRP. The results show that the Hashin-Puck and Davila criteria excel at capturing chip formation across all fiber orientations because of the incorporation of ‘internal friction’ concept, while others only achieve accurate predictions in specific fiber orientation ranges due to improper shear strength consideration. The sources of the prediction similarities, differences, and limitations of failure criteria are experimentally validated. Sensitivity analyses quantitatively determine the effect of the tool rake angle on the machining energy consumption and cutting forces across the fiber orientation range. This research can be used to select the optimal failure criteria, design proper cutting tool geometry, and inform the cutting parameter choices for CFRP machining operations.
失效标准对定量确定不同刀具斜角下 CFRP 加工力学性能的影响
碳纤维增强聚合物 (CFRP) 材料的加工力学受到工件各向异性、刀具边缘几何形状和切削参数的耦合影响。预测切屑形成机理对于优化切削参数、减少刀具磨损、提高效率和表面质量至关重要。本研究定量评估了 CFRP 主要失效准则对 CFRP 加工力学建模中切屑形成机理的影响。结果表明,Hashin-Puck 和 Davila 标准由于纳入了 "内摩擦 "概念,因此在捕捉所有纤维取向的切屑形成方面表现出色,而其他标准由于对剪切强度考虑不当,只能在特定纤维取向范围内实现精确预测。实验验证了失效标准的预测相似性、差异性和局限性的来源。灵敏度分析定量确定了刀具前角在整个纤维取向范围内对加工能耗和切削力的影响。这项研究可用于选择最佳失效标准、设计适当的切削刀具几何形状,并为 CFRP 加工操作的切削参数选择提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信