The Value of 2D Global Longitudinal Strain in Predicting the Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with NSTEMI and Unstable Angina and Regional Strain Value for Predicting the Culprit Artery

Kamal Haless, Eljazouli Ali, Haboub Meriem, Abdenasser Drighil, Habbal Rachida
{"title":"The Value of 2D Global Longitudinal Strain in Predicting the Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with NSTEMI and Unstable Angina and Regional Strain Value for Predicting the Culprit Artery","authors":"Kamal Haless, Eljazouli Ali, Haboub Meriem, Abdenasser Drighil, Habbal Rachida","doi":"10.9734/ca/2024/v13i3421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:  Our study aimed to evaluate the predictive ability of resting strain to determine the severity of CAD in the absence of impaired LVEF in patients with NSTEMI and unstable angina.  Additionally, the study sought to predict culprit and infracted related artery (IRA) using regional strain (SLR). \nMethods: The study was conducted between January 2023 and May 2023 at the cardiology department of Ibn Rochd Hospital, Morocco.  We conducted a comparative analysis involving 30 patients, comprising 23 individuals with NSTEMI and 7 with unstable angina. In all cases, we assessed both GLS and RLS before proceeding to coronary angiography. Subsequently, we categorized the patients into two groups: one consisted of 18 individuals with severe coronary lesions, including left main trunk (LM) and three vessels lesions, while the other group, comprising 12 patients, served as the control group and had non-severe coronary lesions \nResults: At resting GLS threshold below -16,3 %, despite its subnormal nature, should raise suspicion and suggest severe coronary artery disease.  RLS in the \"Single-vessel\" group was significantly lower in the culprit artery territories, suggesting that RLS may be a better marker for identifying the culprit artery. Both GLS and the visual analysis of segmental kinetics by WMSI (Wall Motion Score Index) at rest, were statistically significant for detecting severe coronary lesions. \nConclusion: GLR and SLR are sensitive markers for early detection of myocardial ischemia and predicting its severity. A resting GLR threshold of less than -16.13% could indicate severe CAD with severe tri-truncular or LMT damage, especially when combined with abnormal WMSI scores. These 2D strain parameter changes precede subjective abnormalities in segmental kinetics, which are often considered normal at rest.","PeriodicalId":505403,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology and Angiology: An International Journal","volume":"138 51","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology and Angiology: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ca/2024/v13i3421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Our study aimed to evaluate the predictive ability of resting strain to determine the severity of CAD in the absence of impaired LVEF in patients with NSTEMI and unstable angina.  Additionally, the study sought to predict culprit and infracted related artery (IRA) using regional strain (SLR). Methods: The study was conducted between January 2023 and May 2023 at the cardiology department of Ibn Rochd Hospital, Morocco.  We conducted a comparative analysis involving 30 patients, comprising 23 individuals with NSTEMI and 7 with unstable angina. In all cases, we assessed both GLS and RLS before proceeding to coronary angiography. Subsequently, we categorized the patients into two groups: one consisted of 18 individuals with severe coronary lesions, including left main trunk (LM) and three vessels lesions, while the other group, comprising 12 patients, served as the control group and had non-severe coronary lesions Results: At resting GLS threshold below -16,3 %, despite its subnormal nature, should raise suspicion and suggest severe coronary artery disease.  RLS in the "Single-vessel" group was significantly lower in the culprit artery territories, suggesting that RLS may be a better marker for identifying the culprit artery. Both GLS and the visual analysis of segmental kinetics by WMSI (Wall Motion Score Index) at rest, were statistically significant for detecting severe coronary lesions. Conclusion: GLR and SLR are sensitive markers for early detection of myocardial ischemia and predicting its severity. A resting GLR threshold of less than -16.13% could indicate severe CAD with severe tri-truncular or LMT damage, especially when combined with abnormal WMSI scores. These 2D strain parameter changes precede subjective abnormalities in segmental kinetics, which are often considered normal at rest.
二维全局纵向应变在预测 NSTEMI 和不稳定型心绞痛患者冠状动脉疾病严重程度中的价值以及区域应变在预测病源动脉中的价值
研究背景 我们的研究旨在评估静息应变在 NSTEMI 和不稳定型心绞痛患者 LVEF 未受损的情况下确定 CAD 严重程度的预测能力。 此外,该研究还试图利用区域应变(SLR)来预测罪魁祸首和相关动脉(IRA)的损伤程度。研究方法研究于 2023 年 1 月至 2023 年 5 月在摩洛哥 Ibn Rochd 医院心脏科进行。 我们对 30 名患者进行了比较分析,其中包括 23 名 NSTEMI 患者和 7 名不稳定型心绞痛患者。在所有病例中,我们在进行冠状动脉造影术前都评估了 GLS 和 RLS。随后,我们将患者分为两组:一组由 18 名严重冠状动脉病变患者组成,包括左主干(LM)和三支血管病变;另一组由 12 名患者组成,作为对照组,其冠状动脉病变并不严重:静息 GLS 临界值低于-16.3%,尽管其性质不正常,但仍应引起怀疑并提示严重的冠状动脉疾病。 单血管 "组的 RLS 在冠状动脉区域明显较低,这表明 RLS 可能是识别冠状动脉的更好标志。静息时的 GLS 和通过 WMSI(室壁运动评分指数)对节段动力学进行的视觉分析,对检测严重冠状动脉病变均有统计学意义。结论是GLR和SLR是早期发现心肌缺血并预测其严重程度的敏感指标。静息 GLR 阈值小于 -16.13% 可预示严重的 CAD,伴有严重的三冠状动脉或 LMT 损伤,尤其是在 WMSI 评分异常的情况下。这些二维应变参数变化先于节段动力学的主观异常,而节段动力学在静息时通常被认为是正常的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信