Systematic Review of Built Environment Attributes of Walkability: Cases of Malaysia

Khair Eddine Demdoum, Yazid Mohd Yunos, N. Ujang, N. Utaberta
{"title":"Systematic Review of Built Environment Attributes of Walkability: Cases of Malaysia","authors":"Khair Eddine Demdoum, Yazid Mohd Yunos, N. Ujang, N. Utaberta","doi":"10.54028/nj202423410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Walkability has gained considerable traction in recent years as a key concept for promoting sustainable urban environments and healthier lifestyles. Built environment attributes such as infrastructure, streetscape design, land use mix, and street connectivity were found to have a high impact on walking behavior. However, due to the context-specific nature of walkability, where attributes deemed important in one context may not hold the same significance in another, this study aims to examine walkability attributes and methods within the Malaysian context. The goal is to offer valuable insights for researchers and policymakers operating in similar contexts. This study employed a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of SCOPUS and Google Scholar identified and assessed studies related to walkability in Malaysia. Rigorous screening and application of inclusion criteria yielded 32 Malaysian articles published between 2011 and 2021 for detailed review. Data extraction focused on specified factors including data source, built environment attributes, unit of analysis, and type of walking. The results identified both similarities and differences in the influence of built environment attributes on walking behavior in Malaysia compared to global patterns. Micro-scale factors, such as the aesthetics and attractiveness of walkways (65%), and safety and security (59%), were found to be leading factors in creating walking-friendly environments. Conversely, macro-level attributes, including density (15%) and mixed land use (18%), did not show a significant impact. This reliance on perceived assessments may struggle to capture the complexity of actual density and diversity, leading to inconsistent results. However, data collection and analysis approaches require further refinement. Future Malaysian research may prioritize the use of GIS-based walkability indexes to comprehensively measure walkability and improve the validity and accuracy of assessments. Additionally, consideration should be given to the regional transferability of these indexes.","PeriodicalId":502924,"journal":{"name":"Nakhara : Journal of Environmental Design and Planning","volume":"140 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nakhara : Journal of Environmental Design and Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54028/nj202423410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Walkability has gained considerable traction in recent years as a key concept for promoting sustainable urban environments and healthier lifestyles. Built environment attributes such as infrastructure, streetscape design, land use mix, and street connectivity were found to have a high impact on walking behavior. However, due to the context-specific nature of walkability, where attributes deemed important in one context may not hold the same significance in another, this study aims to examine walkability attributes and methods within the Malaysian context. The goal is to offer valuable insights for researchers and policymakers operating in similar contexts. This study employed a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of SCOPUS and Google Scholar identified and assessed studies related to walkability in Malaysia. Rigorous screening and application of inclusion criteria yielded 32 Malaysian articles published between 2011 and 2021 for detailed review. Data extraction focused on specified factors including data source, built environment attributes, unit of analysis, and type of walking. The results identified both similarities and differences in the influence of built environment attributes on walking behavior in Malaysia compared to global patterns. Micro-scale factors, such as the aesthetics and attractiveness of walkways (65%), and safety and security (59%), were found to be leading factors in creating walking-friendly environments. Conversely, macro-level attributes, including density (15%) and mixed land use (18%), did not show a significant impact. This reliance on perceived assessments may struggle to capture the complexity of actual density and diversity, leading to inconsistent results. However, data collection and analysis approaches require further refinement. Future Malaysian research may prioritize the use of GIS-based walkability indexes to comprehensively measure walkability and improve the validity and accuracy of assessments. Additionally, consideration should be given to the regional transferability of these indexes.
步行便利性的建筑环境属性系统回顾:马来西亚案例
近年来,步行能力作为促进可持续城市环境和更健康生活方式的一个重要概念,已经获得了相当大的关注。研究发现,基础设施、街景设计、土地利用组合和街道连通性等建筑环境属性对步行行为有很大影响。然而,由于步行能力具有因地制宜的特性,在一种环境中被认为重要的属性在另一种环境中可能并不具有同样的意义,因此本研究旨在考察马来西亚环境中的步行能力属性和方法。目的是为在类似情况下开展工作的研究人员和政策制定者提供有价值的见解。本研究按照 PRISMA 指南进行了系统性回顾。通过对 SCOPUS 和谷歌学术的全面搜索,确定并评估了与马来西亚步行能力相关的研究。经过严格筛选并应用纳入标准,对 2011 年至 2021 年间发表的 32 篇马来西亚文章进行了详细审查。数据提取侧重于特定因素,包括数据来源、建筑环境属性、分析单位和步行类型。结果发现,与全球模式相比,马来西亚的建筑环境属性对步行行为的影响既有相似之处,也有不同之处。研究发现,步行道的美观和吸引力(65%)以及安全和安保(59%)等微观因素是创造步行友好型环境的主要因素。相反,包括密度(15%)和土地混合使用(18%)在内的宏观属性并没有显示出显著的影响。这种对感知评估的依赖可能难以捕捉实际密度和多样性的复杂性,从而导致结果不一致。然而,数据收集和分析方法需要进一步完善。马来西亚未来的研究可能会优先考虑使用基于地理信息系统的步行能力指数来全面衡量步行能力,并提高评估的有效性和准确性。此外,还应考虑这些指数的区域可转移性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信