„Putler kaputt“: ajaloomeemid Vene sõja kohta Ukrainas / “Putler kaput”: Historical Memes About the Russian War in Ukraine

S. Troitskii, Guillem Castañar, Liisi Laineste, Anastasiya Fiadotava
{"title":"„Putler kaputt“: ajaloomeemid Vene sõja kohta Ukrainas / “Putler kaput”: Historical Memes About the Russian War in Ukraine","authors":"S. Troitskii, Guillem Castañar, Liisi Laineste, Anastasiya Fiadotava","doi":"10.7592/methis.v26i33.24138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teesid: Uurimuses analüüsitakse ajaloomeeme Vene sõja kohta Ukrainas. Leidsime materjalis korduvad motiivid ning vaatlesime suhteid meemide ajalooalasete viidete ja hoiakute vahel. Selgus, et ajaloomeemid võivad olla vahendiks, kuidas õigustada tänapäeva sündmusi, tekitada vaenlaste suhtes üleolekut, anda hinnanguid sündmustele ning naeruvääristada või tunnustada olukorraga seostuvaid inimesi. Analüüsides meemides ajaloolisi viiteid, tuleb arvestada hoiakute mõjuga viidete valikule. \n  \nOn 24 February 2022, Russia started the full-scale war in Ukraine. It provoked a lot of parallels with earlier conflicts in the vernacular reactions. There was an abundance of serious and humorous reactions and comments on the war, and the creation and dissemination of memes soared. Some of these used historical motives to underline the stance and message of the utterance. Historical memes are widely spread cultural units that explicitly relate to a particular historical event or personality. They are linked to memory practices that strengthen or help to propagate the meme. Historical memes reanimate the past with the help of historical artefacts (such as photos and videos), to adapt the memories of the past to the circumstances of the present. In times of war, or in any other conflict context, memoricity plays a significant role in narratives related to collective security and evokes affective responses by re-activating feelings associated with past experiences. Historical memes accentuate the emotional and intertextual load by tying contemporary commentary to emotionally charged historical and cultural motifs such as visual and/or verbal references to historical events, characters, catch phrases, etc. They function as shortcuts to basic categorisations of “us” and “them”, friends and enemies. \nOur aim is to analyse how historical motives contribute to the meaning-making in memes: which historical memes are commonly used in the context of the Russia–Ukraine conflict from 2014, which recurrent motifs transpire in the data, and what the relationship between the historical references and stance of the memes is. \nMemes offered a vernacular viewpoint on this conflict already since the illegal annexation of Crimea by Russia in 2014, and have been actively used throughout the years up to the ongoing military invasion. Some of the memes referred to (pre) historical events, but most of the references res ort to the history of 20th century. The motif of WWII was the most prevalent historical reference in memes on the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine that circulated in Ukraine, Russia and Belarus. While the references to ancient and mediaeval times are generally used to create a certain distance to the 2022 war and place its events and participants in a completely different context, references to the Russian Empire and WWII often draw direct parallels between historical and the contemporary events. \nThe instrumentalist approach to history that is consciously employed by the state can also function on a vernacular level by employing and recognising certain historical references in memes. The results show that historical memes can offer a way of legitimising contemporary events through history. The current actions and political decisions acquire firmness and justification if they are linked to historical events and actors that everyone remembers from school. They also contribute to establishing superiority over enemies, as the audiences find proof in their reasoning when they compare the past with the present. Memes ridicule or praise the people involved with the help of intertextuality pointing at well-known historical personae like Hitler, Goebbels or Stalin. In doing that, memes with historical references seem to demand a more nuanced cultural literacy, while other memes simply depend on the more basic shared cultural background of their creators and audiences to be understood and spread. Approaching historical memes from this angle, we can reveal the workings of intertextuality and their role in different kinds of memes, given that previous research has shown that not all the references and allusions need to be understood to find a meme funny. \n ","PeriodicalId":502972,"journal":{"name":"Methis. Studia humaniora Estonica","volume":"16 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methis. Studia humaniora Estonica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7592/methis.v26i33.24138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Teesid: Uurimuses analüüsitakse ajaloomeeme Vene sõja kohta Ukrainas. Leidsime materjalis korduvad motiivid ning vaatlesime suhteid meemide ajalooalasete viidete ja hoiakute vahel. Selgus, et ajaloomeemid võivad olla vahendiks, kuidas õigustada tänapäeva sündmusi, tekitada vaenlaste suhtes üleolekut, anda hinnanguid sündmustele ning naeruvääristada või tunnustada olukorraga seostuvaid inimesi. Analüüsides meemides ajaloolisi viiteid, tuleb arvestada hoiakute mõjuga viidete valikule.   On 24 February 2022, Russia started the full-scale war in Ukraine. It provoked a lot of parallels with earlier conflicts in the vernacular reactions. There was an abundance of serious and humorous reactions and comments on the war, and the creation and dissemination of memes soared. Some of these used historical motives to underline the stance and message of the utterance. Historical memes are widely spread cultural units that explicitly relate to a particular historical event or personality. They are linked to memory practices that strengthen or help to propagate the meme. Historical memes reanimate the past with the help of historical artefacts (such as photos and videos), to adapt the memories of the past to the circumstances of the present. In times of war, or in any other conflict context, memoricity plays a significant role in narratives related to collective security and evokes affective responses by re-activating feelings associated with past experiences. Historical memes accentuate the emotional and intertextual load by tying contemporary commentary to emotionally charged historical and cultural motifs such as visual and/or verbal references to historical events, characters, catch phrases, etc. They function as shortcuts to basic categorisations of “us” and “them”, friends and enemies. Our aim is to analyse how historical motives contribute to the meaning-making in memes: which historical memes are commonly used in the context of the Russia–Ukraine conflict from 2014, which recurrent motifs transpire in the data, and what the relationship between the historical references and stance of the memes is. Memes offered a vernacular viewpoint on this conflict already since the illegal annexation of Crimea by Russia in 2014, and have been actively used throughout the years up to the ongoing military invasion. Some of the memes referred to (pre) historical events, but most of the references res ort to the history of 20th century. The motif of WWII was the most prevalent historical reference in memes on the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine that circulated in Ukraine, Russia and Belarus. While the references to ancient and mediaeval times are generally used to create a certain distance to the 2022 war and place its events and participants in a completely different context, references to the Russian Empire and WWII often draw direct parallels between historical and the contemporary events. The instrumentalist approach to history that is consciously employed by the state can also function on a vernacular level by employing and recognising certain historical references in memes. The results show that historical memes can offer a way of legitimising contemporary events through history. The current actions and political decisions acquire firmness and justification if they are linked to historical events and actors that everyone remembers from school. They also contribute to establishing superiority over enemies, as the audiences find proof in their reasoning when they compare the past with the present. Memes ridicule or praise the people involved with the help of intertextuality pointing at well-known historical personae like Hitler, Goebbels or Stalin. In doing that, memes with historical references seem to demand a more nuanced cultural literacy, while other memes simply depend on the more basic shared cultural background of their creators and audiences to be understood and spread. Approaching historical memes from this angle, we can reveal the workings of intertextuality and their role in different kinds of memes, given that previous research has shown that not all the references and allusions need to be understood to find a meme funny.  
"普特勒失败了":关于俄罗斯乌克兰战争的历史备忘录 / "普特勒失败了":关于俄罗斯乌克兰战争的历史备忘录
Teesid:Uurimuses analüsitakse ajaloomeeme Vene sõja kohta Ukrainas.我们的母语是 "母语",我们的母语是 "母语",我们的母语是 "母语",我们的母语是 "母语",我们的母语是 "母语"。因此,我们必须对其进行全面的分析和研究,以确定其对人类的影响。分析结果表明,俄罗斯在 2022 年 2 月 24 日启动了 "俄罗斯 "计划。 2022 年 2 月 24 日,俄罗斯在乌克兰发动了全面战争。这场战争引发了许多与早期冲突相似的白话反应。人们对这场战争发表了大量严肃或幽默的反应和评论,"备忘录 "的创建和传播也急剧上升。其中一些利用历史动机来强调言论的立场和信息。历史记忆是广泛传播的文化单元,明确与特定的历史事件或人物相关。它们与加强或有助于传播记忆的记忆实践相关联。历史记忆体借助历史文物(如照片和视频)重现过去,使过去的记忆适应现在的环境。在战争时期或任何其他冲突背景下,记忆性在与集体安全有关的叙事中发挥着重要作用,并通过重新激活与过去经历相关的情感,唤起人们的情感反应。历史记忆通过将当代评论与带有情感色彩的历史和文化主题(如对历史事件、人物、口头禅等的视觉和/或口头引用)联系起来,加重了情感和互文的负担。它们是 "我们 "和 "他们"、朋友和敌人基本分类的捷径。我们的目的是分析历史动机如何促进了记忆体的意义生成:在 2014 年俄乌冲突的背景下,哪些历史记忆体被普遍使用,哪些重复出现的主题出现在数据中,以及历史参考和记忆体立场之间的关系是什么。自 2014 年俄罗斯非法吞并克里米亚以来,备忘录就已经为这场冲突提供了一种方言观点,并在多年来一直被积极使用,直至目前的军事入侵。有些备忘录提到了(前)历史事件,但大多数提到的是 20 世纪的历史。在乌克兰、俄罗斯和白俄罗斯流传的关于 2022 年俄罗斯入侵乌克兰的备忘录中,二战主题是最普遍的历史参考。对古代和中世纪的引用通常是为了与 2022 年的战争拉开一定距离,并将其事件和参与者置于完全不同的背景下,而对俄罗斯帝国和二战的引用则往往将历史事件与当代事件直接相提并论。国家有意识采用的工具主义历史方法也可以通过在记忆体中使用和识别某些历史参考资料,在方言层面发挥作用。研究结果表明,历史记忆可以提供一种通过历史使当代事件合法化的方法。如果当前的行动和政治决策与每个人都记得的历史事件和历史人物相关联,那么这些行动和政治决策就会变得更加坚定和合理。它们还有助于建立对敌人的优越感,因为受众在将过去与现在进行比较时,会发现自己的推理有理有据。备忘录借助互文性,指向希特勒、戈培尔或斯大林等著名历史人物,对相关人物进行嘲讽或赞美。在这样做的过程中,有历史参照的备忘录似乎需要更细致的文化素养,而其他备忘录则仅仅依赖于其创造者和受众更基本的共同文化背景来理解和传播。从这个角度来研究历史记忆,我们可以揭示互文性的运作及其在不同类型记忆中的作用,因为以往的研究表明,并不是所有的参考文献和典故都需要理解才能发现记忆的有趣之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信