Negotiating Islamic Law: The Practice of Inheritance Distribution in Polygamous Marriages in Indonesian Islamic Courts

Hotnidah Nasution, Ahmad Rifqi Muchtar
{"title":"Negotiating Islamic Law: The Practice of Inheritance Distribution in Polygamous Marriages in Indonesian Islamic Courts","authors":"Hotnidah Nasution, Ahmad Rifqi Muchtar","doi":"10.24090/mnh.v18i1.10921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research attempts to look at the allocation of inheritance in polygamous marriages, as adjudicated by the Indonesian Islamic courts, commonly known as the Religious Courts. In a polygamous marriage, the inheritance distribution often faces more complex challenges. This research is grounded in an analysis of decisions from the Religious Courts, including both first-instance and appellate court rulings. The findings indicate that inheritance distribution in polygamous marriages relies not just on the Islamic Law Compilation, but also on the Indonesian Civil Code. Moreover, the judges employed two approaches to resolve disputes: Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) and the Islamic Law Compilation, which is the codified Islamic law in Indonesia. When the judges referred to the classical texts of Islamic jurisprudence, they allocated the entirety of the inherited properties among the heirs. Negotiation occurred when judges opted for the Islamic Law Compilation instead of classical fiqh, leading them to consider the concept of joint property and distinguish it from the estates. Ultimately, the Appellate Court judges appeared more progressive, taking into account the Indonesian context and ensuring justice for wives in polygamous marriages.","PeriodicalId":215937,"journal":{"name":"Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam","volume":"59 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v18i1.10921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research attempts to look at the allocation of inheritance in polygamous marriages, as adjudicated by the Indonesian Islamic courts, commonly known as the Religious Courts. In a polygamous marriage, the inheritance distribution often faces more complex challenges. This research is grounded in an analysis of decisions from the Religious Courts, including both first-instance and appellate court rulings. The findings indicate that inheritance distribution in polygamous marriages relies not just on the Islamic Law Compilation, but also on the Indonesian Civil Code. Moreover, the judges employed two approaches to resolve disputes: Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) and the Islamic Law Compilation, which is the codified Islamic law in Indonesia. When the judges referred to the classical texts of Islamic jurisprudence, they allocated the entirety of the inherited properties among the heirs. Negotiation occurred when judges opted for the Islamic Law Compilation instead of classical fiqh, leading them to consider the concept of joint property and distinguish it from the estates. Ultimately, the Appellate Court judges appeared more progressive, taking into account the Indonesian context and ensuring justice for wives in polygamous marriages.
协商伊斯兰法:印度尼西亚伊斯兰法院在一夫多妻制婚姻中的遗产分配实践
本研究试图探讨一夫多妻制婚姻中的遗产分配问题,一夫多妻制婚姻由印度尼西亚伊斯兰法院(通常称为宗教法院)裁决。在一夫多妻制婚姻中,遗产分配往往面临更复杂的挑战。本研究基于对宗教法院裁决的分析,包括一审法院和上诉法院的裁决。研究结果表明,一夫多妻制婚姻中的遗产分配不仅依赖于《伊斯兰法律汇编》,还依赖于《印度尼西亚民法典》。此外,法官还采用了两种方法来解决纠纷:伊斯兰法学(fiqh)和《伊斯兰法律汇编》,后者是印度尼西亚的伊斯兰成文法。当法官参考伊斯兰法学经典文本时,他们在继承人之间分配继承的全部财产。当法官们选择《伊斯兰法律汇编》而非经典伊斯兰教法时,出现了协商,这导致他们考虑共同财产的概念,并将其与遗产区分开来。最终,上诉法院的法官考虑到印度尼西亚的国情,确保为一夫多妻制婚姻中的妻子伸张正义,显得更加进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信