“It’s Going to Go Beyond These Walls”: Toward a More Expansive Vision of Civic Learning

Beth C. Rubin
{"title":"“It’s Going to Go Beyond These Walls”: Toward a More Expansive Vision of Civic Learning","authors":"Beth C. Rubin","doi":"10.1177/01614681241261175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past several decades, understandings of civic knowledge and engagement have been enlarged in productive ways; the field has been transformed by contributions rooted in and showcasing critical, cultural, transnational, activist, and participatory approaches to the civic. Civic action research fits neatly amid these new articulations of the civic; multiple studies attest to its potential for creating civic learning experiences that build on young people’s strengths and provide space for critical analysis and informed action. In this social design project, civic action research investigations conducted by youth in communities impacted by structural inequality catalyzed densely interwoven, affectively infused networks of cross-district interaction and action: critical ecologies of civic learning. This article retheorizes civic learning in light of findings from a research initiative rooted in the question: “How might civic inquiry be used to create school district practices that nurture and integrate the civic voice of youth?” In this 18-month-long social design collaboration between a university-based research team and two public school districts in the northeastern United States, youth in five participating schools—two high schools and three middle schools—carried out civic inquiry projects under the guidance of experienced social studies teachers. In these projects, young people examined their communities, selected issues to investigate, designed and carried out research, analyzed data, communicated findings, and took action. Data collected by the adult researchers included observations of club sessions, focus groups with students, interviews with adult stakeholders, and observations of “civic voice events” involving both youth and adults. Interdisciplinary, iterative reading and thematic coding led to the development of the conceptual framework that is the focus of this article. This article illustrates and theorizes critical ecosystems of civic learning. In this project, civic learning was collectively produced rather than vertically transmitted—a joint activity of youth and adults. A historically and structurally situated phenomenon, civic learning was not separable from the resources, assets, and experiences that young people brought with them as civic actors. Civic learning was not bound by the container of the classroom—it moved and flowed across settings, accruing through the interactions of people inhabiting varied perspectives. Finally, civic learning was affective and relational, engaging emotion and fostering connection. Building upon and extending critical and participatory reframings, a critical ecosystems theorization of civic learning can help us to envision deeper, more expansive forms of civic education that support, activate, and empower young people from across a broad spectrum of communities, propelling us toward a more just and inclusive civic future.","PeriodicalId":22248,"journal":{"name":"Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681241261175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past several decades, understandings of civic knowledge and engagement have been enlarged in productive ways; the field has been transformed by contributions rooted in and showcasing critical, cultural, transnational, activist, and participatory approaches to the civic. Civic action research fits neatly amid these new articulations of the civic; multiple studies attest to its potential for creating civic learning experiences that build on young people’s strengths and provide space for critical analysis and informed action. In this social design project, civic action research investigations conducted by youth in communities impacted by structural inequality catalyzed densely interwoven, affectively infused networks of cross-district interaction and action: critical ecologies of civic learning. This article retheorizes civic learning in light of findings from a research initiative rooted in the question: “How might civic inquiry be used to create school district practices that nurture and integrate the civic voice of youth?” In this 18-month-long social design collaboration between a university-based research team and two public school districts in the northeastern United States, youth in five participating schools—two high schools and three middle schools—carried out civic inquiry projects under the guidance of experienced social studies teachers. In these projects, young people examined their communities, selected issues to investigate, designed and carried out research, analyzed data, communicated findings, and took action. Data collected by the adult researchers included observations of club sessions, focus groups with students, interviews with adult stakeholders, and observations of “civic voice events” involving both youth and adults. Interdisciplinary, iterative reading and thematic coding led to the development of the conceptual framework that is the focus of this article. This article illustrates and theorizes critical ecosystems of civic learning. In this project, civic learning was collectively produced rather than vertically transmitted—a joint activity of youth and adults. A historically and structurally situated phenomenon, civic learning was not separable from the resources, assets, and experiences that young people brought with them as civic actors. Civic learning was not bound by the container of the classroom—it moved and flowed across settings, accruing through the interactions of people inhabiting varied perspectives. Finally, civic learning was affective and relational, engaging emotion and fostering connection. Building upon and extending critical and participatory reframings, a critical ecosystems theorization of civic learning can help us to envision deeper, more expansive forms of civic education that support, activate, and empower young people from across a broad spectrum of communities, propelling us toward a more just and inclusive civic future.
"它将超越这些围墙":迈向更广阔的公民学习愿景
在过去的几十年里,对公民知识和参与的理解以富有成效的方式得到了扩展;扎根于并展示批判性、文化、跨国、行动主义和参与性公民方法的研究成果改变了这一领域。公民行动研究与公民的这些新表述不谋而合;多项研究证明,公民行动研究具有创造公民学习体验的潜力,既能发挥年轻人的优势,又能为批判性分析和知情行动提供空间。在这个社会设计项目中,青年在受结构性不平等影响的社区开展的公民行动研究调查催化了密集交织、情感渗透的跨区互动和行动网络:公民学习的关键生态。这篇文章根据一项研究计划的发现,对公民学习进行了重新理论化,该研究计划的根本问题是"如何利用公民探究来创建培养和整合青年公民声音的校区实践?在一个以大学为基础的研究团队与美国东北部两个公立学校学区之间长达 18 个月的社会设计合作中,五所参与学校(两所高中和三所初中)的青少年在经验丰富的社会研究教师的指导下开展了公民探究项目。在这些项目中,青少年考察了他们的社区,选择了要调查的问题,设计并开展了研究,分析了数据,交流了调查结果,并采取了行动。成人研究人员收集的数据包括对俱乐部会议的观察、与学生进行的焦点小组讨论、对成人利益相关者的访谈,以及对青年和成人共同参与的 "公民之声活动 "的观察。通过跨学科、反复阅读和主题编码,形成了本文所关注的概念框架。本文阐述了公民学习的关键生态系统,并将其理论化。在这个项目中,公民学习是集体产生的,而不是垂直传播的--是青少年和成年人的共同活动。公民学习是一种历史性和结构性现象,与青年作为公民行动者所带来的资源、资产和经验不可分割。公民学习不受教室的束缚--它在不同的环境中流动,通过不同视角的人的互动而累积。最后,公民学习是情感性和关系性的,它调动情感,促进联系。在批判性和参与性重构的基础上并加以延伸,公民学习的批判性生态系统理论可以帮助我们设想更深入、更广泛的公民教育形式,支持、激活和增强来自广泛社区的年轻人的能力,推动我们走向更加公正和包容的公民未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信