Low rate of population establishment of a freshwater invertebrate (Gammarus lacustris) in experimental conservation translocations

IF 2.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Megan J. Fitzpatrick, Michael J. Anteau, Carl W. Isaacson, Jake D. Carleen, Breanna R. Keith, Barry Thoele, Michael Bieganek, Alaina A. Taylor, D. Larson
{"title":"Low rate of population establishment of a freshwater invertebrate (Gammarus lacustris) in experimental conservation translocations","authors":"Megan J. Fitzpatrick, Michael J. Anteau, Carl W. Isaacson, Jake D. Carleen, Breanna R. Keith, Barry Thoele, Michael Bieganek, Alaina A. Taylor, D. Larson","doi":"10.1111/rec.14191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conservation translocations may be a useful tool for the restoration of declining freshwater invertebrates, but they are poorly represented in the literature. We conducted a before‐after/control‐impact (BACI) experiment to test the efficacy of conservation translocation for re‐establishing abundant populations of the amphipod Gammarus lacustris, a declining species and wildlife food resource in depressional wetlands in the upper Midwest of the United States of America. Each study site (n = 19) contained at least one treatment wetland receiving translocated G. lacustris from a local donor and one control wetland. We selected study wetlands based on a suite of wetland characteristics and randomly assigned recipient versus control treatment. Gammarus lacustris was detected post‐translocation at only 2 of 22 recipient wetlands (1 of 19 sites). Overall, there was a statistical increase in G. lacustris density in recipient wetlands compared to controls; however, the results were of minimal biological significance due to being driven by a single site with low G. lacustris densities. Accordingly, our results suggest that future conservation translocations of amphipods might be successful if limited to recently restored wetlands or informed by a more complex habitat suitability model to differentiate dispersal limitations from habitat limitations. To develop such a model would involve identifying the fewest, most influential physical and biological factors (e.g. wetland size/structure, fish, aquatic vegetation, and water chemistry) from the numerous inter‐related factors that correlate with the abundance of naturally occurring G. lacustris; candidate wetlands to receive amphipods would be those for which the model predicts abundant G. lacustris but in which they do not presently occur.","PeriodicalId":54487,"journal":{"name":"Restoration Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restoration Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14191","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conservation translocations may be a useful tool for the restoration of declining freshwater invertebrates, but they are poorly represented in the literature. We conducted a before‐after/control‐impact (BACI) experiment to test the efficacy of conservation translocation for re‐establishing abundant populations of the amphipod Gammarus lacustris, a declining species and wildlife food resource in depressional wetlands in the upper Midwest of the United States of America. Each study site (n = 19) contained at least one treatment wetland receiving translocated G. lacustris from a local donor and one control wetland. We selected study wetlands based on a suite of wetland characteristics and randomly assigned recipient versus control treatment. Gammarus lacustris was detected post‐translocation at only 2 of 22 recipient wetlands (1 of 19 sites). Overall, there was a statistical increase in G. lacustris density in recipient wetlands compared to controls; however, the results were of minimal biological significance due to being driven by a single site with low G. lacustris densities. Accordingly, our results suggest that future conservation translocations of amphipods might be successful if limited to recently restored wetlands or informed by a more complex habitat suitability model to differentiate dispersal limitations from habitat limitations. To develop such a model would involve identifying the fewest, most influential physical and biological factors (e.g. wetland size/structure, fish, aquatic vegetation, and water chemistry) from the numerous inter‐related factors that correlate with the abundance of naturally occurring G. lacustris; candidate wetlands to receive amphipods would be those for which the model predicts abundant G. lacustris but in which they do not presently occur.
淡水无脊椎动物(Gammarus lacustris)在实验性保护迁移中的低种群建立率
保护性迁移可能是恢复衰退的淡水无脊椎动物的有用工具,但在文献中却很少见。我们进行了一项前后/控制-影响(BACI)实验,以检验保护性迁移对重建两足类水蚤(Gammarus lacustris)丰富种群的效果,两足类水蚤是美国中西部上部洼地中的一种衰退物种和野生动物食物资源。每个研究地点(n = 19)至少包含一个接受当地捐赠者转移的长尾鳕的处理湿地和一个对照湿地。我们根据湿地的一系列特征选择研究湿地,并随机分配接受者与对照处理。在 22 个受体湿地中,仅有 2 个(19 个地点中的 1 个)在转移后检测到长尾鳕(Gammarus lacustris)。总体而言,与对照组相比,受援湿地中的长尾鳕密度有统计学意义上的增加;但是,由于受单个长尾鳕密度较低的地点的影响,这些结果的生物学意义微乎其微。因此,我们的研究结果表明,如果仅限于最近恢复的湿地,或者采用更复杂的栖息地适宜性模型来区分传播限制和栖息地限制,那么未来对片脚类动物的保护性迁移可能会取得成功。要建立这样一个模型,需要从众多相互关联的因素(如湿地大小/结构、鱼类、水生植被和水化学)中找出最少、最有影响力的物理和生物因素(如湿地大小/结构、鱼类、水生植被和水化学),这些因素与自然出现的片脚类动物的丰度相关;接收片脚类动物的候选湿地将是那些模型预测片脚类动物丰度较高但目前并未出现的湿地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Restoration Ecology
Restoration Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
15.60%
发文量
226
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Restoration Ecology fosters the exchange of ideas among the many disciplines involved with ecological restoration. Addressing global concerns and communicating them to the international research community and restoration practitioners, the journal is at the forefront of a vital new direction in science, ecology, and policy. Original papers describe experimental, observational, and theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine, and freshwater systems, and are considered without taxonomic bias. Contributions span the natural sciences, including ecological and biological aspects, as well as the restoration of soil, air and water when set in an ecological context; and the social sciences, including cultural, philosophical, political, educational, economic and historical aspects. Edited by a distinguished panel, the journal continues to be a major conduit for researchers to publish their findings in the fight to not only halt ecological damage, but also to ultimately reverse it.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信