The European Arrest Warrant and the protection of the best interests of the child: The Court's last word on the limits of mutual recognition and the evolving obligations of national judicial authorities

Q2 Social Sciences
Stefano Montaldo
{"title":"The European Arrest Warrant and the protection of the best interests of the child: The Court's last word on the limits of mutual recognition and the evolving obligations of national judicial authorities","authors":"Stefano Montaldo","doi":"10.1177/1023263x241259311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The annotation analyses the recent CJEU preliminary ruling in the GN case, the latest chapter of the EAW effectiveness vs fundamental rights protection saga. The Court confirms that, in principle, considerations related to the best interests of the child can justify denial of execution of an EAW. However, this limitation can be triggered solely through the demanding Aranyosi and Căldăraru test. By taking this stance, the Court refuses to add a new category of exceptions to mutual recognition. In addition, based on its ever-refined case law, the Court fine-grains the obligations incumbent upon the national judicial authorities with respect to the conduct of direct exchanges of information and seems to advocate for a new obligation for the issuing judicial authority to refrain from using the EAW system when the circumstances of a case make refusal of surrender a highly likely option.","PeriodicalId":39672,"journal":{"name":"Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law","volume":"95 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263x241259311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The annotation analyses the recent CJEU preliminary ruling in the GN case, the latest chapter of the EAW effectiveness vs fundamental rights protection saga. The Court confirms that, in principle, considerations related to the best interests of the child can justify denial of execution of an EAW. However, this limitation can be triggered solely through the demanding Aranyosi and Căldăraru test. By taking this stance, the Court refuses to add a new category of exceptions to mutual recognition. In addition, based on its ever-refined case law, the Court fine-grains the obligations incumbent upon the national judicial authorities with respect to the conduct of direct exchanges of information and seems to advocate for a new obligation for the issuing judicial authority to refrain from using the EAW system when the circumstances of a case make refusal of surrender a highly likely option.
欧洲逮捕令与保护儿童的最大利益:法院关于相互承认的限度和国家司法当局不断演变的义务的最后意见
注释分析了欧盟法院最近在 GN 案中的初步裁决,该案是欧洲逮捕令有效性与基本权利保护传奇的最新一章。法院确认,原则上,与儿童最大利益相关的考虑因素可作为拒绝执行逮捕令的正当理由。然而,这一限制只能通过苛刻的阿兰约西(Aranyosi)和卡尔德拉鲁(Căldăraru)测试来触发。通过采取这一立场,法院拒绝为相互承认增加新的例外类别。此外,根据其不断完善的判例法,法院细化了国家司法当局在进行直接信息交流方面的义务,并似乎主张在案件的具体情况使拒绝移交成为极有可能的选择时,签发引渡令的司法当局有新的义务避免使用引渡令制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信