Distribution-based pooling for combination and multi-model bias correction of climate simulations

Mathieu Vrac, Denis Allard, G. Mariéthoz, S. Thao, Lucas Schmutz
{"title":"Distribution-based pooling for combination and multi-model bias correction of climate simulations","authors":"Mathieu Vrac, Denis Allard, G. Mariéthoz, S. Thao, Lucas Schmutz","doi":"10.5194/esd-15-735-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. For investigating, assessing, and anticipating climate change, tens of global climate models (GCMs) have been designed, each modelling the Earth system slightly differently. To extract a robust signal from the diverse simulations and outputs, models are typically gathered into multi-model ensembles (MMEs). Those are then summarized in various ways, including (possibly weighted) multi-model means, medians, or quantiles. In this work, we introduce a new probability aggregation method termed “alpha pooling” which builds an aggregated cumulative distribution function (CDF) designed to be closer to a reference CDF over the calibration (historical) period. The aggregated CDFs can then be used to perform bias adjustment of the raw climate simulations, hence performing a “multi-model bias correction”. In practice, each CDF is first transformed according to a non-linear transformation that depends on a parameter α. Then, a weight is assigned to each transformed CDF. This weight is an increasing function of the CDF closeness to the reference transformed CDF. Key to the α pooling is a parameter α that describes the type of transformation and hence the type of aggregation, generalizing both linear and log-linear pooling methods. We first establish that α pooling is a proper aggregation method by verifying some optimal properties. Then, focusing on climate model simulations of temperature and precipitation over western Europe, several experiments are run in order to assess the performance of α pooling against methods currently available, including multi-model means and weighted variants. A reanalysis-based evaluation as well as a perfect model experiment and a sensitivity analysis to the set of climate models are run. Our findings demonstrate the superiority of the proposed pooling method, indicating that α pooling presents a potent way to combine GCM CDFs. The results of this study also show that our unique concept of CDF pooling strategy for multi-model bias correction is a credible alternative to usual GCM-by-GCM bias correction methods by allowing handling and considering several climate models at once.\n","PeriodicalId":504863,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Dynamics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-735-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. For investigating, assessing, and anticipating climate change, tens of global climate models (GCMs) have been designed, each modelling the Earth system slightly differently. To extract a robust signal from the diverse simulations and outputs, models are typically gathered into multi-model ensembles (MMEs). Those are then summarized in various ways, including (possibly weighted) multi-model means, medians, or quantiles. In this work, we introduce a new probability aggregation method termed “alpha pooling” which builds an aggregated cumulative distribution function (CDF) designed to be closer to a reference CDF over the calibration (historical) period. The aggregated CDFs can then be used to perform bias adjustment of the raw climate simulations, hence performing a “multi-model bias correction”. In practice, each CDF is first transformed according to a non-linear transformation that depends on a parameter α. Then, a weight is assigned to each transformed CDF. This weight is an increasing function of the CDF closeness to the reference transformed CDF. Key to the α pooling is a parameter α that describes the type of transformation and hence the type of aggregation, generalizing both linear and log-linear pooling methods. We first establish that α pooling is a proper aggregation method by verifying some optimal properties. Then, focusing on climate model simulations of temperature and precipitation over western Europe, several experiments are run in order to assess the performance of α pooling against methods currently available, including multi-model means and weighted variants. A reanalysis-based evaluation as well as a perfect model experiment and a sensitivity analysis to the set of climate models are run. Our findings demonstrate the superiority of the proposed pooling method, indicating that α pooling presents a potent way to combine GCM CDFs. The results of this study also show that our unique concept of CDF pooling strategy for multi-model bias correction is a credible alternative to usual GCM-by-GCM bias correction methods by allowing handling and considering several climate models at once.
基于分布的集合,用于气候模拟的组合和多模型偏差校正
摘要为了调查、评估和预测气候变化,人们设计了数十种全球气候模式(GCM),每种模式对地球系统的模拟略有不同。为了从不同的模拟和输出中提取可靠的信号,通常将模型集合成多模型集合(MMEs)。然后以各种方式对其进行总结,包括(可能加权的)多模型平均值、中位数或量化值。在这项工作中,我们引入了一种新的概率聚合方法,称为 "阿尔法集合",该方法可建立一个聚合累积分布函数(CDF),旨在更接近校准(历史)期间的参考 CDF。然后,汇总的 CDF 可用于对原始气候模拟进行偏差调整,从而进行 "多模型偏差修正"。在实践中,每个 CDF 首先要根据参数 α 进行非线性变换。该权重是 CDF 与参考转换 CDF 的接近程度的递增函数。α 汇集的关键是一个参数 α,它描述了转换的类型,因此也描述了集合的类型,它概括了线性和对数线性集合方法。我们首先通过验证一些最优属性来确定α集合是一种合适的集合方法。然后,以西欧气温和降水的气候模式模拟为重点,进行了几项实验,以评估 α 汇集法与目前可用方法(包括多模式平均值和加权变体)的性能对比。我们进行了基于再分析的评估、完美模式实验以及对气候模式集的敏感性分析。我们的研究结果表明了所提出的集合方法的优越性,表明 α 集合是结合 GCM CDF 的有效方法。这项研究的结果还表明,我们独特的多模式偏差校正 CDF 池策略概念,可以同时处理和考虑多个气候模式,是常用的逐个 GCM 偏差校正方法的可靠替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信