Effect of coping strategies on household food insecurity in Pakistan amid global economic crisis

Q2 Social Sciences
Mumtaz Anwar, Waqas Shair, Saem Hussain
{"title":"Effect of coping strategies on household food insecurity in Pakistan amid global economic crisis","authors":"Mumtaz Anwar, Waqas Shair, Saem Hussain","doi":"10.1111/issj.12520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Food insecurity tends to be more prevalent amid crises. Several households employ various coping strategies to soften the crisis's financial impact and access adequate food for consumption. This study investigates the impact of various coping strategies on household food insecurity in Pakistan. The study endeavours to identify a more effective coping strategy for reducing food insecurity amid an economic crisis. The study uses nationally represented data surveyed to ‘evaluate the socio‐economic impact of a pandemic on the well‐being of people’. We applied the Ordered Logit and Inverse Probability Weighting model to estimate the aftermath of coping strategies on food insecurity levels. The study's findings suggest that a household that used coping strategies amid crisis is a vulnerable household and more likely to have food insecurity status. Moreover, the study suggests that the coping strategies’ extent (quantity) is positively associated with the likelihood of food insecurity. Finally, the study's aftermath suggests that amongst the different coping strategies, the erosive coping strategy has a lower likelihood of incidence of food insecurity than other strategies. However, within the erosive coping strategies, a household sold real estate asset has less likelihood of being food insecure than other erosive coping strategies. Moreover, spending savings or investments and liquidating real estate are crucial in determining the household's food security status amid the crisis. The study's key findings put forth some potential policy implications related to strategies that can hedge against the crisis and promote resilience in the face of food insecurity.","PeriodicalId":35727,"journal":{"name":"International Social Science Journal","volume":"59 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Social Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food insecurity tends to be more prevalent amid crises. Several households employ various coping strategies to soften the crisis's financial impact and access adequate food for consumption. This study investigates the impact of various coping strategies on household food insecurity in Pakistan. The study endeavours to identify a more effective coping strategy for reducing food insecurity amid an economic crisis. The study uses nationally represented data surveyed to ‘evaluate the socio‐economic impact of a pandemic on the well‐being of people’. We applied the Ordered Logit and Inverse Probability Weighting model to estimate the aftermath of coping strategies on food insecurity levels. The study's findings suggest that a household that used coping strategies amid crisis is a vulnerable household and more likely to have food insecurity status. Moreover, the study suggests that the coping strategies’ extent (quantity) is positively associated with the likelihood of food insecurity. Finally, the study's aftermath suggests that amongst the different coping strategies, the erosive coping strategy has a lower likelihood of incidence of food insecurity than other strategies. However, within the erosive coping strategies, a household sold real estate asset has less likelihood of being food insecure than other erosive coping strategies. Moreover, spending savings or investments and liquidating real estate are crucial in determining the household's food security status amid the crisis. The study's key findings put forth some potential policy implications related to strategies that can hedge against the crisis and promote resilience in the face of food insecurity.
应对策略对全球经济危机下巴基斯坦家庭粮食不安全状况的影响
在危机期间,粮食不安全的情况往往更为普遍。一些家庭会采取各种应对策略,以减轻危机带来的经济影响,并获得足够的食物用于消费。本研究调查了各种应对策略对巴基斯坦家庭粮食不安全的影响。研究旨在找出一种更有效的应对策略,以减少经济危机中的粮食不安全状况。本研究使用了全国性的调查数据,以 "评估大流行病对人们福祉的社会经济影响"。我们采用了有序 Logit 和反概率加权模型来估计应对策略对粮食不安全水平的影响。研究结果表明,在危机中使用应对策略的家庭属于弱势家庭,更有可能出现粮食不安全状况。此外,研究还表明,应对策略的程度(数量)与粮食不安全的可能性呈正相关。最后,研究结果表明,在不同的应对策略中,侵蚀性应对策略发生粮食不安全的可能性低于其他策略。然而,在侵蚀性应对策略中,家庭出售不动产资产比其他侵蚀性应对策略更不可能出现粮食不安全。此外,花费储蓄或投资以及变现不动产对于决定危机中家庭的粮食安全状况至关重要。本研究的主要发现提出了一些潜在的政策影响,这些影响涉及可以对冲危机和提高面对粮食不安全的复原力的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Social Science Journal
International Social Science Journal Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The International Social Science Journal bridges social science communities across disciplines and continents with a view to sharing information and debate with the widest possible audience. The ISSJ has a particular focus on interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary work that pushes the boundaries of current approaches, and welcomes both applied and theoretical research. Originally founded by UNESCO in 1949, ISSJ has since grown into a forum for innovative review, reflection and discussion informed by recent and ongoing international, social science research. It provides a home for work that asks questions in new ways and/or employs original methods to classic problems and whose insights have implications across the disciplines and beyond the academy. The journal publishes regular editions featuring rigorous, peer-reviewed research articles that reflect its international and heterodox scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信