The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Respiratory Cytology: To Establish Efficacy and Ease to Use in Routine Cytology Practice

Neha Sharma, Sonam Sharma, Mukul Singh
{"title":"The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Respiratory Cytology: To Establish Efficacy and Ease to Use in Routine Cytology Practice","authors":"Neha Sharma, Sonam Sharma, Mukul Singh","doi":"10.4103/jalh.jalh_17_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n Various pulmonary cytology techniques have been established, representing morphological diversity and ranging from non-invasive to minimally invasive. However, there is currently no widely accepted classification system for respiratory cytology. In 2016, the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) proposed a six-tiered category system for the cytological sample obtained from the respiratory tract. The diagnostic efficacy of such a category system can help in the early diagnosis of lung cancer patients, thereby reducing mortality and morbidity.\n \n \n \n The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy and utility of PSC guidelines for reporting respiratory cytology specimens in comparison to histopathology.\n \n \n \n This study was conducted over 6 months, from September 2023 to February 2024, on a prospective basis. Out of a total of 165 samples analyzed, 147 (89%) were bronchoalveolar lavage samples, 09 (05%) were bronchial brushings, 03 (02%) were bronchial washings, and 06 (04%) were endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine-needle aspiration. These cytological specimens were processed and categorized according to the PSC reporting system for respiratory cytology, as non-diagnostic, benign, atypical, neoplastic (benign/undetermined malignant potential), suspicious of malignancy, and malignant. In all cases, the histopathological correlation with corresponding transbronchial or endobronchial lung biopsy was done.\n \n \n \n Our study found that 4% of the cases were non-diagnostic, 80% were benign, 13% were atypical, 2% were suspicious for malignancy, and 1% were malignant. When compared with the histological diagnosis, the sensitivity was 53.13%, the specificity was 93.23%, and the overall accuracy was 85.45%.\n \n \n \n The PSC reporting system for respiratory cytology can easily standardize reporting patterns to enhance communication between cytopathologists and clinicians, ultimately improving patient care.\n","PeriodicalId":402083,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Lung Health","volume":"1 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Lung Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jalh.jalh_17_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Various pulmonary cytology techniques have been established, representing morphological diversity and ranging from non-invasive to minimally invasive. However, there is currently no widely accepted classification system for respiratory cytology. In 2016, the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) proposed a six-tiered category system for the cytological sample obtained from the respiratory tract. The diagnostic efficacy of such a category system can help in the early diagnosis of lung cancer patients, thereby reducing mortality and morbidity. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy and utility of PSC guidelines for reporting respiratory cytology specimens in comparison to histopathology. This study was conducted over 6 months, from September 2023 to February 2024, on a prospective basis. Out of a total of 165 samples analyzed, 147 (89%) were bronchoalveolar lavage samples, 09 (05%) were bronchial brushings, 03 (02%) were bronchial washings, and 06 (04%) were endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine-needle aspiration. These cytological specimens were processed and categorized according to the PSC reporting system for respiratory cytology, as non-diagnostic, benign, atypical, neoplastic (benign/undetermined malignant potential), suspicious of malignancy, and malignant. In all cases, the histopathological correlation with corresponding transbronchial or endobronchial lung biopsy was done. Our study found that 4% of the cases were non-diagnostic, 80% were benign, 13% were atypical, 2% were suspicious for malignancy, and 1% were malignant. When compared with the histological diagnosis, the sensitivity was 53.13%, the specificity was 93.23%, and the overall accuracy was 85.45%. The PSC reporting system for respiratory cytology can easily standardize reporting patterns to enhance communication between cytopathologists and clinicians, ultimately improving patient care.
巴氏细胞病理学会呼吸道细胞学报告系统:确定在常规细胞学实践中的有效性和易用性
摘要 目前已建立了多种肺细胞学技术,代表了形态学的多样性,从无创到微创不等。然而,目前还没有被广泛接受的呼吸道细胞学分类系统。2016 年,巴氏细胞病理学会(PSC)针对从呼吸道获取的细胞学样本提出了一个六级分类系统。这种分类系统的诊断功效有助于肺癌患者的早期诊断,从而降低死亡率和发病率。 本研究旨在确定 PSC 指南在报告呼吸道细胞学标本时与组织病理学相比的诊断准确性和实用性。 本研究从 2023 年 9 月至 2024 年 2 月,历时 6 个月,采用前瞻性研究方法。在总共 165 份分析样本中,147 份(89%)为支气管肺泡灌洗样本,09 份(05%)为支气管刷洗样本,03 份(02%)为支气管冲洗样本,06 份(04%)为支气管内超声引导下经支气管细针穿刺样本。这些细胞学标本均按照 PSC 呼吸道细胞学报告系统进行处理和分类,包括非诊断性、良性、非典型、肿瘤性(良性/未确定恶性潜能)、可疑恶性和恶性。所有病例均与相应的经支气管或支气管内肺活检进行了组织病理学相关性分析。 我们的研究发现,4%的病例无法确诊,80%为良性,13%为非典型,2%为可疑恶性,1%为恶性。与组织学诊断相比,敏感性为 53.13%,特异性为 93.23%,总体准确率为 85.45%。 呼吸道细胞学 PSC 报告系统可轻松实现报告模式标准化,加强细胞病理学家与临床医生之间的沟通,最终改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信