Exploring Learner Engagement with English Debates: A Case Study of Chinese University Students

Ruiyu Yang
{"title":"Exploring Learner Engagement with English Debates: A Case Study of Chinese University Students","authors":"Ruiyu Yang","doi":"10.62051/bz5mmg03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While many studies have examined students' participation in English debates with a focus on their development of English argumentation skills, second language (L2) learners' engagement with English debates has yet to be explored. Informed by a tripartite model on learner engagement, this study employed a case study involving four Chinese L2 learners to explore how they cognitively, behaviourally, and affectively engaged with English debates. Data was collected from multiple sources, including semi-structured interviews with students, notes taken in the debate classes, and class observations. Iterative analysis of the data revealed different patterns of learner engagement at all three dimensions among the four participants. It was also found that multiple factors, including their understanding of argumentation skills, self-evaluation of their language proficiency, their learning attitudes, and the instructor's teaching methods, played a role in their engagement with English debates. The findings suggest that teachers need to consider individual students' attitudes, beliefs, and L2 proficiency and provide explicit instruction on argumentation skills to enhance their engagement with English debate.","PeriodicalId":512428,"journal":{"name":"Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research","volume":"34 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62051/bz5mmg03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While many studies have examined students' participation in English debates with a focus on their development of English argumentation skills, second language (L2) learners' engagement with English debates has yet to be explored. Informed by a tripartite model on learner engagement, this study employed a case study involving four Chinese L2 learners to explore how they cognitively, behaviourally, and affectively engaged with English debates. Data was collected from multiple sources, including semi-structured interviews with students, notes taken in the debate classes, and class observations. Iterative analysis of the data revealed different patterns of learner engagement at all three dimensions among the four participants. It was also found that multiple factors, including their understanding of argumentation skills, self-evaluation of their language proficiency, their learning attitudes, and the instructor's teaching methods, played a role in their engagement with English debates. The findings suggest that teachers need to consider individual students' attitudes, beliefs, and L2 proficiency and provide explicit instruction on argumentation skills to enhance their engagement with English debate.
探索学习者参与英语辩论的情况:中国大学生案例研究
虽然许多研究已经考察了学生参与英语辩论的情况,重点关注他们英语论证技能的发展,但第二语言(L2)学习者参与英语辩论的情况尚待探讨。本研究以学习者参与的三方模式为基础,采用案例研究的方法,涉及四名中国第二语言学习者,探讨他们如何在认知、行为和情感上参与英语辩论。研究从多个渠道收集数据,包括与学生的半结构式访谈、辩论课笔记和课堂观察。对数据的迭代分析表明,四名参与者在所有三个维度上的学习参与模式各不相同。研究还发现,学生对辩论技巧的理解、对自己语言水平的自我评价、学习态度以及教师的教学方法等多种因素对他们参与英语辩论起到了影响作用。研究结果表明,教师需要考虑每个学生的态度、信念和语言水平,并提供明确的论证技巧指导,以提高他们对英语辩论的参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信