The state as a market maker: The rise (and fall) of Brazilian securitization in the 21st century

Marlon Altavini de Abreu, Jeroen Johannes Klink, M. Aalbers
{"title":"The state as a market maker: The rise (and fall) of Brazilian securitization in the 21st century","authors":"Marlon Altavini de Abreu, Jeroen Johannes Klink, M. Aalbers","doi":"10.1177/0308518x241258038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses housing securitization in Brazil during 2007–2020 and provides three contributions to debates on the relations between the state and financialization in emerging markets. First, we highlight that the Brazilian state has gone far beyond the common role of market enabling, characterized by regulatory rollout and fiscal incentives. Instead, by acting as a market maker on the demand and supply side, it has provided the required liquidity and depth for the emerging segment of residential securitization. Unlike the financial disintermediation through private market makers such as brokerage houses and individual traders that provide risk-reduction, Brazilian securitization has unfolded through the issuance and acquisition of securities by the state’s housing bank and its associated social housing fund. Second, unlike the speculative Minsky type of booms and busts that characterize privately-driven markets, state market making generates a trajectory that is associated with the capacity of governments to roll-out markets for residential securitization. While the social-developmental stance of the Lula and Dilma administrations have boosted securitization, the market-oriented austerity politics of the Temer and Bolsonaro administrations have quickly dried up secondary markets. Finally, while securitization was initially a means to the end of social housing, it seems increasingly the other way around. More specifically, considering that thick and consolidated secondary markets ultimately depend on the quality and stability of the underlying loans and income streams that originate operations, stricter risk reduction and guarantees clauses have gradually penetrated the social housing segment and threaten to undermine the right to secure tenure.","PeriodicalId":507698,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space","volume":"68 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x241258038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyses housing securitization in Brazil during 2007–2020 and provides three contributions to debates on the relations between the state and financialization in emerging markets. First, we highlight that the Brazilian state has gone far beyond the common role of market enabling, characterized by regulatory rollout and fiscal incentives. Instead, by acting as a market maker on the demand and supply side, it has provided the required liquidity and depth for the emerging segment of residential securitization. Unlike the financial disintermediation through private market makers such as brokerage houses and individual traders that provide risk-reduction, Brazilian securitization has unfolded through the issuance and acquisition of securities by the state’s housing bank and its associated social housing fund. Second, unlike the speculative Minsky type of booms and busts that characterize privately-driven markets, state market making generates a trajectory that is associated with the capacity of governments to roll-out markets for residential securitization. While the social-developmental stance of the Lula and Dilma administrations have boosted securitization, the market-oriented austerity politics of the Temer and Bolsonaro administrations have quickly dried up secondary markets. Finally, while securitization was initially a means to the end of social housing, it seems increasingly the other way around. More specifically, considering that thick and consolidated secondary markets ultimately depend on the quality and stability of the underlying loans and income streams that originate operations, stricter risk reduction and guarantees clauses have gradually penetrated the social housing segment and threaten to undermine the right to secure tenure.
作为做市商的国家:21 世纪巴西证券化的兴起(和衰落
本文分析了 2007-2020 年间巴西的住房证券化,并对新兴市场中国家与金融化之间关系的讨论做出了三点贡献。首先,我们强调巴西政府已经远远超越了以监管推广和财政激励为特征的市场扶持这一常见角色。相反,通过充当供需双方的做市商,巴西政府为住宅证券化这一新兴领域提供了所需的流动性和深度。与通过经纪公司和个人交易商等私人做市商进行金融脱媒以降低风险不同,巴西的证券化是通过国家住房银行及其相关的社会住房基金发行和收购证券展开的。其次,与私人驱动市场的投机性明斯基类型的繁荣和萧条不同,国家做市商产生的轨迹与政府推出住宅证券化市场的能力有关。卢拉和迪尔玛政府的社会发展立场推动了证券化,而特梅尔和博尔索纳罗政府以市场为导向的紧缩政治则使二级市场迅速枯竭。最后,尽管证券化最初是实现社会住房目标的一种手段,但现在似乎越来越反其道而行之。更具体地说,考虑到厚实和巩固的二级市场最终取决于基础贷款的质量和稳定性以及发起业务的收入流,更严格的风险降低和担保条款已逐渐渗透到社会住房领域,并有可能损害安居权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信