M. Vicari, J. F. Facco, S. Peixoto, Gabriel S. de Carvalho, Luana Floriano, O. Prestes, M. Adaime, Renato Zanella
{"title":"Simultaneous Determination of Multiresidues of Pesticides and Veterinary Drugs in Agricultural Soil Using QuEChERS and UHPLC–MS/MS","authors":"M. Vicari, J. F. Facco, S. Peixoto, Gabriel S. de Carvalho, Luana Floriano, O. Prestes, M. Adaime, Renato Zanella","doi":"10.3390/separations11060188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil is one of the main destinations for pesticides and veterinary drugs used in agriculture and animal production. The negative consequences of the accumulation of these compounds in the environment make it important to monitor these compounds in the soil. In this study, we compared different extraction procedures using solvent shaking, ultrasound, or QuEChERS, and their combinations, for the simultaneous determination of 75 pesticide and seven veterinary drug residues in agricultural soil by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to serial mass spectrometry (UHPLC–MS/MS). The method using QuEChERS combined with shaking showed the best results for soil using the addition of water, followed by extraction with acetonitrile acidified with acetic acid and shaking in a shaker. For partitioning, anhydrous magnesium sulfate and anhydrous sodium acetate were used. The extract was centrifuged, filtered, and diluted (1:4, v/v) in water for determination by UHPLC–MS/MS. Method validation showed adequate accuracy and precision results, with recoveries between 70 and 120% and RSD ≤ 20% for the vast majority of the compounds evaluated at the spike levels of 10, 25, 50, and 100 μg kg−1. The method limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) ranged from 3.0 to 7.5 μg kg−1 and from 10 to 25 μg kg−1, respectively. The method was applied to different agricultural soil samples and proved to be efficient for routine analysis.","PeriodicalId":21833,"journal":{"name":"Separations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Separations","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/separations11060188","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Soil is one of the main destinations for pesticides and veterinary drugs used in agriculture and animal production. The negative consequences of the accumulation of these compounds in the environment make it important to monitor these compounds in the soil. In this study, we compared different extraction procedures using solvent shaking, ultrasound, or QuEChERS, and their combinations, for the simultaneous determination of 75 pesticide and seven veterinary drug residues in agricultural soil by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to serial mass spectrometry (UHPLC–MS/MS). The method using QuEChERS combined with shaking showed the best results for soil using the addition of water, followed by extraction with acetonitrile acidified with acetic acid and shaking in a shaker. For partitioning, anhydrous magnesium sulfate and anhydrous sodium acetate were used. The extract was centrifuged, filtered, and diluted (1:4, v/v) in water for determination by UHPLC–MS/MS. Method validation showed adequate accuracy and precision results, with recoveries between 70 and 120% and RSD ≤ 20% for the vast majority of the compounds evaluated at the spike levels of 10, 25, 50, and 100 μg kg−1. The method limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) ranged from 3.0 to 7.5 μg kg−1 and from 10 to 25 μg kg−1, respectively. The method was applied to different agricultural soil samples and proved to be efficient for routine analysis.
期刊介绍:
Separations (formerly Chromatography, ISSN 2227-9075, CODEN: CHROBV) provides an advanced forum for separation and purification science and technology in all areas of chemical, biological and physical science. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, unique features of this journal:
Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
Manuscripts concerning summaries and surveys on research cooperation and projects (that are funded by national governments) to give information for a broad field of users.
The scope of the journal includes but is not limited to:
Theory and methodology (theory of separation methods, sample preparation, instrumental and column developments, new separation methodologies, etc.)
Equipment and techniques, novel hyphenated analytical solutions (significantly extended by their combination with spectroscopic methods and in particular, mass spectrometry)
Novel analysis approaches and applications to solve analytical challenges which utilize chromatographic separations as a key step in the overall solution
Computational modelling of separations for the purpose of fundamental understanding and/or chromatographic optimization