Evaluating Facial Trauma in the Amish: A Study of a Unique Patient Population

Bao Y. Sciscent, Hanel W. Eberly, Tonya S King, Richard Bavier, J. Lighthall
{"title":"Evaluating Facial Trauma in the Amish: A Study of a Unique Patient Population","authors":"Bao Y. Sciscent, Hanel W. Eberly, Tonya S King, Richard Bavier, J. Lighthall","doi":"10.1177/19433875241259887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Retrospective Chart Review. The lifestyle of the Amish exposes them to unique mechanisms of injury, making them an important patient population from a facial trauma standpoint. This study analyzes the demographic and clinical risk factors of facial trauma in the Amish. This retrospective chart review identified all Amish patients presenting with facial trauma at a single institution between 2013-2023. There were 87 Amish facial trauma patients. The median age was 9 years old, and 67.8% were male. Most injuries occurred on the road (41.4%), farm (28.7%), or at home (25.3%). The most frequent mechanisms were buggies (27.6%), falls (26.4%), and animals (18.4%). Fifty-eight patients sustained facial fractures, with orbital (n = 40), maxillary (n = 25), and nasal (n = 19) fractures being the most prevalent. The most common cause of facial fractures was buggy injuries (n = 17). Facial reconstruction was performed in 54.2% of buggy injuries, 31.3% of animal injuries, and 8.7% of falls. Patients with buggy injuries presented with the lowest Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores (median 13.5) and had the longest inpatient hospital stay (median 3 days). Increased injury prevention efforts, especially towards buggy injuries, are necessary.","PeriodicalId":505353,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875241259887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Retrospective Chart Review. The lifestyle of the Amish exposes them to unique mechanisms of injury, making them an important patient population from a facial trauma standpoint. This study analyzes the demographic and clinical risk factors of facial trauma in the Amish. This retrospective chart review identified all Amish patients presenting with facial trauma at a single institution between 2013-2023. There were 87 Amish facial trauma patients. The median age was 9 years old, and 67.8% were male. Most injuries occurred on the road (41.4%), farm (28.7%), or at home (25.3%). The most frequent mechanisms were buggies (27.6%), falls (26.4%), and animals (18.4%). Fifty-eight patients sustained facial fractures, with orbital (n = 40), maxillary (n = 25), and nasal (n = 19) fractures being the most prevalent. The most common cause of facial fractures was buggy injuries (n = 17). Facial reconstruction was performed in 54.2% of buggy injuries, 31.3% of animal injuries, and 8.7% of falls. Patients with buggy injuries presented with the lowest Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores (median 13.5) and had the longest inpatient hospital stay (median 3 days). Increased injury prevention efforts, especially towards buggy injuries, are necessary.
评估阿米什人的面部创伤:对一个独特患者群体的研究
回顾病历。阿米什人的生活方式使他们面临独特的受伤机制,因此从面部创伤的角度来看,他们是一个重要的患者群体。本研究分析了阿米什人面部创伤的人口统计学和临床风险因素。这项回顾性病历审查确定了 2013-2023 年间在一家医疗机构就诊的所有面部外伤阿米什病人。共有 87 名阿米什面部外伤患者。中位年龄为 9 岁,67.8% 为男性。大多数伤害发生在路上(41.4%)、农场(28.7%)或家中(25.3%)。最常见的致伤因素是越野车(27.6%)、跌倒(26.4%)和动物(18.4%)。58名患者面部骨折,其中以眼眶骨折(40例)、上颌骨骨折(25例)和鼻骨骨折(19例)最为常见。面部骨折最常见的原因是虫咬伤(17 例)。54.2%的越野车伤、31.3%的动物伤和8.7%的摔伤患者进行了面部重建。马车伤患者的格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分最低(中位数为13.5),住院时间最长(中位数为3天)。有必要加强伤害预防工作,尤其是针对越野车伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信