The prospective multicenter observational study of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMeSI): the results of the Arkhangelsk center

T. N. Semenkova, A. M. Nikonov, A. A. Smetkin, V. Kuzkov, M. Kirov
{"title":"The prospective multicenter observational study of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMeSI): the results of the Arkhangelsk center","authors":"T. N. Semenkova, A. M. Nikonov, A. A. Smetkin, V. Kuzkov, M. Kirov","doi":"10.24884/2078-5658-2024-21-3-34-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective was to assess the disease rate, prevalence of risk factors, diagnostic and management methods as well as outcomes in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI).Materials and methods. During 10 months in 2022-2023, the study included all patients with probable or confirmed diagnosis of AMI, in whom we recorded the presence of known risk factors, clinical and laboratory manifestations of AMI, methods of its diagnosis, management and outcomes within one year.Results. Totally, 705 patients from 32 centers were included in the work, among whom 418 patients were diagnosed with AMI. In Arkhangelsk, 39 patients (mean age – 73 years) were included into the study. According to results of the center in Arkhangelsk, the diagnosis of AMI was confirmed in 69% of patients, while the incidence among all hospitalized was 0.13%. None of the known risk factors (smoking, atrial fibrillation, atherosclerosis, arterial hypertension, previous myocardial infarction and thromboembolic complications) demonstrated a significant statistical association with the development of AMI. Among clinical manifestations, patients with confirmed AMI more likely developed signs of shock compared to patients with unconfirmed AMI (p = 0.028). Laboratory parameters did not differ significantly in both groups; however, in AMI non-survivors, we observed higher blood lactate concentrations. In most cases with confirmed AMI, the diagnosis was established during surgery. In 72% of cases, the situation was assessed as incurable; in 24% of patients, intestinal resection was performed. Mortality in patients with confirmed AMI was 78%.Conclusion. The lack of clear predictors of the disease, specific clinical signs of AMI and available laboratory tests often leads to delay in diagnosis and appropriate management, which causes significant mortality. Further analysis of the data is necessary to improve diagnosis and the results of treatment of the patients with AMI.","PeriodicalId":506088,"journal":{"name":"Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION","volume":"40 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24884/2078-5658-2024-21-3-34-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective was to assess the disease rate, prevalence of risk factors, diagnostic and management methods as well as outcomes in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI).Materials and methods. During 10 months in 2022-2023, the study included all patients with probable or confirmed diagnosis of AMI, in whom we recorded the presence of known risk factors, clinical and laboratory manifestations of AMI, methods of its diagnosis, management and outcomes within one year.Results. Totally, 705 patients from 32 centers were included in the work, among whom 418 patients were diagnosed with AMI. In Arkhangelsk, 39 patients (mean age – 73 years) were included into the study. According to results of the center in Arkhangelsk, the diagnosis of AMI was confirmed in 69% of patients, while the incidence among all hospitalized was 0.13%. None of the known risk factors (smoking, atrial fibrillation, atherosclerosis, arterial hypertension, previous myocardial infarction and thromboembolic complications) demonstrated a significant statistical association with the development of AMI. Among clinical manifestations, patients with confirmed AMI more likely developed signs of shock compared to patients with unconfirmed AMI (p = 0.028). Laboratory parameters did not differ significantly in both groups; however, in AMI non-survivors, we observed higher blood lactate concentrations. In most cases with confirmed AMI, the diagnosis was established during surgery. In 72% of cases, the situation was assessed as incurable; in 24% of patients, intestinal resection was performed. Mortality in patients with confirmed AMI was 78%.Conclusion. The lack of clear predictors of the disease, specific clinical signs of AMI and available laboratory tests often leads to delay in diagnosis and appropriate management, which causes significant mortality. Further analysis of the data is necessary to improve diagnosis and the results of treatment of the patients with AMI.
急性肠系膜缺血前瞻性多中心观察研究(AMeSI):阿尔汉格尔斯克中心的研究结果
目的是评估急性肠系膜缺血(AMI)患者的发病率、危险因素的发生率、诊断和管理方法以及结果。在 2022-2023 年的 10 个月中,研究纳入了所有可能或确诊为急性肠系膜缺血的患者,我们记录了他们是否存在已知的危险因素、急性肠系膜缺血的临床和实验室表现、诊断方法、治疗方法以及一年内的治疗效果。共有来自 32 个中心的 705 名患者参与了这项工作,其中 418 名患者被确诊为急性心肌梗死。阿尔汉格尔斯克有 39 名患者(平均年龄 73 岁)参与研究。根据阿尔汉格尔斯克中心的结果,69%的患者确诊为急性心肌梗死,而所有住院患者的发病率为0.13%。已知的危险因素(吸烟、心房颤动、动脉粥样硬化、动脉高血压、既往心肌梗死和血栓栓塞并发症)均与急性心肌梗死的发生无明显统计学关联。在临床表现中,确诊为急性心肌梗死的患者比未确诊为急性心肌梗死的患者更容易出现休克症状(p = 0.028)。两组患者的实验室指标无明显差异;但在非存活的急性心肌梗死患者中,我们观察到较高的血乳酸浓度。在大多数确诊为急性心肌梗死的病例中,诊断是在手术中确定的。72%的病例被评估为无法治愈;24%的患者进行了肠道切除术。确诊急性肠梗阻患者的死亡率为78%。缺乏明确的疾病预测指标、急性肠梗阻的特异性临床表现和可用的实验室检查,往往会导致诊断和适当治疗的延误,从而造成严重的死亡率。有必要对数据进行进一步分析,以改善急性心肌梗死患者的诊断和治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信