The Efficacy of General Anesthesia with Sevoflurane for Pain Management in Neonates and Infants with Idiopathic Clubfoot Treated with Ponseti Technique and Percutaneous Achilles Tenotomy

Javad Talebnejhad, Maryam Mirzaei Moghaddam, Fateme Morsali, Mojdeh Sarzaeim, Behnam Panjavi, Taghi Baghdadi, Mehrdad Goudarzi, Amir Hossain Khairollahi, Zahra Vahdati, Hossein Nematian, Asghar Hajipoor
{"title":"The Efficacy of General Anesthesia with Sevoflurane for Pain Management in Neonates and Infants with Idiopathic Clubfoot Treated with Ponseti Technique and Percutaneous Achilles Tenotomy","authors":"Javad Talebnejhad, Maryam Mirzaei Moghaddam, Fateme Morsali, Mojdeh Sarzaeim, Behnam Panjavi, Taghi Baghdadi, Mehrdad Goudarzi, Amir Hossain Khairollahi, Zahra Vahdati, Hossein Nematian, Asghar Hajipoor","doi":"10.18502/aacc.v10i3.15686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Idiopathic clubfoot deformity is a relatively common congenital pediatric foot deformity. A percutaneous Achilles tenotomy (PAT) is required to correct the equinus deformity as it is the most resistant component of clubfoot deformity. Although this procedure is mainly performed with local anesthesia, performing this procedure with general anesthesia has significant advantages. Aims: The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of post-procedural pain management of PAT in the treatment of clubfoot with the Ponseti method when performed in a clinic setting with local anesthetic or under general anesthesia \nMethods: This is a multicentric prospective observational evaluation on children less than one year of age with idiopathic clubfoot whom referred for Ponseti casting and PAT. This procedure was done in the control group with local anesthesia and in the intervention group with Sevoflurane mask 8% (MAC 2) and maintenance of anesthesia with Sevoflurane mask 4% (N2O/O2, 50%). The neonatal infant pain scale (NIPS), the amount of milk, and mood changes were evaluated as a criterion to measure the pain level. \nResults: NIPS score in the intervention group was significantly lower than the control group. Children in the intervention group consume significantly more milk than the control group. Furthermore, 76% of children in the intervention group were classified as \"calm,\" 24% as \"relatively restless,\" and no child was classified as \"severely restless.\" While in the control group, 54% of children were classified as \"severely restless,\" and the remaining 46% as \"relatively restless.\" \nConclusion: Our result showed that using general anesthesia to perform achillotomy in the treatment of clubfoot in children could be associated with less pain in these patients and without significant complications.","PeriodicalId":502847,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Anesthesia and Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Anesthesia and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/aacc.v10i3.15686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Idiopathic clubfoot deformity is a relatively common congenital pediatric foot deformity. A percutaneous Achilles tenotomy (PAT) is required to correct the equinus deformity as it is the most resistant component of clubfoot deformity. Although this procedure is mainly performed with local anesthesia, performing this procedure with general anesthesia has significant advantages. Aims: The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of post-procedural pain management of PAT in the treatment of clubfoot with the Ponseti method when performed in a clinic setting with local anesthetic or under general anesthesia Methods: This is a multicentric prospective observational evaluation on children less than one year of age with idiopathic clubfoot whom referred for Ponseti casting and PAT. This procedure was done in the control group with local anesthesia and in the intervention group with Sevoflurane mask 8% (MAC 2) and maintenance of anesthesia with Sevoflurane mask 4% (N2O/O2, 50%). The neonatal infant pain scale (NIPS), the amount of milk, and mood changes were evaluated as a criterion to measure the pain level. Results: NIPS score in the intervention group was significantly lower than the control group. Children in the intervention group consume significantly more milk than the control group. Furthermore, 76% of children in the intervention group were classified as "calm," 24% as "relatively restless," and no child was classified as "severely restless." While in the control group, 54% of children were classified as "severely restless," and the remaining 46% as "relatively restless." Conclusion: Our result showed that using general anesthesia to perform achillotomy in the treatment of clubfoot in children could be associated with less pain in these patients and without significant complications.
七氟醚全身麻醉对采用庞塞蒂技术和经皮跟腱切开术治疗特发性马蹄内翻足的新生儿和婴儿的镇痛效果
背景:特发性马蹄内翻足畸形是一种较为常见的先天性小儿足部畸形。由于马蹄内翻足畸形是足部畸形中最难矫正的部分,因此需要进行经皮跟腱切开术(PAT)来矫正马蹄内翻足畸形。虽然该手术主要是在局部麻醉下进行,但在全身麻醉下进行该手术具有显著优势。目的:本研究旨在比较 PAT 术治疗马蹄内翻足与 Ponseti 法治疗马蹄内翻足的术后疼痛管理的安全性和有效性,前者是在诊所环境下使用局部麻醉,后者是在全身麻醉下进行的 方法:本研究是一项多中心前瞻性研究,旨在比较 PAT 术治疗马蹄内翻足与 Ponseti 法治疗马蹄内翻足的术后疼痛管理的安全性和有效性:这是一项多中心前瞻性观察评估,评估对象为一岁以内的特发性马蹄内翻足患儿,这些患儿被转诊接受 Ponseti 脚型固定和 PAT 治疗。对照组采用局部麻醉,干预组采用 8%(MAC 2)七氟烷面罩,并用 4%(N2O/O2,50%)七氟烷面罩维持麻醉。新生儿疼痛量表(NIPS)、奶量和情绪变化作为衡量疼痛程度的标准。结果干预组的 NIPS 评分明显低于对照组。干预组儿童的牛奶摄入量明显高于对照组。此外,干预组中 76% 的儿童被归类为 "平静",24% 的儿童被归类为 "相对烦躁不安",没有儿童被归类为 "严重烦躁不安"。而在对照组中,54% 的儿童被归类为 "严重躁动不安",其余 46%的儿童被归类为 "相对躁动不安"。结论我们的研究结果表明,在治疗儿童马蹄内翻足的过程中,使用全身麻醉进行腱鞘切开术可以减轻患者的痛苦,而且不会出现明显的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信