Investigating the Role of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol on Fertility Rate in IVF Candidate Patients

F. Behnaz, Atiyeh Tizghadam, Gholamreza Mohseni, Leila Nazari
{"title":"Investigating the Role of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol on Fertility Rate in IVF Candidate Patients","authors":"F. Behnaz, Atiyeh Tizghadam, Gholamreza Mohseni, Leila Nazari","doi":"10.18502/aacc.v10i3.15690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: One of the most important treatments used in women with infertility is IVF, and improving its results can affect the success of assisted reproductive techniques. It was previously shown that anesthetics can enter the follicular fluid (FF), so there is concern about the accumulation of anesthetics in the FF and their negative effects on fertilization and fetal growth under general anesthesia. The use of drugs that have both analgesic and sedative effects but do not have hemodynamic side effects is of particular importance and dexmedetomidine is one of the drugs introduced in this field. On the other hand, the use of sedatives such as midazolam and propofol may cause hemodynamic disturbances and severe hypotension in these patients, which limits the use of such drugs. Accordingly, and considering the importance of the issue, in this study, we decided to evaluate and compare the effect of propofol and dexmedetomidine on fertility in IVF candidates. \nMethods: In this clinical trial study, 78 infertile patients who underwent IVF were randomly examined. After dividing the patients into two groups receiving dexmedetomidine and propofol or standard recording doses, the fertility rate of the patients in the two groups was evaluated using chi-square and Fisher tests at a significance level of 0.05. \nResults: The use of dexmedetomidine for (P = 0.0348) Pressure_After_Dia, HR_Before (P = 0.0204), Injection_Time (P =0.000) and Recovery Time (P =0.000) indices caused a significant increase compared to the propofol group. \nConclusion: The results of the present study did not show a significant difference in the use of these two drugs on fertility.","PeriodicalId":502847,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Anesthesia and Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Anesthesia and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/aacc.v10i3.15690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One of the most important treatments used in women with infertility is IVF, and improving its results can affect the success of assisted reproductive techniques. It was previously shown that anesthetics can enter the follicular fluid (FF), so there is concern about the accumulation of anesthetics in the FF and their negative effects on fertilization and fetal growth under general anesthesia. The use of drugs that have both analgesic and sedative effects but do not have hemodynamic side effects is of particular importance and dexmedetomidine is one of the drugs introduced in this field. On the other hand, the use of sedatives such as midazolam and propofol may cause hemodynamic disturbances and severe hypotension in these patients, which limits the use of such drugs. Accordingly, and considering the importance of the issue, in this study, we decided to evaluate and compare the effect of propofol and dexmedetomidine on fertility in IVF candidates. Methods: In this clinical trial study, 78 infertile patients who underwent IVF were randomly examined. After dividing the patients into two groups receiving dexmedetomidine and propofol or standard recording doses, the fertility rate of the patients in the two groups was evaluated using chi-square and Fisher tests at a significance level of 0.05. Results: The use of dexmedetomidine for (P = 0.0348) Pressure_After_Dia, HR_Before (P = 0.0204), Injection_Time (P =0.000) and Recovery Time (P =0.000) indices caused a significant increase compared to the propofol group. Conclusion: The results of the present study did not show a significant difference in the use of these two drugs on fertility.
研究右美托咪定和丙泊酚对试管婴儿候选患者生育率的影响
背景:试管婴儿是女性不孕症患者最重要的治疗方法之一,改善试管婴儿的效果会影响辅助生殖技术的成功率。以前的研究表明,麻醉剂可进入卵泡液(FF),因此人们担心麻醉剂在卵泡液中的蓄积及其对全身麻醉下的受精和胎儿生长的负面影响。使用既有镇痛和镇静作用又不会对血液动力学产生副作用的药物尤为重要,右美托咪定就是在这一领域引入的药物之一。另一方面,使用咪达唑仑和丙泊酚等镇静剂可能会导致这些患者出现血流动力学紊乱和严重低血压,从而限制了此类药物的使用。因此,考虑到这一问题的重要性,在本研究中,我们决定评估并比较丙泊酚和右美托咪定对试管婴儿候选人生育能力的影响。研究方法在这项临床试验研究中,我们随机抽取了 78 名接受体外受精的不孕患者。将患者分为接受右美托咪定和丙泊酚或标准记录剂量的两组后,在显著性水平为 0.05 的条件下,使用卡方检验和费雪检验对两组患者的受孕率进行评估。结果显示与异丙酚组相比,使用右美托咪定可显著增加压力(P = 0.0348)、心率(P = 0.0204)、注射时间(P = 0.000)和恢复时间(P = 0.000)指数。结论本研究结果显示,使用这两种药物对生育力的影响没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信