M. Safavi, A. Honarmand, Behzad Nazemroaya, Negar Maleky
{"title":"Comparative Study of the Preemptive Dexmedetomidine Versus Ondansetron Effect in Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting after Middle Ear Surgery","authors":"M. Safavi, A. Honarmand, Behzad Nazemroaya, Negar Maleky","doi":"10.18502/aacc.v10i3.15689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Nausea and vomiting after operation has high prevalence and cause adverse effect. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine with ondansetron in prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after middle ear surgery under general anesthesia.and saliva gas in traumatic patients under mechanical ventilation. \nMethods: This in this double-blinded clinical trial study, one hundred and sixty-two patients undergoing middle ear surgery under general anesthesia were randomly divided into three groups of 55 each: ondansetron (O), dexmedetomidine (D) and control (C). Group O received 0.1 mg/kg of ondansetron, Group D received 1 μg/kg/min of dexmedetomidine and Group C received 10 cc of normal saline 15 to 20 minutes before surgical incision. After that, the patients were examined in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and up to 24 hours after the operation in terms of PONV and other study variables. \nResults: The severity of nausea after operation based on VAS (visual analog scale) was significantly different between Group O (2.2±0.7) and Group D (3.9± 0.7) and Group C (5.15±1.3) (P= 0.04). The incidence of vomiting in the first 24h postoperatively was 14.8% in Group O, 46.3% in Group D and 88.8% in Group C (P= 0.003). \nConclusion: Our study showed that ondansetron was better than dexmedetomidine for prevention of PONV after middle ear surgery.","PeriodicalId":502847,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Anesthesia and Critical Care","volume":"3 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Anesthesia and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/aacc.v10i3.15689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Nausea and vomiting after operation has high prevalence and cause adverse effect. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine with ondansetron in prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after middle ear surgery under general anesthesia.and saliva gas in traumatic patients under mechanical ventilation.
Methods: This in this double-blinded clinical trial study, one hundred and sixty-two patients undergoing middle ear surgery under general anesthesia were randomly divided into three groups of 55 each: ondansetron (O), dexmedetomidine (D) and control (C). Group O received 0.1 mg/kg of ondansetron, Group D received 1 μg/kg/min of dexmedetomidine and Group C received 10 cc of normal saline 15 to 20 minutes before surgical incision. After that, the patients were examined in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and up to 24 hours after the operation in terms of PONV and other study variables.
Results: The severity of nausea after operation based on VAS (visual analog scale) was significantly different between Group O (2.2±0.7) and Group D (3.9± 0.7) and Group C (5.15±1.3) (P= 0.04). The incidence of vomiting in the first 24h postoperatively was 14.8% in Group O, 46.3% in Group D and 88.8% in Group C (P= 0.003).
Conclusion: Our study showed that ondansetron was better than dexmedetomidine for prevention of PONV after middle ear surgery.