Comparative Study of the Preemptive Dexmedetomidine Versus Ondansetron Effect in Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting after Middle Ear Surgery

M. Safavi, A. Honarmand, Behzad Nazemroaya, Negar Maleky
{"title":"Comparative Study of the Preemptive Dexmedetomidine Versus Ondansetron Effect in Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting after Middle Ear Surgery","authors":"M. Safavi, A. Honarmand, Behzad Nazemroaya, Negar Maleky","doi":"10.18502/aacc.v10i3.15689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Nausea and vomiting after operation has high prevalence and cause adverse effect. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine with ondansetron in prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after middle ear surgery under general anesthesia.and saliva gas in traumatic patients under mechanical ventilation. \nMethods: This in this double-blinded clinical trial study, one hundred and sixty-two patients undergoing middle ear surgery under general anesthesia were randomly divided into three groups of 55 each: ondansetron (O), dexmedetomidine (D) and control (C). Group O received 0.1 mg/kg of ondansetron, Group D received 1 μg/kg/min of dexmedetomidine and Group C received 10 cc of normal saline 15 to 20 minutes before surgical incision. After that, the patients were examined in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and up to 24 hours after the operation in terms of PONV and other study variables. \nResults: The severity of nausea after operation based on VAS (visual analog scale) was significantly different between Group O (2.2±0.7) and Group D (3.9± 0.7) and Group C (5.15±1.3) (P= 0.04). The incidence of vomiting in the first 24h postoperatively was 14.8% in Group O, 46.3% in Group D and 88.8% in Group C (P= 0.003). \nConclusion: Our study showed that ondansetron was better than dexmedetomidine for prevention of PONV after middle ear surgery.","PeriodicalId":502847,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Anesthesia and Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Anesthesia and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/aacc.v10i3.15689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nausea and vomiting after operation has high prevalence and cause adverse effect. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine with ondansetron in prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after middle ear surgery under general anesthesia.and saliva gas in traumatic patients under mechanical ventilation. Methods: This in this double-blinded clinical trial study, one hundred and sixty-two patients undergoing middle ear surgery under general anesthesia were randomly divided into three groups of 55 each: ondansetron (O), dexmedetomidine (D) and control (C). Group O received 0.1 mg/kg of ondansetron, Group D received 1 μg/kg/min of dexmedetomidine and Group C received 10 cc of normal saline 15 to 20 minutes before surgical incision. After that, the patients were examined in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and up to 24 hours after the operation in terms of PONV and other study variables. Results: The severity of nausea after operation based on VAS (visual analog scale) was significantly different between Group O (2.2±0.7) and Group D (3.9± 0.7) and Group C (5.15±1.3) (P= 0.04). The incidence of vomiting in the first 24h postoperatively was 14.8% in Group O, 46.3% in Group D and 88.8% in Group C (P= 0.003). Conclusion: Our study showed that ondansetron was better than dexmedetomidine for prevention of PONV after middle ear surgery.
右美托咪定与昂丹司琼对中耳手术后恶心呕吐的先期疗效比较研究
背景:手术后恶心和呕吐的发生率很高,并会造成不良影响。本研究旨在比较右美托咪定与昂丹司琼对全身麻醉下中耳手术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的预防效果。方法:在这项双盲临床试验研究中,162 名在全身麻醉下接受中耳手术的患者被随机分为三组,每组 55 人:昂丹司琼组(O)、右美托咪定组(D)和对照组(C)。O 组接受 0.1 mg/kg 的昂丹司琼,D 组接受 1 μg/kg/min 的右美托咪定,C 组在手术切口前 15 至 20 分钟接受 10 cc 的生理盐水。之后,在麻醉后监护室(PACU)和手术后 24 小时内对患者的 PONV 和其他研究变量进行检查。结果根据视觉模拟量表(VAS),O 组(2.2±0.7)、D 组(3.9±0.7)和 C 组(5.15±1.3)的术后恶心严重程度有显著差异(P= 0.04)。术后 24 小时内的呕吐发生率,O 组为 14.8%,D 组为 46.3%,C 组为 88.8%(P= 0.003)。结论我们的研究表明,在预防中耳手术后 PONV 方面,昂丹司琼的效果优于右美托咪定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信