Evaluation of Teaching Practice: Assessment of the Dimensionality of the Intern Teaching Evaluation Form (ITEF)

George Oduro-Okyireh
{"title":"Evaluation of Teaching Practice: Assessment of the Dimensionality of the Intern Teaching Evaluation Form (ITEF)","authors":"George Oduro-Okyireh","doi":"10.37745/bje.2013/vol12n7115135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed at investigating the dimensionality of the Intern Teaching Evaluation Form (ITEF), which is an observation instrument used in the evaluation of teaching practice at a public university in Ghana. The instrument was used to assess the teaching skills of a group of interns across three lessons. Data were obtained over a three-year period from 2016/2017 to 2018/2019 academic years during the Students Internship Programme (SIP) of the university. Part of the overall aim was to find the score stability (reliability) of the ITEF when it is used to evaluate teaching skill. A random effect two facets fully crossed design where intern (t) was crossed with item (i) and lesson (l), given by (t×i×l) was adopted for the dimensionality investigation. Further, a random effect one-facet fully crossed design, where inter (t) was crossed with lesson (l), given by (t×l) was adopted for the reliability investigation. The sample sizes for the study were 9132 undergraduate bachelor’s degree ITEF triplicate scores for the reliability investigation and 50 ITEF triplicate scores for the dimensionality investigation, selected by purposive and simple random sampling methods respectively. Univariate generalisability analysis using EduG was performed to analyse data. Findings were that, the ITEF is not unidimensional, but highly reliable (strongly stable) across the delivery of three lessons. Caution should be exercised in taking the ITEF scores as unidimensional in running correlational analyses with other criteria, unless this is done only from the perspective of ‘use,’ which should be one of the important considerations in instrument design.","PeriodicalId":513982,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Education","volume":"5 47","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37745/bje.2013/vol12n7115135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed at investigating the dimensionality of the Intern Teaching Evaluation Form (ITEF), which is an observation instrument used in the evaluation of teaching practice at a public university in Ghana. The instrument was used to assess the teaching skills of a group of interns across three lessons. Data were obtained over a three-year period from 2016/2017 to 2018/2019 academic years during the Students Internship Programme (SIP) of the university. Part of the overall aim was to find the score stability (reliability) of the ITEF when it is used to evaluate teaching skill. A random effect two facets fully crossed design where intern (t) was crossed with item (i) and lesson (l), given by (t×i×l) was adopted for the dimensionality investigation. Further, a random effect one-facet fully crossed design, where inter (t) was crossed with lesson (l), given by (t×l) was adopted for the reliability investigation. The sample sizes for the study were 9132 undergraduate bachelor’s degree ITEF triplicate scores for the reliability investigation and 50 ITEF triplicate scores for the dimensionality investigation, selected by purposive and simple random sampling methods respectively. Univariate generalisability analysis using EduG was performed to analyse data. Findings were that, the ITEF is not unidimensional, but highly reliable (strongly stable) across the delivery of three lessons. Caution should be exercised in taking the ITEF scores as unidimensional in running correlational analyses with other criteria, unless this is done only from the perspective of ‘use,’ which should be one of the important considerations in instrument design.
教学实践评估:实习生教学评价表(ITEF)的维度评估
实习生教学评价表(ITEF)是加纳一所公立大学用于评价教学实践的观察工具,本研究旨在调查实习生教学评价表的维度。该工具用于评估一组实习生三节课的教学技能。数据是在 2016/2017 学年至 2018/2019 学年的三年期间,在该大学的学生实习计划(SIP)中获得的。总体目标之一是找到 ITEF 用于评估教学技能时的得分稳定性(可靠性)。在维度调查中,采用了随机效应两面完全交叉设计,即实习生(t)与项目(i)和课程(l)交叉,由(t×i×l)给出。此外,信度调查采用了随机效应单面完全交叉设计,即实习生(t)与课程(l)交叉,由(t×l)给出。研究的样本量为:信度调查采用 9132 份本科学士学位 ITEF 一式三份成绩单,维度调查采用 50 份 ITEF 一式三份成绩单,分别采用目的性抽样和简单随机抽样方法选取。数据分析采用 EduG 进行了单变量概括性分析。研究结果表明,ITEF 并非单维度,但在三节课的教学过程中具有高度可靠性(稳定性强)。在进行与其他标准的相关分析时,如果将 ITEF 分数视为单维度,则应谨慎从事,除非仅从 "使用 "的角度进行分析,而 "使用 "应是工具设计的重要考虑因素之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书