Effect of early pulmonary rehabilitation therapy on the pulmonary function of patients with stroke-associated pneumonia and analysis of its effectiveness

Zhanjun Liao, Feiwei Liao
{"title":"Effect of early pulmonary rehabilitation therapy on the pulmonary function of patients with stroke-associated pneumonia and analysis of its effectiveness","authors":"Zhanjun Liao, Feiwei Liao","doi":"10.12669/pjms.40.7.8113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of early pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) treatment methods for stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP). \nMethods: This is a prospective, randomized controlled intervention study. Eighty SAP patients admitted to the rehabilitation department of Liuzhou People’s Hospital from June 2020 to December 2021 were selected and divided into an intervention group (40 cases) and a control group (40 cases) using the random number table approach. Patients in both groups received conventional treatments. Patients in the intervention group received early PR interventions, while patients in the control group received conventional rehabilitation treatment. The clinical effectiveness and pulmonary function indexes were compared. \nResults: The intervention group showed shorter durations of stay in the intensive care unit, relief from symptoms, and mechanical ventilation compared to the control group following treatment (P < 0.05). The total clinical efficacy after intervention in the treatment group was 82.50%, significantly higher than the control group's rate of 47.50% (P < 0.05). After 21 days of treatment, the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)/predicted value in the intervention group was 64.92 ± 8.53, while it was 52.69 ± 7.08 in the other group. The FEV1/forced vital capacity in the intervention group was 59.73 ± 7.18, compared to 50.36 ± 6.54 in the control group. The intervention group had a clinical pulmonary infection score of 2.62 ± 1.13, while the control group had a score of 4.17 ± 2.08. The intervention group showed a significant improvement in lung function, with statistically significant differences compared to the other group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the intervention group had significantly lower levels of interleukin-4 and interleukin-10 compared to the control group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). The average National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score of the intervention group was significantly lower than that of the control group in the second and third weeks after treatment (P < 0.05). \nConclusion: Early comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation can significantly enhance the pulmonary function and respiratory status of SAP patients and facilitate the early recovery of brain function. This approach archives significantly better outcomes compared to conventional PR; therefore, it is worth clinical implementation. \ndoi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.7.8113 \nHow to cite this: Liao Z, Liao F. Effect of early pulmonary rehabilitation therapy on the pulmonary function of patients with stroke-associated pneumonia and analysis of its effectiveness. Pak J Med Sci. 2024;40(7):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.7.8113 \nThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.","PeriodicalId":510423,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.7.8113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of early pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) treatment methods for stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP). Methods: This is a prospective, randomized controlled intervention study. Eighty SAP patients admitted to the rehabilitation department of Liuzhou People’s Hospital from June 2020 to December 2021 were selected and divided into an intervention group (40 cases) and a control group (40 cases) using the random number table approach. Patients in both groups received conventional treatments. Patients in the intervention group received early PR interventions, while patients in the control group received conventional rehabilitation treatment. The clinical effectiveness and pulmonary function indexes were compared. Results: The intervention group showed shorter durations of stay in the intensive care unit, relief from symptoms, and mechanical ventilation compared to the control group following treatment (P < 0.05). The total clinical efficacy after intervention in the treatment group was 82.50%, significantly higher than the control group's rate of 47.50% (P < 0.05). After 21 days of treatment, the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)/predicted value in the intervention group was 64.92 ± 8.53, while it was 52.69 ± 7.08 in the other group. The FEV1/forced vital capacity in the intervention group was 59.73 ± 7.18, compared to 50.36 ± 6.54 in the control group. The intervention group had a clinical pulmonary infection score of 2.62 ± 1.13, while the control group had a score of 4.17 ± 2.08. The intervention group showed a significant improvement in lung function, with statistically significant differences compared to the other group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the intervention group had significantly lower levels of interleukin-4 and interleukin-10 compared to the control group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). The average National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score of the intervention group was significantly lower than that of the control group in the second and third weeks after treatment (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Early comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation can significantly enhance the pulmonary function and respiratory status of SAP patients and facilitate the early recovery of brain function. This approach archives significantly better outcomes compared to conventional PR; therefore, it is worth clinical implementation. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.7.8113 How to cite this: Liao Z, Liao F. Effect of early pulmonary rehabilitation therapy on the pulmonary function of patients with stroke-associated pneumonia and analysis of its effectiveness. Pak J Med Sci. 2024;40(7):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.7.8113 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
早期肺康复治疗对脑卒中相关肺炎患者肺功能的影响及其有效性分析
研究目的本研究旨在评估早期肺康复(PR)治疗方法对卒中相关肺炎(SAP)的临床疗效。方法: 这是一项前瞻性随机对照干预研究:这是一项前瞻性随机对照干预研究。选取2020年6月至2021年12月柳州市人民医院康复科收治的80例SAP患者,采用随机数字表法分为干预组(40例)和对照组(40例)。两组患者均接受常规治疗。干预组患者接受早期 PR 干预,对照组患者接受常规康复治疗。比较了临床疗效和肺功能指标。结果显示与对照组相比,干预组患者治疗后在重症监护室的住院时间、症状缓解时间和机械通气时间均短于对照组(P < 0.05)。治疗组干预后的临床总有效率为 82.50%,明显高于对照组的 47.50%(P < 0.05)。治疗 21 天后,干预组的一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)/预测值为 64.92 ± 8.53,而对照组为 52.69 ± 7.08。干预组的一秒钟呼吸容积(FEV1)/预测值为(59.73 ± 7.18),而对照组为(50.36 ± 6.54)。干预组的临床肺部感染评分为 2.62 ± 1.13,而对照组为 4.17 ± 2.08。干预组的肺功能明显改善,与对照组相比,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。此外,与对照组相比,干预组的白细胞介素-4 和白细胞介素-10 水平明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在治疗后第二周和第三周,干预组的国家健康研究所卒中量表平均得分明显低于对照组(P < 0.05)。结论早期综合肺康复可明显改善 SAP 患者的肺功能和呼吸状况,促进脑功能的早期恢复。与传统的肺康复相比,这种方法的疗效明显更好,因此值得临床推广:Liao Z, Liao F. 早期肺康复治疗对脑卒中相关性肺炎患者肺功能的影响及效果分析。Pak J Med Sci. 2024;40(7):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.7.8113 这是一篇开放获取的文章,根据知识共享署名许可协议(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)的条款发布,该协议允许在任何媒体上不受限制地使用、分发和复制,但须适当引用原作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信