Results of petrographic analysis of stone assemblage from the Kosa Mesolithic sites (Northern Kama region)

E. L. Lychagina, D. A. Demakov, M. A. Kulkova, E. M. Tomilina, N. Batueva
{"title":"Results of petrographic analysis of stone assemblage from the Kosa Mesolithic sites (Northern Kama region)","authors":"E. L. Lychagina, D. A. Demakov, M. A. Kulkova, E. M. Tomilina, N. Batueva","doi":"10.20874/2071-0437-2024-65-2-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the results of petrographic analysis of stone materials from the Mesolithic sites of Kosa 1–3 in the northern Kama River area (Perm Region) are discussed. The sites of Kosa 1 and 2 are located on the second terraces of the Lolog and Kosa Rivers, and Kosa 3 — on the first terrace of the Kosa River. Kosa 1 and 2 are considered chronologically similar and belong to the Late Mesolithic period. The site of Kosa 3 is younger, and it marks the transition from the Mesolithic to the Neolithic. For the analysis, aimed at determining the ancient raw material strategies, selected were five stone artifacts from Kosa 1, five stone artifacts from Kosa 2, and eight samples from Kosa 3. Polarised microscopy was used for the petrographic study of stones in thin sections. This method allows the precise diagnosis of minerals and rocks based on their optical characteristics. The results indi-cate that flint and jasper were applied as main raw materials at all analysed sites. The choice of material for the stone industry at the sites was limited. Sandstone and siltstone were used for production of stone macro tools. The difference in raw source materials was determined for the Kosa 1 and Kosa 2 sites on one hand, and Kosa 3 on another — the main raw sources at the Mesolithic sites were flint and jasper, while at the Kosa 3 transitional site coloured pebbly flint was used. The comparison of the results with petrographic data from other Mesolithic sites of this region demonstrates similarity in the main principles of the strategy of raw source choices such as using flint and jasper. Furthermore, a larger variety of source raw materials has been determined for the sites of the Middle Kama River basin. The comparison with the results from the Late Stone Age sites also revealed a greater variety in the materials used in comparison with the Kosinsk sites (platy flints, cherts, tuffs, gabbro, and others). All raw materials were of local origin such as alluvial deposits of the Lolog and Kosa Rivers. The results of the petrographic analysis suggest the situational choice of materials for the manufacture of tools by the local population, with the main factor being their easy accessibility.","PeriodicalId":506530,"journal":{"name":"VESTNIK ARHEOLOGII, ANTROPOLOGII I ETNOGRAFII","volume":"9 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VESTNIK ARHEOLOGII, ANTROPOLOGII I ETNOGRAFII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2024-65-2-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, the results of petrographic analysis of stone materials from the Mesolithic sites of Kosa 1–3 in the northern Kama River area (Perm Region) are discussed. The sites of Kosa 1 and 2 are located on the second terraces of the Lolog and Kosa Rivers, and Kosa 3 — on the first terrace of the Kosa River. Kosa 1 and 2 are considered chronologically similar and belong to the Late Mesolithic period. The site of Kosa 3 is younger, and it marks the transition from the Mesolithic to the Neolithic. For the analysis, aimed at determining the ancient raw material strategies, selected were five stone artifacts from Kosa 1, five stone artifacts from Kosa 2, and eight samples from Kosa 3. Polarised microscopy was used for the petrographic study of stones in thin sections. This method allows the precise diagnosis of minerals and rocks based on their optical characteristics. The results indi-cate that flint and jasper were applied as main raw materials at all analysed sites. The choice of material for the stone industry at the sites was limited. Sandstone and siltstone were used for production of stone macro tools. The difference in raw source materials was determined for the Kosa 1 and Kosa 2 sites on one hand, and Kosa 3 on another — the main raw sources at the Mesolithic sites were flint and jasper, while at the Kosa 3 transitional site coloured pebbly flint was used. The comparison of the results with petrographic data from other Mesolithic sites of this region demonstrates similarity in the main principles of the strategy of raw source choices such as using flint and jasper. Furthermore, a larger variety of source raw materials has been determined for the sites of the Middle Kama River basin. The comparison with the results from the Late Stone Age sites also revealed a greater variety in the materials used in comparison with the Kosinsk sites (platy flints, cherts, tuffs, gabbro, and others). All raw materials were of local origin such as alluvial deposits of the Lolog and Kosa Rivers. The results of the petrographic analysis suggest the situational choice of materials for the manufacture of tools by the local population, with the main factor being their easy accessibility.
科萨中石器时代遗址(北卡马地区)石器组合的岩石学分析结果
本文讨论了对卡马河北部地区(彼尔姆地区)科萨1-3号中石器时代遗址的石料进行岩相分析的结果。科萨 1 号和 2 号遗址位于洛洛河和科萨河的第二阶地,科萨 3 号遗址位于科萨河的第一阶地。科萨 1 号和 2 号遗址在年代上相似,属于中石器时代晚期。科萨 3 号遗址年代较早,是中石器时代向新石器时代过渡的标志。分析的目的是确定古代原材料战略,选取了科萨 1 号遗址的 5 件石器、科萨 2 号遗址的 5 件石器和科萨 3 号遗址的 8 件石器样本。这种方法可以根据矿物和岩石的光学特征对其进行精确诊断。结果表明,燧石和碧玉是所有分析地点的主要原材料。这些遗址的石料选择有限。砂岩和粉砂岩被用于制作石制宏观工具。原材料的不同一方面体现在科萨 1 号和科萨 2 号遗址,另一方面体现在科萨 3 号遗址--中石器时代遗址的主要原材料是燧石和碧玉,而科萨 3 号过渡时期遗址则使用彩色卵石燧石。将研究结果与该地区其他中石器时代遗址的岩相学数据进行比较后发现,使用燧石和碧玉等原料来源选择策略的主要原则具有相似性。此外,在卡马河中游流域的遗址中还发现了更多种类的原料来源。通过与石器时代晚期遗址的结果进行比较,还发现与科辛斯克遗址(板状燧石、白垩岩、凝灰岩、辉长岩等)相比,所使用的材料种类更多。所有原材料都来自当地,如洛洛河和科萨河的冲积层。岩相分析的结果表明,当地人在制造工具时对材料的选择是因地制宜的,主要因素是这些材料易于获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信