Impact of index admission cholecystectomy vs interval cholecystectomy on readmission rate in acute cholangitis: National Readmission Database survey

A. Sohail, Ahmed Shehadah, Ammad J. Chaudhary, Khadija Naseem, Amna Iqbal, Ahmad Khan, Shailendra Singh
{"title":"Impact of index admission cholecystectomy vs interval cholecystectomy on readmission rate in acute cholangitis: National Readmission Database survey","authors":"A. Sohail, Ahmed Shehadah, Ammad J. Chaudhary, Khadija Naseem, Amna Iqbal, Ahmad Khan, Shailendra Singh","doi":"10.4253/wjge.v16.i6.350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\n Elective cholecystectomy (CCY) is recommended for patients with gallstone-related acute cholangitis (AC) following endoscopic decompression to prevent recurrent biliary events. However, the optimal timing and implications of CCY remain unclear.\n AIM\n To examine the impact of same-admission CCY compared to interval CCY on patients with gallstone-related AC using the National Readmission Database (NRD).\n METHODS\n We queried the NRD to identify all gallstone-related AC hospitalizations in adult patients with and without the same admission CCY between 2016 and 2020. Our primary outcome was all-cause 30-d readmission rates, and secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization cost.\n RESULTS\n Among the 124964 gallstone-related AC hospitalizations, only 14.67% underwent the same admission CCY. The all-cause 30-d readmissions in the same admission CCY group were almost half that of the non-CCY group (5.56% vs 11.50%). Patients in the same admission CCY group had a longer mean LOS and higher hospitalization costs attributable to surgery. Although the most common reason for readmission was sepsis in both groups, the second most common reason was AC in the interval CCY group.\n CONCLUSION\n Our study suggests that patients with gallstone-related AC who do not undergo the same admission CCY have twice the risk of readmission compared to those who undergo CCY during the same admission. These readmissions can potentially be prevented by performing same-admission CCY in appropriate patients, which may reduce subsequent hospitalization costs secondary to readmissions.","PeriodicalId":506333,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v16.i6.350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Elective cholecystectomy (CCY) is recommended for patients with gallstone-related acute cholangitis (AC) following endoscopic decompression to prevent recurrent biliary events. However, the optimal timing and implications of CCY remain unclear. AIM To examine the impact of same-admission CCY compared to interval CCY on patients with gallstone-related AC using the National Readmission Database (NRD). METHODS We queried the NRD to identify all gallstone-related AC hospitalizations in adult patients with and without the same admission CCY between 2016 and 2020. Our primary outcome was all-cause 30-d readmission rates, and secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization cost. RESULTS Among the 124964 gallstone-related AC hospitalizations, only 14.67% underwent the same admission CCY. The all-cause 30-d readmissions in the same admission CCY group were almost half that of the non-CCY group (5.56% vs 11.50%). Patients in the same admission CCY group had a longer mean LOS and higher hospitalization costs attributable to surgery. Although the most common reason for readmission was sepsis in both groups, the second most common reason was AC in the interval CCY group. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that patients with gallstone-related AC who do not undergo the same admission CCY have twice the risk of readmission compared to those who undergo CCY during the same admission. These readmissions can potentially be prevented by performing same-admission CCY in appropriate patients, which may reduce subsequent hospitalization costs secondary to readmissions.
指标入院胆囊切除术与间歇期胆囊切除术对急性胆管炎再入院率的影响:全国再入院数据库调查
背景:内镜减压术后,建议对胆石相关急性胆管炎(AC)患者进行选择性胆囊切除术(CCY),以防止胆道事件再次发生。然而,CCY 的最佳时机和影响仍不明确。目的 利用国家再入院数据库(NRD)研究同入院 CCY 与间隔 CCY 相比对胆石相关急性胆管炎患者的影响。方法 我们对 NRD 进行了查询,以确定 2016 年至 2020 年间所有胆结石相关 AC 住院成人患者中使用和未使用同一入院 CCY 的情况。我们的主要结果是全因 30 天再入院率,次要结果包括院内死亡率、住院时间(LOS)和住院费用。结果 在 124964 例胆结石相关 AC 住院病例中,只有 14.67% 接受了相同的入院 CCY。同一入院CCY组患者30天内的全因再入院率几乎是非CCY组的一半(5.56% vs 11.50%)。同一入院CCY组患者的平均住院时间更长,手术导致的住院费用更高。虽然两组患者最常见的再入院原因都是败血症,但间隔 CCY 组患者第二常见的原因是 AC。结论 我们的研究表明,胆结石相关 AC 患者如果没有在同一入院时间内接受 CCY,其再入院风险是在同一入院时间内接受 CCY 的患者的两倍。通过对合适的患者进行同入院CCY,有可能避免这些再入院情况的发生,从而减少因再入院而导致的后续住院费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信