Logistics service failures and recovery strategies: is the response time or the discount amount more important?

Hasan Emin Gurler, Ramazan Erturgut
{"title":"Logistics service failures and recovery strategies: is the response time or the discount amount more important?","authors":"Hasan Emin Gurler, Ramazan Erturgut","doi":"10.1108/mip-07-2023-0372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeAlthough trade volumes in e-retailing have increased significantly in recent years, logistics service failures are inevitable, especially at the delivery stage. Therefore, it is essential to provide customers with effective recovery strategies to increase their satisfaction and repurchase intentions. There is a lack of empirical evidence on whether the response time or the discount offered in compensation is more crucial for customers. Therefore, this study aims to determine whether the response time or the discount offered for high and low criticality failures has a greater impact on customer satisfaction levels and repurchase intentions for female and male customers.Design/methodology/approachA scenario-based experimental design method has been adopted to collect data, and 697 participants aged 18 and 58 years have been reached. The research utilized a between-subjects design, incorporating three factors: gender (female vs male), criticality (high vs low) and compensation (7 days: 10% discount, 10 days: 20% discount and 14 days: 30% discount). Six scenarios depicting the failure of an online retailer were created, and factorial univariate ANOVA was conducted to test the hypotheses.FindingsThe study's results show that in terms of customer satisfaction, female customers attach more importance to the response time in the case of high criticality and the amount of discount offered in the case of low criticality. On the other hand, male customers give more importance to the response time in terms of customer satisfaction when they experience a high or low criticality failure. In the case of low criticality, response time is more important for male customers to increase their repurchase intentions, while the amount of the discount is more important for female customers.Originality/valueThe study demonstrates the relative importance of the response time and discount amount according to the criticality level of failures and to guide business managers in terms of the recovery strategies they will implement. It focuses on gender differences and determine whether the response time or discount amount is more important for male and female customers in high or low-criticality situations.","PeriodicalId":402197,"journal":{"name":"Marketing Intelligence & Planning","volume":"1 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marketing Intelligence & Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-07-2023-0372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeAlthough trade volumes in e-retailing have increased significantly in recent years, logistics service failures are inevitable, especially at the delivery stage. Therefore, it is essential to provide customers with effective recovery strategies to increase their satisfaction and repurchase intentions. There is a lack of empirical evidence on whether the response time or the discount offered in compensation is more crucial for customers. Therefore, this study aims to determine whether the response time or the discount offered for high and low criticality failures has a greater impact on customer satisfaction levels and repurchase intentions for female and male customers.Design/methodology/approachA scenario-based experimental design method has been adopted to collect data, and 697 participants aged 18 and 58 years have been reached. The research utilized a between-subjects design, incorporating three factors: gender (female vs male), criticality (high vs low) and compensation (7 days: 10% discount, 10 days: 20% discount and 14 days: 30% discount). Six scenarios depicting the failure of an online retailer were created, and factorial univariate ANOVA was conducted to test the hypotheses.FindingsThe study's results show that in terms of customer satisfaction, female customers attach more importance to the response time in the case of high criticality and the amount of discount offered in the case of low criticality. On the other hand, male customers give more importance to the response time in terms of customer satisfaction when they experience a high or low criticality failure. In the case of low criticality, response time is more important for male customers to increase their repurchase intentions, while the amount of the discount is more important for female customers.Originality/valueThe study demonstrates the relative importance of the response time and discount amount according to the criticality level of failures and to guide business managers in terms of the recovery strategies they will implement. It focuses on gender differences and determine whether the response time or discount amount is more important for male and female customers in high or low-criticality situations.
物流服务故障和恢复策略:响应时间更重要还是折扣金额更重要?
目的虽然近年来网络零售的交易量大幅增长,但物流服务故障在所难免,尤其是在交付阶段。因此,必须为顾客提供有效的补偿策略,以提高他们的满意度和再购买意愿。对于顾客来说,响应时间更重要还是提供的折扣补偿更重要,目前还缺乏实证证据。因此,本研究旨在确定高临界故障和低临界故障的响应时间或提供的折扣对女性和男性顾客的满意度水平和再购意向是否有更大的影响。设计/方法/途径采用基于情景的实验设计方法收集数据,共接触了 697 名年龄在 18 岁和 58 岁之间的参与者。研究采用了主体间设计,纳入了三个因素:性别(女性 vs 男性)、关键度(高 vs 低)和补偿(7 天:9 折、10 天:8 折和 14 天:7 折)。研究结果表明,在顾客满意度方面,女性顾客更重视高临界度情况下的响应时间和低临界度情况下的折扣金额。另一方面,男性顾客在遇到高危急性或低危急性故障时,在顾客满意度方面更看重响应时间。在低临界度的情况下,响应时间对男性顾客提高再次购买意愿更重要,而折扣金额对女性顾客更重要。 原创性/价值 该研究证明了响应时间和折扣金额在不同故障临界度下的相对重要性,并为企业管理者实施恢复策略提供指导。研究重点关注性别差异,并确定在高危或低危情况下,响应时间或折扣金额对男性和女性客户更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信