Early onset metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia

Q3 Medicine
A. Jalali , S. Smith , G. Kim , H. Wong , M. Lee , J. Yeung , M. Loft , R. Wong , J.D. Shapiro , S. Kosmider , J. Tie , S. Ananda , B. Ma , M. Burge , R. Jennens , B. Lee , J. Johns , L. Lim , A. Dean , L. Nott , P. Gibbs
{"title":"Early onset metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia","authors":"A. Jalali ,&nbsp;S. Smith ,&nbsp;G. Kim ,&nbsp;H. Wong ,&nbsp;M. Lee ,&nbsp;J. Yeung ,&nbsp;M. Loft ,&nbsp;R. Wong ,&nbsp;J.D. Shapiro ,&nbsp;S. Kosmider ,&nbsp;J. Tie ,&nbsp;S. Ananda ,&nbsp;B. Ma ,&nbsp;M. Burge ,&nbsp;R. Jennens ,&nbsp;B. Lee ,&nbsp;J. Johns ,&nbsp;L. Lim ,&nbsp;A. Dean ,&nbsp;L. Nott ,&nbsp;P. Gibbs","doi":"10.1016/j.ctarc.2024.100827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality rates have been increasing among young patients (YP), for uncertain reasons. It is unclear whether YP have a distinct tumor biology or merit a different treatment approach to older patients (OP).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We reviewed prospectively collected data from consecutive patients with metastatic CRC (MCRC) enrolled in the multi-site Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer (TRACC) Australian registry. Clinicopathological features, treatment and survival outcomes were compared between YP (&lt;50 years) and OP (≥50 years).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 3692 patients diagnosed August 2009 - March 2023, 14 % (513) were YP. YP were more likely than OP to be female (52% vs. 40 %, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001), have ECOG performance status 0–1 (94% vs. 81 %, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001), to have a left-sided primary (72% vs. 63 %, <em>P</em> = 0.0008) and to have fewer comorbidities (90% vs. 60 % Charleston score 0, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). There were no differences in the available molecular status, which was more complete in YP. YP were more likely to have de novo metastatic disease (71% vs. 57 %, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). YP were more likely to undergo curative hepatic resection (27% vs. 17 %, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001), to receive any chemotherapy (93% vs. 78 % (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001), and to receive 3+ lines of chemotherapy (30% vs. 24 % (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0034)). Median first-line progression free survival (10.2 versus 10.6 months) was similar for YP vs OP, but overall survival (32.1 versus 25.4 months, HR = 0.745, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) was longer in YP.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Known prognostic variables mostly favored YP versus OP with newly diagnosed mCRC, who were also more heavily treated. Consistent with this, overall survival outcomes were improved. This data does not support that CRC in YP represent a distinct subset of mCRC patients, or that a modified treatment approach is warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9507,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment and research communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246829422400039X/pdfft?md5=ae7bbb9db3be665da9f27da6302a81ed&pid=1-s2.0-S246829422400039X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment and research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246829422400039X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality rates have been increasing among young patients (YP), for uncertain reasons. It is unclear whether YP have a distinct tumor biology or merit a different treatment approach to older patients (OP).

Methods

We reviewed prospectively collected data from consecutive patients with metastatic CRC (MCRC) enrolled in the multi-site Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer (TRACC) Australian registry. Clinicopathological features, treatment and survival outcomes were compared between YP (<50 years) and OP (≥50 years).

Results

Of 3692 patients diagnosed August 2009 - March 2023, 14 % (513) were YP. YP were more likely than OP to be female (52% vs. 40 %, P < 0.0001), have ECOG performance status 0–1 (94% vs. 81 %, P < 0.0001), to have a left-sided primary (72% vs. 63 %, P = 0.0008) and to have fewer comorbidities (90% vs. 60 % Charleston score 0, P < 0.0001). There were no differences in the available molecular status, which was more complete in YP. YP were more likely to have de novo metastatic disease (71% vs. 57 %, P < 0.0001). YP were more likely to undergo curative hepatic resection (27% vs. 17 %, P < 0.0001), to receive any chemotherapy (93% vs. 78 % (P < 0.0001), and to receive 3+ lines of chemotherapy (30% vs. 24 % (P < 0.0034)). Median first-line progression free survival (10.2 versus 10.6 months) was similar for YP vs OP, but overall survival (32.1 versus 25.4 months, HR = 0.745, P < 0.0001) was longer in YP.

Conclusion

Known prognostic variables mostly favored YP versus OP with newly diagnosed mCRC, who were also more heavily treated. Consistent with this, overall survival outcomes were improved. This data does not support that CRC in YP represent a distinct subset of mCRC patients, or that a modified treatment approach is warranted.

澳大利亚的早发转移性结直肠癌
背景年轻患者(YP)的直肠癌(CRC)发病率和死亡率不断上升,原因不明。我们回顾了澳大利亚复发性和晚期结直肠癌治疗(TRACC)多站点登记中连续登记的转移性结直肠癌(MCRC)患者的前瞻性数据。结果 在2009年8月至2023年3月确诊的3692名患者中,14%(513人)为青年患者。与 OP 相比,YP 更有可能是女性(52% 对 40%,P < 0.0001)、ECOG 表现状态为 0-1 (94% 对 81%,P < 0.0001)、左侧原发性(72% 对 63%,P = 0.0008)和较少合并症(90% 对 60% 查尔斯顿评分 0,P < 0.0001)。可获得的分子状况没有差异,青年患者的分子状况更全面。青年患者更有可能患有新发转移性疾病(71% 对 57%,P < 0.0001)。青年患者更有可能接受根治性肝切除术(27% 对 17%,P< 0.0001),更有可能接受任何化疗(93% 对 78%,P< 0.0001),更有可能接受 3 线以上化疗(30% 对 24%,P< 0.0034)。YP与OP的中位一线无进展生存期(10.2个月对10.6个月)相似,但YP的总生存期(32.1个月对25.4个月,HR=0.745,P< 0.0001)更长。与此相一致的是,总生存期也得到了改善。这些数据并不证明青年患者中的 CRC 是 mCRC 患者中的一个独特亚群,也不证明需要改变治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Treatment and Research Communications is an international peer-reviewed publication dedicated to providing comprehensive basic, translational, and clinical oncology research. The journal is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, policy, and treatment of cancer and provides a global forum for the nurturing and development of future generations of oncology scientists. Cancer Treatment and Research Communications publishes comprehensive reviews and original studies describing various aspects of basic through clinical research of all tumor types. The journal also accepts clinical studies in oncology, with an emphasis on prospective early phase clinical trials. Specific areas of interest include basic, translational, and clinical research and mechanistic approaches; cancer biology; molecular carcinogenesis; genetics and genomics; stem cell and developmental biology; immunology; molecular and cellular oncology; systems biology; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; cancer policy; and integration of various approaches. Our mission is to be the premier source of relevant information through promoting excellence in research and facilitating the timely translation of that science to health care and clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信