Perinatal care among Hispanic birthing people: Differences by primary language and state policy environment

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Julia D. Interrante PhD, MPH, Cynthia Pando MA, Alyssa H. Fritz MPH, RD, CLC, Katy B. Kozhimannil PhD, MPA
{"title":"Perinatal care among Hispanic birthing people: Differences by primary language and state policy environment","authors":"Julia D. Interrante PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Cynthia Pando MA,&nbsp;Alyssa H. Fritz MPH, RD, CLC,&nbsp;Katy B. Kozhimannil PhD, MPA","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The study aims to examine maternal care among Hispanic birthing people by primary language and state policy environment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Sources and Study Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Pooled data from 2016 to 2020 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System surveys from 44 states and two jurisdictions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design</h3>\n \n <p>Using multivariable logistic regression, we calculated adjusted predicted probabilities of maternal care utilization (visit attendance, timeliness, adequacy) and quality (receipt of guideline-recommended care components). We examined outcomes by primary language (Spanish, English) and two binary measures of state policy environment: (1) expanded Medicaid eligibility to those &lt;133% Federal Poverty Level, (2) waived five-year waiting period for pregnant immigrants to access Medicaid.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Collection/Extraction Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Survey responses from 35,779 postpartum individuals with self-reported Hispanic ethnicity who gave birth during 2016–2020.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Principal Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Compared to English-speaking Hispanic people, Spanish-speaking individuals reported lower preconception care attendance and worse timeliness and adequacy of prenatal care.</p>\n \n <p>In states without Medicaid expansion and immigrant Medicaid coverage, Hispanic birthing people had, respectively, 2.3 (95% CI:0.6, 3.9) and 3.1 (95% CI:1.6, 4.6) percentage-point lower postpartum care attendance and 4.2 (95% CI:2.1, 6.3) and 9.2 (95% CI:7.2, 11.2) percentage-point lower prenatal care quality than people in states with these policies.</p>\n \n <p>In states with these policies, Spanish-speaking Hispanic people had 3.3 (95% CI:1.3, 5.4) and 3.0 (95% CI:0.9, 5.1) percentage-point lower prenatal care adequacy, but 1.3 (95% CI:−1.1, 3.6) and 2.7 (95% CI:0.2, 5.1) percentage-point higher postpartum care quality than English-speaking Hispanic people. In states without these policies, those same comparisons were 7.3 (95% CI:3.8, 10.8) and 7.9 (95% CI:4.6, 11.1) percentage-points lower and 9.6 (95% CI:5.5, 13.7) and 5.3 (95% CI:1.8, 8.9) percentage-points higher.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Perinatal care utilization and quality vary among Hispanic birthing people by primary language and state policy environment. States with Medicaid expansion and immigrant Medicaid coverage had greater equity between Spanish-speaking and English-speaking Hispanic people in adequate prenatal care and postpartum care quality among those who gave birth.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":"59 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-6773.14339","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6773.14339","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The study aims to examine maternal care among Hispanic birthing people by primary language and state policy environment.

Data Sources and Study Setting

Pooled data from 2016 to 2020 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System surveys from 44 states and two jurisdictions.

Study Design

Using multivariable logistic regression, we calculated adjusted predicted probabilities of maternal care utilization (visit attendance, timeliness, adequacy) and quality (receipt of guideline-recommended care components). We examined outcomes by primary language (Spanish, English) and two binary measures of state policy environment: (1) expanded Medicaid eligibility to those <133% Federal Poverty Level, (2) waived five-year waiting period for pregnant immigrants to access Medicaid.

Data Collection/Extraction Methods

Survey responses from 35,779 postpartum individuals with self-reported Hispanic ethnicity who gave birth during 2016–2020.

Principal Findings

Compared to English-speaking Hispanic people, Spanish-speaking individuals reported lower preconception care attendance and worse timeliness and adequacy of prenatal care.

In states without Medicaid expansion and immigrant Medicaid coverage, Hispanic birthing people had, respectively, 2.3 (95% CI:0.6, 3.9) and 3.1 (95% CI:1.6, 4.6) percentage-point lower postpartum care attendance and 4.2 (95% CI:2.1, 6.3) and 9.2 (95% CI:7.2, 11.2) percentage-point lower prenatal care quality than people in states with these policies.

In states with these policies, Spanish-speaking Hispanic people had 3.3 (95% CI:1.3, 5.4) and 3.0 (95% CI:0.9, 5.1) percentage-point lower prenatal care adequacy, but 1.3 (95% CI:−1.1, 3.6) and 2.7 (95% CI:0.2, 5.1) percentage-point higher postpartum care quality than English-speaking Hispanic people. In states without these policies, those same comparisons were 7.3 (95% CI:3.8, 10.8) and 7.9 (95% CI:4.6, 11.1) percentage-points lower and 9.6 (95% CI:5.5, 13.7) and 5.3 (95% CI:1.8, 8.9) percentage-points higher.

Conclusions

Perinatal care utilization and quality vary among Hispanic birthing people by primary language and state policy environment. States with Medicaid expansion and immigrant Medicaid coverage had greater equity between Spanish-speaking and English-speaking Hispanic people in adequate prenatal care and postpartum care quality among those who gave birth.

Abstract Image

西班牙裔产妇的围产期护理:主要语言和州政策环境的差异。
研究目的该研究旨在根据主要语言和州政策环境,研究西班牙裔分娩人群的产妇护理情况:研究设计:利用多变量逻辑回归,我们计算了产妇护理利用率(就诊率、及时性、充分性)和质量(接受指南推荐的护理内容)的调整预测概率。我们按照主要语言(西班牙语、英语)和州政策环境的两个二元衡量标准对结果进行了研究:(1)将医疗补助资格扩大到那些数据收集/提取方法:调查回答来自 35779 名自我报告为西班牙裔的产后人士,他们都是在 2016-2020 年期间分娩的:与讲英语的西班牙裔人相比,讲西班牙语的人报告的孕前保健就诊率较低,产前保健的及时性和充分性较差。在没有扩大医疗补助计划和移民医疗补助计划覆盖范围的州,与实行这些政策的州相比,西班牙裔分娩者的产后护理就诊率分别低 2.3 (95% CI:0.6, 3.9) 和 3.1 (95% CI:1.6, 4.6)个百分点,产前护理质量分别低 4.2 (95% CI:2.1, 6.3) 和 9.2 (95% CI:7.2, 11.2)个百分点。在实行这些政策的州,讲西班牙语的西语裔人群的产前护理充分性比讲英语的西语裔人群低 3.3 (95% CI:1.3, 5.4) 和 3.0 (95% CI:0.9, 5.1)个百分点,但产后护理质量比讲英语的西语裔人群高 1.3 (95% CI:-1.1, 3.6) 和 2.7 (95% CI:0.2, 5.1)个百分点。在没有这些政策的州,同样的比较结果是:低 7.3 (95% CI:3.8, 10.8) 和 7.9 (95% CI:4.6, 11.1) 个百分点,高 9.6 (95% CI:5.5, 13.7) 和 5.3 (95% CI:1.8, 8.9) 个百分点:西语裔分娩者的围产期保健利用率和质量因主要语言和州政策环境而异。在扩大了医疗补助计划和移民医疗补助计划覆盖范围的州,讲西班牙语和讲英语的拉美裔产妇在充分的产前护理和产后护理质量方面更加平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信