Minimizing tearing during vaginal delivery with a perineal protection device: a randomized controlled trial

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
{"title":"Minimizing tearing during vaginal delivery with a perineal protection device: a randomized controlled trial","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><p>There is a growing body of evidence indicating that second-degree tears cause both short- and long-term consequences. Very few preventative measures have been found to reduce the incidence of these tears.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>This study aimed to investigate whether the use of a perineal protection device during vaginal birth reduces severe perineal tearing (grade ≥2 tear) in primiparous women compared with routine manual perineal support.</p></div><div><h3>STUDY DESIGN</h3><p>A single-center randomized controlled trial was conducted in Sweden from 2019 to 2021. Primiparous women at term were randomly allocated to the intervention group (n=43), where a perineal protection device was used, or to the routine care group (n=49). The primary outcome was grade of perineal tear. The secondary outcomes were vaginal and labial tearing. Continuous data were analyzed using the Student <em>t</em> test or Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test. Dichotomous data were analyzed using the Pearson <em>X<sup>2</sup></em> test, Fisher exact test, and ordinal logistic regression.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>Women in the intervention group had a significantly lower risk of sustaining more extensive perineal tearing than those in the control group. The use of the perineal protection device decreased the risk of grade ≥2 tears in relation to grade 0 to 1 tears (odds ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.17–0.94). Ordinal logistic regression analyses revealed an odds ratio of 0.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.16–0.81) per incremetn of grade injury using the perineal protection device vs routine care (<em>P</em>=.013). The number needed to treat using the perineal protection device was 4.3 to avoid 1 grade ≥2 tear. Women in the treatment group showed less labial tearing (<em>P</em>=.016). No adverse effect was detected.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><p>The use of a perineal protection device reduced the risk of grade ≥2 perineal tearing by 60% and labial tearing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589933324001289/pdfft?md5=593e99cc73e4cf1439e28e6e46f1a9a5&pid=1-s2.0-S2589933324001289-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589933324001289","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a growing body of evidence indicating that second-degree tears cause both short- and long-term consequences. Very few preventative measures have been found to reduce the incidence of these tears.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether the use of a perineal protection device during vaginal birth reduces severe perineal tearing (grade ≥2 tear) in primiparous women compared with routine manual perineal support.

STUDY DESIGN

A single-center randomized controlled trial was conducted in Sweden from 2019 to 2021. Primiparous women at term were randomly allocated to the intervention group (n=43), where a perineal protection device was used, or to the routine care group (n=49). The primary outcome was grade of perineal tear. The secondary outcomes were vaginal and labial tearing. Continuous data were analyzed using the Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Dichotomous data were analyzed using the Pearson X2 test, Fisher exact test, and ordinal logistic regression.

RESULTS

Women in the intervention group had a significantly lower risk of sustaining more extensive perineal tearing than those in the control group. The use of the perineal protection device decreased the risk of grade ≥2 tears in relation to grade 0 to 1 tears (odds ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.17–0.94). Ordinal logistic regression analyses revealed an odds ratio of 0.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.16–0.81) per incremetn of grade injury using the perineal protection device vs routine care (P=.013). The number needed to treat using the perineal protection device was 4.3 to avoid 1 grade ≥2 tear. Women in the treatment group showed less labial tearing (P=.016). No adverse effect was detected.

CONCLUSION

The use of a perineal protection device reduced the risk of grade ≥2 perineal tearing by 60% and labial tearing.

使用会阴保护装置减少阴道分娩时的撕裂 - 随机对照试验。
背景:越来越多的证据表明,二度撕裂会造成短期和长期的后果。但很少有预防措施能降低这种撕裂的发生率:研究设计:研究设计:2019-2021年在瑞典进行了一项单中心随机对照试验。初产妇被随机分配到使用会阴保护装置的干预组(43人)或接受常规护理的干预组(49人)。主要结果是会阴撕裂等级。次要结果是阴道和阴唇撕裂。连续数据采用学生 T 检验或 Mann-Whitney U 检验进行分析。二分法数据采用皮尔逊 X2 检验、费雪精确检验和序数逻辑回归进行分析:结果:与对照组相比,干预组妇女发生更大面积会阴撕裂的风险明显降低。与 0-1 级撕裂相比,使用会阴保护装置可降低≥2 级撕裂的风险(OR 0.40 [95% CI 0.17-0.94])。顺序逻辑回归分析显示,使用会阴保护装置与对照组相比,一级损伤的增加率为 0.36 (0.16-0.81)(P=0.013)。使用会阴保护装置避免一次≥2 级撕裂所需的治疗次数为 4.3。治疗组妇女的阴唇撕裂较少(P=0.016)。未发现任何不良反应:使用会阴保护装置将会阴撕裂≥2级的风险降低了60%,同时也降低了阴唇撕裂的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
254
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a highly esteemed publication with two companion titles. One of these is the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine (AJOG MFM), which is dedicated to the latest research in the field of maternal-fetal medicine, specifically concerning high-risk pregnancies. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including: Maternal Complications: It addresses significant studies that have the potential to change clinical practice regarding complications faced by pregnant women. Fetal Complications: The journal covers prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound, and genetic issues related to the fetus, providing insights into the management and care of fetal health. Prenatal Care: It discusses the best practices in prenatal care to ensure the health and well-being of both the mother and the unborn child. Intrapartum Care: It provides guidance on the care provided during the childbirth process, which is critical for the safety of both mother and baby. Postpartum Issues: The journal also tackles issues that arise after childbirth, focusing on the postpartum period and its implications for maternal health. AJOG MFM serves as a reliable forum for peer-reviewed research, with a preference for randomized trials and meta-analyses. The goal is to equip researchers and clinicians with the most current information and evidence-based strategies to effectively manage high-risk pregnancies and to provide the best possible care for mothers and their unborn children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信