Serratus anterior plane block improves pain and incentive spirometry volumes in trauma patients with multiple rib fractures: a prospective cohort study.

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Pub Date : 2024-06-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2023-001183
Victor Sadauskas, Mariame Fofana, Dalton Brunson, Jeff Choi, David Spain, James V Quinn, Youyou Duanmu
{"title":"Serratus anterior plane block improves pain and incentive spirometry volumes in trauma patients with multiple rib fractures: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Victor Sadauskas, Mariame Fofana, Dalton Brunson, Jeff Choi, David Spain, James V Quinn, Youyou Duanmu","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2023-001183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rib fractures are common injuries associated with considerable morbidity, long-term disability, and mortality. Early, adequate analgesia is important to mitigate complications such as pneumonia and respiratory failure. Regional anesthesia has been proposed for rib fracture pain control due to its superior side effect profile compared with systemic analgesia. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of emergency physician-performed, ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) on pain and respiratory function in emergency department patients with multiple acute rib fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective observational cohort study of adult patients at a level 1 trauma center who had two or more acute unilateral rib fractures. Eligible patients received a SAPB if an emergency physician trained in the procedure was available at the time of diagnosis. Primary outcomes were the absolute change in pain scores and percent change in expected incentive spirometry volumes from baseline to 3 hours after rib fracture diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>38 patients met eligibility criteria, 15 received the SAPB and 23 did not. The SAPB group had a greater decrease in pain scores at 3 hours (-3.7 vs. -0.9; p=0.003) compared with the non-SAPB group. The SAPB group also had an 11% (CI 1.5% to 17%) increase in percent expected spirometry volumes at 3 hours which was significantly better than the non-SAPB group, which had a -3% (CI -9.1% to 2.7%) decrease (p=0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with rib fractures who received SAPB as part of a multimodal pain control strategy had a greater improvement in pain and respiratory function compared with those who did not. Larger trials are indicated to assess the generalizability of these initial findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e001183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11177771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2023-001183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rib fractures are common injuries associated with considerable morbidity, long-term disability, and mortality. Early, adequate analgesia is important to mitigate complications such as pneumonia and respiratory failure. Regional anesthesia has been proposed for rib fracture pain control due to its superior side effect profile compared with systemic analgesia. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of emergency physician-performed, ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) on pain and respiratory function in emergency department patients with multiple acute rib fractures.

Methods: This was a prospective observational cohort study of adult patients at a level 1 trauma center who had two or more acute unilateral rib fractures. Eligible patients received a SAPB if an emergency physician trained in the procedure was available at the time of diagnosis. Primary outcomes were the absolute change in pain scores and percent change in expected incentive spirometry volumes from baseline to 3 hours after rib fracture diagnosis.

Results: 38 patients met eligibility criteria, 15 received the SAPB and 23 did not. The SAPB group had a greater decrease in pain scores at 3 hours (-3.7 vs. -0.9; p=0.003) compared with the non-SAPB group. The SAPB group also had an 11% (CI 1.5% to 17%) increase in percent expected spirometry volumes at 3 hours which was significantly better than the non-SAPB group, which had a -3% (CI -9.1% to 2.7%) decrease (p=0.008).

Conclusion: Patients with rib fractures who received SAPB as part of a multimodal pain control strategy had a greater improvement in pain and respiratory function compared with those who did not. Larger trials are indicated to assess the generalizability of these initial findings.

前锯肌平面阻滞可改善多发性肋骨骨折外伤患者的疼痛和肺活量:一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景:肋骨骨折是一种常见的损伤,具有相当高的发病率、长期残疾和死亡率。早期、充分的镇痛对减轻肺炎和呼吸衰竭等并发症非常重要。与全身镇痛相比,区域麻醉的副作用更小,因此被建议用于肋骨骨折疼痛控制。我们的目的是评估急诊科医生在超声引导下进行的前锯肌平面阻滞(SAPB)对多发性急性肋骨骨折患者疼痛和呼吸功能的影响:这是一项前瞻性观察性队列研究,研究对象是在一级创伤中心就诊的、有两处或两处以上急性单侧肋骨骨折的成年患者。如果在诊断时有接受过 SAPB 培训的急诊医生,符合条件的患者将接受 SAPB 治疗。主要结果是疼痛评分的绝对变化和预期激励肺活量从基线到肋骨骨折确诊后 3 小时的百分比变化:38名患者符合资格标准,15人接受了SAPB治疗,23人未接受。与非 SAPB 组相比,SAPB 组 3 小时后的疼痛评分下降幅度更大(-3.7 vs. -0.9; p=0.003)。SAPB组在3小时后的预期肺活量百分比也增加了11%(CI为1.5%至17%),明显优于非SAPB组,后者下降了-3%(CI为-9.1%至2.7%)(P=0.008):结论:作为多模式疼痛控制策略的一部分,接受 SAPB 治疗的肋骨骨折患者与未接受 SAPB 治疗的患者相比,疼痛和呼吸功能得到了更大改善。需要进行更大规模的试验,以评估这些初步研究结果的普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信