Letermovir Primary Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: Real-Life Data from a University Hospital in Argentina.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Fabián Herrera, Diego Torres, Marcia Querci, Andrés Nicolás Rearte, Elena Temporiti, Leandro Riera, Patricio Duarte, Cristina Videla, Pablo Bonvehí
{"title":"Letermovir Primary Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: Real-Life Data from a University Hospital in Argentina.","authors":"Fabián Herrera, Diego Torres, Marcia Querci, Andrés Nicolás Rearte, Elena Temporiti, Leandro Riera, Patricio Duarte, Cristina Videla, Pablo Bonvehí","doi":"10.4084/MJHID.2024.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains the most common clinically significant infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study was designed to describe and compare the incidence of untreated CMV reactivation (uCMVr), clinically significant infection (cs-CMVi) and disease (CMVd), as well as CMV-related hospitalization and outcome of allo-HCT patients, either treated with letermovir (LET) primary prophylaxis or managed with preemptive therapy (PET).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective observational cohort study of adult CMV seropositive allo-HCT patients who either received primary prophylaxis with LET within the first 100 days after HCT or were managed with PET.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population comprised 105 patients (28 in the LET group and 77 in the PET group). Compared to the PET group, patients in the LET group received more allo-HCT from alternative donors (54.5% vs. 82.14%, <i>P=0.012</i>). More than half of the patients in both groups were classified as high risk for CMVd. In the LET vs. PET group, cs-CMVi and CMVd developed respectively in 0 vs. 50 (64.94%), <i>P=<0.0001</i>, and 0 vs. 6 (7.79%), <i>P=0.18</i>. In the LET group, uCMVr occurred in 5 (17.8%) and were all considered blips. Hospital admissions related to cs-CMVi or CMVd in the PET group vs. LET group were 47 (61.04%) vs. 0, respectively, <i>P=<0.0001</i>. No differences were observed in 100-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LET primary prophylaxis proved effective in preventing cs-CMVi and CMVd and reducing hospitalizations in allo-HCT adults. Blips can occur during prophylaxis and do not require LET discontinuation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18498,"journal":{"name":"Mediterranean Journal of Hematology and Infectious Diseases","volume":"16 1","pages":"e2024039"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11178052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediterranean Journal of Hematology and Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4084/MJHID.2024.039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains the most common clinically significant infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality.

Objectives: The present study was designed to describe and compare the incidence of untreated CMV reactivation (uCMVr), clinically significant infection (cs-CMVi) and disease (CMVd), as well as CMV-related hospitalization and outcome of allo-HCT patients, either treated with letermovir (LET) primary prophylaxis or managed with preemptive therapy (PET).

Methods: This is a prospective observational cohort study of adult CMV seropositive allo-HCT patients who either received primary prophylaxis with LET within the first 100 days after HCT or were managed with PET.

Results: The study population comprised 105 patients (28 in the LET group and 77 in the PET group). Compared to the PET group, patients in the LET group received more allo-HCT from alternative donors (54.5% vs. 82.14%, P=0.012). More than half of the patients in both groups were classified as high risk for CMVd. In the LET vs. PET group, cs-CMVi and CMVd developed respectively in 0 vs. 50 (64.94%), P=<0.0001, and 0 vs. 6 (7.79%), P=0.18. In the LET group, uCMVr occurred in 5 (17.8%) and were all considered blips. Hospital admissions related to cs-CMVi or CMVd in the PET group vs. LET group were 47 (61.04%) vs. 0, respectively, P=<0.0001. No differences were observed in 100-day mortality.

Conclusions: LET primary prophylaxis proved effective in preventing cs-CMVi and CMVd and reducing hospitalizations in allo-HCT adults. Blips can occur during prophylaxis and do not require LET discontinuation.

同种异体造血细胞移植受者的来替莫韦原发性巨细胞病毒预防:阿根廷一家大学医院的真实数据。
背景:巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染仍是异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HCT)后最常见的临床重大感染,与相当高的发病率和死亡率有关:本研究旨在描述和比较未经治疗的CMV再活化(uCMVr)、有临床意义的感染(cs-CMVi)和疾病(CMVd)的发生率,以及异体造血干细胞移植患者与CMV相关的住院情况和预后:这是一项前瞻性观察性队列研究,研究对象是CMV血清反应呈阳性的成人allo-HCT患者,他们在HCT后的100天内接受了LET一级预防治疗或接受了PET治疗:研究对象包括 105 名患者(LET 组 28 人,PET 组 77 人)。与 PET 组相比,LET 组患者接受替代供体异体 HCT 的比例更高(54.5% 对 82.14%,P=0.012)。两组中都有一半以上的患者被列为 CMVd 高危人群。在 LET 组与 PET 组中,分别有 0 例与 50 例(64.94%)和 0 例与 6 例(7.79%)发生 cs-CMVi 和 CMVd,P=0.18。在LET组中,有5例(17.8%)发生了uCMVr,均被视为突发性事件。PET组与LET组因cs-CMVi或CMVd入院的人数分别为47人(61.04%)与0人(P=):结论:事实证明,LET一级预防可有效预防cs-CMVi和CMVd,减少异体HCT成人的住院率。在预防过程中可能会出现突变,但并不需要停用LET。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
113
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reciprocal interdependence between infectious and hematologic diseases (malignant and non-malignant) is well known. This relationship is particularly evident in Mediterranean countries. Parasitosis as Malaria, Leishmaniosis, B Hookworms, Teniasis, very common in the southeast Mediterranean area, infect about a billion people and manifest prevalently with anemia so that they are usually diagnosed mostly by experienced hematologist on blood or bone marrow smear. On the other hand, infections are also a significant problem in patients affected by hematological malignancies. The blood is the primary vector of HIV infection, which otherwise manifest with symptoms related to a reduction in T lymphocytes. In turn, infections can favor the insurgency of hematological malignancies. The causative relationship between Epstein-Barr virus infection, Helicobacter pylori, hepatitis C virus, HIV and lymphoproliferative diseases is well known.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信