Mechanical power during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: an observational study.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1007/s10877-024-01170-1
Tommaso Pozzi, Silvia Coppola, Giulia Catozzi, Andrea Colombo, Mara Chioccola, Eleonora Duscio, Fabiano Di Marco, Davide Chiumello
{"title":"Mechanical power during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: an observational study.","authors":"Tommaso Pozzi, Silvia Coppola, Giulia Catozzi, Andrea Colombo, Mara Chioccola, Eleonora Duscio, Fabiano Di Marco, Davide Chiumello","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01170-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) requires pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position. Our aim was to investigate the influence of the combination of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position on mechanical power and its components during RALP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-one prospectively enrolled patients scheduled for RALP were studied in supine position before surgery, during pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position and in supine position after surgery at constant ventilatory setting. In a subgroup of 17 patients the response to increasing positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) from 5 to 10 cmH<sub>2</sub>O was studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The application of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position increased the total mechanical power (13.8 [11.6 - 15.5] vs 9.2 [7.5 - 11.7] J/min, p < 0.001) and its elastic and resistive components compared to supine position before surgery. In supine position after surgery the total mechanical power and its elastic component decreased but remained higher compared to supine position before surgery. Increasing PEEP from 5 to 10 cmH<sub>2</sub>O within each timepoint significantly increased the total mechanical power (supine position before surgery: 9.8 [8.4 - 10.4] vs 12.1 [11.4 - 14.2] J/min, p < 0.001; pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position: 13.8 [12.2 - 14.3] vs 15.5 [15.0 - 16.7] J/min, p < 0.001; supine position after surgery: 10.2 [9.4 - 10.7] vs 12.7 [12.0 - 13.6] J/min, p < 0.001), without affecting respiratory system elastance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mechanical power in healthy patients undergoing RALP significantly increased both during the pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position and in supine position after surgery. PEEP always increased mechanical power without ameliorating the respiratory system elastance.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427604/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01170-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) requires pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position. Our aim was to investigate the influence of the combination of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position on mechanical power and its components during RALP.

Methods: Sixty-one prospectively enrolled patients scheduled for RALP were studied in supine position before surgery, during pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position and in supine position after surgery at constant ventilatory setting. In a subgroup of 17 patients the response to increasing positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) from 5 to 10 cmH2O was studied.

Results: The application of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position increased the total mechanical power (13.8 [11.6 - 15.5] vs 9.2 [7.5 - 11.7] J/min, p < 0.001) and its elastic and resistive components compared to supine position before surgery. In supine position after surgery the total mechanical power and its elastic component decreased but remained higher compared to supine position before surgery. Increasing PEEP from 5 to 10 cmH2O within each timepoint significantly increased the total mechanical power (supine position before surgery: 9.8 [8.4 - 10.4] vs 12.1 [11.4 - 14.2] J/min, p < 0.001; pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position: 13.8 [12.2 - 14.3] vs 15.5 [15.0 - 16.7] J/min, p < 0.001; supine position after surgery: 10.2 [9.4 - 10.7] vs 12.7 [12.0 - 13.6] J/min, p < 0.001), without affecting respiratory system elastance.

Conclusion: Mechanical power in healthy patients undergoing RALP significantly increased both during the pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position and in supine position after surgery. PEEP always increased mechanical power without ameliorating the respiratory system elastance.

Abstract Image

机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术中的机械动力:一项观察研究。
背景:机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术(RALP)需要气腹和陡峭的 Trendelenburg 体位。我们的目的是研究腹腔积气和 Trendelenburg 体位对 RALP 期间机械动力及其组成部分的影响:我们对 61 名计划接受 RALP 的前瞻性入组患者进行了研究,包括术前仰卧位、腹腔积气和 Trendelenburg 体位期间以及术后在恒定通气设置下的仰卧位。在 17 例患者中,研究了呼气末正压(PEEP)从 5 cmH2O 增加到 10 cmH2O 的反应:结果:腹腔积气和 Trendelenburg 体位增加了总机械力(13.8 [11.6 - 15.5] vs 9.2 [7.5 - 11.7] J/min,p 2O 在每个时间点都显著增加了总机械力(手术前仰卧位:9.8 [8.4 - 10.4] vs 12.1 [11.4 - 14.2] J/min,p 结论:接受 RALP 手术的健康患者在腹腔积气和 Trendelenburg 体位时以及术后仰卧位时的机械功率都明显增加。PEEP 始终能增加机械力,而不会改善呼吸系统的弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信