Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for Hypertension and Risk of Epilepsy.

IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Xuerong Wen, Marianne N Otoo, Jie Tang, Todd Brothers, Kristina E Ward, Nicole Asal, Kimford J Meador
{"title":"Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for Hypertension and Risk of Epilepsy.","authors":"Xuerong Wen, Marianne N Otoo, Jie Tang, Todd Brothers, Kristina E Ward, Nicole Asal, Kimford J Meador","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Animal and human studies have suggested that the use of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may be associated with a lower risk of incident epilepsy compared with other antihypertensive medications. However, observational data from the US are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between ARB use and epilepsy incidence in subgroups of US patients with hypertension.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used data from a national health administrative database from January 2010 to December 2017 with propensity score (PS) matching. The eligible cohort included privately insured individuals aged 18 years or older with diagnosis of primary hypertension and dispensed at least 1 ARB, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), β-blocker, or calcium channel blocker (CCB) from 2010 to 2017. Patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy at or before the index date or dispensed an antiseizure medication 12 months before or 90 days after initiating the study medications were excluded. The data analysis for this project was conducted from April 2022 to April 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Propensity scores were generated based on baseline covariates and used to match patients who received ARBs with those who received either ACEIs, β-blockers, CCBs, or a combination of these antihypertensive medications.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate epilepsy incidence during follow-up comparing the ARB cohort with other antihypertensive classes. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the association between ARB use and epilepsy incidence in various subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2 261 964 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.7 [13.9] years; 1 120 630 [49.5%] female) included, 309 978 received ARBs, 807 510 received ACEIs, 695 887 received β-blockers, and 448 589 received CCBs. Demographic and clinical characteristics differed across the 4 comparison groups prior to PS matching. Compared with ARB users, patients receiving ACEIs were predominantly male and had diabetes, CCB users were generally older (eg, >65 years), and β-blocker users had more comorbidities and concurrent medications. The 1:1 PS-matched subgroups included 619 858 patients for ARB vs ACEI, 619 828 patients for ARB vs β-blocker, and 601 002 patients for ARB vs CCB. Baseline characteristics were equally distributed between comparison groups after matching with propensity scores. Use of ARBs was associated with a decreased incidence of epilepsy compared with ACEIs (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58-0.96), β-blockers (aHR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54-0.90), and a combination of other antihypertensive classes (aHR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.95). Subgroup analyses revealed a significant association between ARB use (primarily losartan) and epilepsy incidence in patients with no preexisting history of stroke or cardiovascular disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This cohort study found that ARBs, mainly losartan, were associated with a lower incidence of epilepsy compared with other antihypertensive agents in hypertensive patients with no preexisting stroke or cardiovascular disease. Further studies, such as randomized clinical trials, are warranted to confirm the comparative antiepileptogenic properties of antihypertensive medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":" ","pages":"866-874"},"PeriodicalIF":20.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11184499/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1714","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Animal and human studies have suggested that the use of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may be associated with a lower risk of incident epilepsy compared with other antihypertensive medications. However, observational data from the US are lacking.

Objective: To evaluate the association between ARB use and epilepsy incidence in subgroups of US patients with hypertension.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from a national health administrative database from January 2010 to December 2017 with propensity score (PS) matching. The eligible cohort included privately insured individuals aged 18 years or older with diagnosis of primary hypertension and dispensed at least 1 ARB, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), β-blocker, or calcium channel blocker (CCB) from 2010 to 2017. Patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy at or before the index date or dispensed an antiseizure medication 12 months before or 90 days after initiating the study medications were excluded. The data analysis for this project was conducted from April 2022 to April 2024.

Exposures: Propensity scores were generated based on baseline covariates and used to match patients who received ARBs with those who received either ACEIs, β-blockers, CCBs, or a combination of these antihypertensive medications.

Main outcomes and measures: Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate epilepsy incidence during follow-up comparing the ARB cohort with other antihypertensive classes. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the association between ARB use and epilepsy incidence in various subgroups.

Results: Of 2 261 964 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.7 [13.9] years; 1 120 630 [49.5%] female) included, 309 978 received ARBs, 807 510 received ACEIs, 695 887 received β-blockers, and 448 589 received CCBs. Demographic and clinical characteristics differed across the 4 comparison groups prior to PS matching. Compared with ARB users, patients receiving ACEIs were predominantly male and had diabetes, CCB users were generally older (eg, >65 years), and β-blocker users had more comorbidities and concurrent medications. The 1:1 PS-matched subgroups included 619 858 patients for ARB vs ACEI, 619 828 patients for ARB vs β-blocker, and 601 002 patients for ARB vs CCB. Baseline characteristics were equally distributed between comparison groups after matching with propensity scores. Use of ARBs was associated with a decreased incidence of epilepsy compared with ACEIs (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58-0.96), β-blockers (aHR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54-0.90), and a combination of other antihypertensive classes (aHR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.95). Subgroup analyses revealed a significant association between ARB use (primarily losartan) and epilepsy incidence in patients with no preexisting history of stroke or cardiovascular disease.

Conclusions and relevance: This cohort study found that ARBs, mainly losartan, were associated with a lower incidence of epilepsy compared with other antihypertensive agents in hypertensive patients with no preexisting stroke or cardiovascular disease. Further studies, such as randomized clinical trials, are warranted to confirm the comparative antiepileptogenic properties of antihypertensive medications.

治疗高血压的血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与癫痫风险。
重要性:动物和人体研究表明,与其他抗高血压药物相比,使用血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)可能与较低的癫痫发病风险有关。然而,目前还缺乏来自美国的观察性数据:目的:评估美国高血压患者亚群中使用 ARB 与癫痫发病率之间的关系:这项回顾性队列研究使用了 2010 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月全国健康管理数据库中的数据,并进行了倾向得分(PS)匹配。符合条件的队列包括年龄在 18 岁或以上、诊断为原发性高血压且在 2010 年至 2017 年期间至少配发过一种 ARB、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)、β-受体阻滞剂或钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)的私人投保者。不包括在指标日期或之前诊断为癫痫或在开始服用研究药物前 12 个月或之后 90 天内配发过抗癫痫药物的患者。本项目的数据分析时间为 2022 年 4 月至 2024 年 4 月:根据基线协变量生成倾向评分,用于将接受 ARBs 治疗的患者与接受 ACEIs、β-受体阻滞剂、CCBs 或这些降压药物组合治疗的患者进行匹配:采用Cox回归分析评估随访期间的癫痫发病率,并将ARB群组与其他抗高血压类药物进行比较。进行了亚组分析和敏感性分析,以研究不同亚组中使用 ARB 与癫痫发病率之间的关系:在纳入的 2 261 964 例患者中(平均 [SD] 年龄为 61.7 [13.9] 岁;女性 1 120 630 [49.5%]),309 978 例接受了 ARBs 治疗,807 510 例接受了 ACEIs 治疗,695 887 例接受了 β 受体阻滞剂治疗,448 589 例接受了 CCBs 治疗。在进行 PS 匹配之前,4 个对比组的人口统计学特征和临床特征各不相同。与 ARB 使用者相比,接受 ACEIs 的患者以男性和糖尿病患者为主,CCB 使用者一般年龄较大(例如,大于 65 岁),而 β 受体阻滞剂使用者有更多的合并症和并发症。1:1 PS 匹配亚组包括 619 858 例 ARB vs ACEI 患者、619 828 例 ARB vs β-受体阻滞剂患者和 601 002 例 ARB vs CCB 患者。经倾向评分匹配后,对比组之间的基线特征分布相同。与 ACEIs(调整后危险比 [aHR],0.75;95% CI,0.58-0.96)、β-受体阻滞剂(aHR,0.70;95% CI,0.54-0.90)和其他降压类药物组合(aHR,0.72;95% CI,0.56-0.95)相比,使用 ARBs 与癫痫发病率降低相关。亚组分析显示,在既往无中风或心血管疾病史的患者中,ARB(主要是洛沙坦)的使用与癫痫发病率之间存在显著关联:这项队列研究发现,在无中风或心血管疾病史的高血压患者中,与其他抗高血压药物相比,ARBs(主要是洛沙坦)与较低的癫痫发病率相关。有必要开展进一步的研究,如随机临床试验,以确认抗高血压药物的抗致痫性比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA neurology
JAMA neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JAMA Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal for physicians caring for people with neurologic disorders and those interested in the structure and function of the normal and diseased nervous system. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry began publication in 1919 and, in 1959, became 2 separate journals: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, their names changed to JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Neurology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信