Mortality predictors in patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
João P M Bidart, Regis G Rosa, Marina Bessel, Luana G Pedrotti, Luciano Z Goldani
{"title":"Mortality predictors in patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"João P M Bidart, Regis G Rosa, Marina Bessel, Luana G Pedrotti, Luciano Z Goldani","doi":"10.1186/s12245-024-00655-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis remains a worldwide major cause of hospitalization, mortality, and morbidity. To enhance the identification of patients with suspected sepsis at high risk of mortality and adverse outcomes in the emergency department (ED), the use of mortality predictors is relevant. This study aims to establish whether quick sofa (qSOFA) and the severity criteria applied in patients with suspicion of sepsis in a monitored ED are in fact predictors of mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study among adult patients with suspicion of sepsis at the ED of a tertiary care hospital in Brazil between January 1st, 2019 and December 31, 2020. All adult patients (ages 18 and over) with suspected sepsis that scored two or more points on qSOFA score or at least one point on the severity criteria score were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total of patients included in the study was 665 and the average age of the sample was 73 ± 19 years. The ratio of men to women was similar. Most patients exhibited qSOFA ≥ 2 (58.80%) and 356 patients (53.61%) scored one point in the severity criteria at admission. The overall mortality rate was 19.7% (131 patients) with 98 patients (14.74%) having positive blood cultures, mainly showing Escherichia coli as the most isolated bacteria. Neither scores of qSOFA nor the severity criteria were associated with mortality rates, but scoring any point on qSOFA was considered as an independent factor for intensive care unit (ICU) admission (qSOFA = 1 point, p = 0.02; qSOFA = 2 points, p = 0.03, and qSOFA = 3 points, p = 0.04). Positive blood cultures (RR, 1.63;95% CI, 1.10 to 2.41) and general administration of vasopressors at the ED (RR, 2.14;95% CI, 1.44 to 3.17) were associated with 30-day mortality. The administration of vasopressors at the ED (RR, 2.25; CI 95%, 1.58 to 3.21) was found to be a predictor of overall mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even though an association was found between qSOFA and ICU admission, there was no association of qSOFA or the severity criteria with mortality. Therefore, patients with a tendency toward greater severity could be identified and treated more quickly and effectively in the emergency department. Further studies are necessary to assess novel scores or biomarkers to predict mortality in sepsis patients admitted to the ED's initial care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11181565/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-024-00655-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis remains a worldwide major cause of hospitalization, mortality, and morbidity. To enhance the identification of patients with suspected sepsis at high risk of mortality and adverse outcomes in the emergency department (ED), the use of mortality predictors is relevant. This study aims to establish whether quick sofa (qSOFA) and the severity criteria applied in patients with suspicion of sepsis in a monitored ED are in fact predictors of mortality.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study among adult patients with suspicion of sepsis at the ED of a tertiary care hospital in Brazil between January 1st, 2019 and December 31, 2020. All adult patients (ages 18 and over) with suspected sepsis that scored two or more points on qSOFA score or at least one point on the severity criteria score were included in the study.

Results: The total of patients included in the study was 665 and the average age of the sample was 73 ± 19 years. The ratio of men to women was similar. Most patients exhibited qSOFA ≥ 2 (58.80%) and 356 patients (53.61%) scored one point in the severity criteria at admission. The overall mortality rate was 19.7% (131 patients) with 98 patients (14.74%) having positive blood cultures, mainly showing Escherichia coli as the most isolated bacteria. Neither scores of qSOFA nor the severity criteria were associated with mortality rates, but scoring any point on qSOFA was considered as an independent factor for intensive care unit (ICU) admission (qSOFA = 1 point, p = 0.02; qSOFA = 2 points, p = 0.03, and qSOFA = 3 points, p = 0.04). Positive blood cultures (RR, 1.63;95% CI, 1.10 to 2.41) and general administration of vasopressors at the ED (RR, 2.14;95% CI, 1.44 to 3.17) were associated with 30-day mortality. The administration of vasopressors at the ED (RR, 2.25; CI 95%, 1.58 to 3.21) was found to be a predictor of overall mortality.

Conclusions: Even though an association was found between qSOFA and ICU admission, there was no association of qSOFA or the severity criteria with mortality. Therefore, patients with a tendency toward greater severity could be identified and treated more quickly and effectively in the emergency department. Further studies are necessary to assess novel scores or biomarkers to predict mortality in sepsis patients admitted to the ED's initial care.

一家三级医院急诊科疑似败血症患者的死亡率预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:败血症仍然是全球住院、死亡和发病的主要原因。为了更好地识别急诊科(ED)中有高死亡率和不良后果风险的疑似败血症患者,使用死亡率预测指标具有重要意义。本研究旨在确定在有监控的急诊室中对疑似败血症患者采用的快速沙发(qSOFA)和严重程度标准是否能预测死亡率:我们对 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间在巴西一家三级医院急诊室就诊的疑似败血症成人患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。所有疑似败血症的成年患者(18 岁及以上),只要在 qSOFA 评分中得到两分或更多分,或在严重程度标准评分中至少得到一分,均被纳入研究范围:研究共纳入 665 名患者,样本平均年龄为 73 ± 19 岁。男女比例相似。大多数患者的 qSOFA ≥ 2(58.80%),356 名患者(53.61%)在入院时的严重程度标准中得了 1 分。总死亡率为 19.7%(131 名患者),98 名患者(14.74%)血液培养呈阳性,主要显示大肠埃希菌是分离出的最多细菌。qSOFA 评分和严重程度标准都与死亡率无关,但 qSOFA 的任何得分都被视为入住重症监护病房(ICU)的独立因素(qSOFA = 1 分,p = 0.02;qSOFA = 2 分,p = 0.03;qSOFA = 3 分,p = 0.04)。血培养阳性(RR,1.63;95% CI,1.10 至 2.41)和在急诊室使用血管加压药(RR,2.14;95% CI,1.44 至 3.17)与 30 天死亡率有关。在急诊室使用血管加压药(RR,2.25;CI 95%,1.58 至 3.21)可预测总死亡率:尽管 qSOFA 与入住重症监护室之间存在关联,但 qSOFA 或严重程度标准与死亡率之间并无关联。因此,在急诊科可以更快、更有效地识别并治疗有更严重倾向的患者。有必要开展进一步研究,评估新的评分或生物标志物,以预测急诊科初始治疗的脓毒症患者的死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to bring to light the various clinical advancements and research developments attained over the world and thus help the specialty forge ahead. It is directed towards physicians and medical personnel undergoing training or working within the field of Emergency Medicine. Medical students who are interested in pursuing a career in Emergency Medicine will also benefit from the journal. This is particularly useful for trainees in countries where the specialty is still in its infancy. Disciplines covered will include interesting clinical cases, the latest evidence-based practice and research developments in Emergency medicine including emergency pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信