Outcomes of single- versus multi-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: Data from a multicenter randomized controlled trial of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for lung cancer

Eric Lim MD , Rosie A. Harris MSc , Tim Batchelor Bsc (Hons), MBChB, FRCS , Gianluca Casali MEDGB , Rakesh Krishnadas MD , Sofina Begum MD , Simon Jordan MD , Joel Dunning MD , Ian Paul MD , Michael Shackcloth MD , Sarah Feeney RN , Vladimir Anikin MD , Niall Mcgonigle MD , Hazem Fallouh MD , Luis Hernandez MD , Franscesco Di Chiara MD , Dionisios Stavroulias MD , Mahmoud Loubani MD , Syed Qadri MD , Vipin Zamvar MD , Chris A. Rogers PhD
{"title":"Outcomes of single- versus multi-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: Data from a multicenter randomized controlled trial of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for lung cancer","authors":"Eric Lim MD ,&nbsp;Rosie A. Harris MSc ,&nbsp;Tim Batchelor Bsc (Hons), MBChB, FRCS ,&nbsp;Gianluca Casali MEDGB ,&nbsp;Rakesh Krishnadas MD ,&nbsp;Sofina Begum MD ,&nbsp;Simon Jordan MD ,&nbsp;Joel Dunning MD ,&nbsp;Ian Paul MD ,&nbsp;Michael Shackcloth MD ,&nbsp;Sarah Feeney RN ,&nbsp;Vladimir Anikin MD ,&nbsp;Niall Mcgonigle MD ,&nbsp;Hazem Fallouh MD ,&nbsp;Luis Hernandez MD ,&nbsp;Franscesco Di Chiara MD ,&nbsp;Dionisios Stavroulias MD ,&nbsp;Mahmoud Loubani MD ,&nbsp;Syed Qadri MD ,&nbsp;Vipin Zamvar MD ,&nbsp;Chris A. Rogers PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.02.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Surgery through a single port may be less painful because access is supplied by 1 intercostal nerve or more painful because multiple instruments are used in 1 port. We analyzed data collected from the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group of a randomized controlled trial to compare differences in pain up to 1 year.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Groups were compared in a prespecified exploratory analysis using direct (regression) and indirect comparison (difference with respect to thoracotomy). In-hospital visual analogue scale pain scores were used, and analgesic ratios were calculated. After discharge, pain was evaluated using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires-Core 30 scores up to 1 year.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From July 2015 to February 2019, we randomized 503 participants. After excluding 50 participants who did not receive lobectomy, surgery was performed using a single port in 42 participants (predominately by a single surgeon), multiple ports in 166 participants, and thoracotomy in 245 participants. No differences were observed in-hospital between single- and multiple-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery when modeled using a direct comparison, mean difference of −0.24 (95% CI, −1.06 to 0.58) or indirect comparison, mean difference of −0.33 (−1.16 to 0.51). Mean analgesic ratio (single/multiple port) was 0.75 (0.64 to 0.87) for direct comparison and 0.90 (0.64 to 1.25) for indirect comparison. After discharge, pain for single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery was lower than for multiple-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (first 3 months), and corresponding physical function was higher up to 12 months.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There were no consistent differences for in-hospital pain when lobectomy was undertaken using 1 or multiple ports. However, better pain scores and physical function were observed for single-port surgery after discharge.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"19 ","pages":"Pages 296-308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624000949/pdfft?md5=a26bc67800c5e8425b43fb22f19f6484&pid=1-s2.0-S2666273624000949-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624000949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Surgery through a single port may be less painful because access is supplied by 1 intercostal nerve or more painful because multiple instruments are used in 1 port. We analyzed data collected from the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group of a randomized controlled trial to compare differences in pain up to 1 year.

Methods

Groups were compared in a prespecified exploratory analysis using direct (regression) and indirect comparison (difference with respect to thoracotomy). In-hospital visual analogue scale pain scores were used, and analgesic ratios were calculated. After discharge, pain was evaluated using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires-Core 30 scores up to 1 year.

Results

From July 2015 to February 2019, we randomized 503 participants. After excluding 50 participants who did not receive lobectomy, surgery was performed using a single port in 42 participants (predominately by a single surgeon), multiple ports in 166 participants, and thoracotomy in 245 participants. No differences were observed in-hospital between single- and multiple-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery when modeled using a direct comparison, mean difference of −0.24 (95% CI, −1.06 to 0.58) or indirect comparison, mean difference of −0.33 (−1.16 to 0.51). Mean analgesic ratio (single/multiple port) was 0.75 (0.64 to 0.87) for direct comparison and 0.90 (0.64 to 1.25) for indirect comparison. After discharge, pain for single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery was lower than for multiple-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (first 3 months), and corresponding physical function was higher up to 12 months.

Conclusions

There were no consistent differences for in-hospital pain when lobectomy was undertaken using 1 or multiple ports. However, better pain scores and physical function were observed for single-port surgery after discharge.

单孔与多孔视频辅助胸腔镜手术的疗效:视频辅助胸腔镜手术与开胸手术治疗肺癌的多中心随机对照试验数据
目的通过单个端口进行手术可能因由一根肋间神经提供通道而减少疼痛,也可能因在一个端口使用多种器械而增加疼痛。我们分析了一项随机对照试验中视频辅助胸腔镜手术组收集的数据,以比较长达 1 年的疼痛差异。方法在预先指定的探索性分析中,使用直接比较(回归)和间接比较(与开胸术的差异)对各组进行比较。采用院内视觉模拟量表疼痛评分,并计算镇痛比率。出院后,使用欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织生活质量问卷--核心 30 评分对疼痛进行评估,直至 1 年。在排除50名未接受肺叶切除术的参与者后,42名参与者采用单孔手术(主要由一名外科医生实施),166名参与者采用多孔手术,245名参与者采用开胸手术。通过直接比较(平均差异为-0.24(95% CI,-1.06 至 0.58))或间接比较(平均差异为-0.33(-1.16 至 0.51)),未观察到单孔和多孔视频辅助胸腔镜手术在院内的差异。直接比较的平均镇痛比值(单孔/多孔)为 0.75(0.64 至 0.87),间接比较的平均镇痛比值为 0.90(0.64 至 1.25)。出院后,单孔视频辅助胸腔镜手术的疼痛低于多孔视频辅助胸腔镜手术(前3个月),相应的身体功能在12个月内更高。然而,单孔手术出院后的疼痛评分和身体功能更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信