Health care access barriers among metropolitan and nonmetropolitan populations of eight geographically diverse states, 2018.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Whitney E Zahnd, Peiyin Hung, Elizabeth L Crouch, Radhika Ranganathan, Jan M Eberth
{"title":"Health care access barriers among metropolitan and nonmetropolitan populations of eight geographically diverse states, 2018.","authors":"Whitney E Zahnd, Peiyin Hung, Elizabeth L Crouch, Radhika Ranganathan, Jan M Eberth","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nonmetropolitan populations face frequent health care access barriers compared to their metropolitan counterparts, but differences in the number of these barriers across groups are not known. Our objective was to examine the differences in health care access barriers across metropolitan, micropolitan, and noncore populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from the optional \"Health Care Access\" module to perform a cross-sectional analysis examining access barriers across levels of rurality using bivariate analyses and Poisson models. Access barriers were operationalized as a count ranging from 0 to 5, reflective of the number of financial barriers and nonfinancial barriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Micropolitan and noncore respondents had lower educational attainment, were older, and were less racially/ethnically diverse than metropolitan respondents. They also reported more barriers, including lacking health insurance, medical debt, and foregoing care or medication due to cost. These barriers were most pronounced in non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and American Indian/Alaska Native nonmetropolitan populations, compared to their White counterparts. In adjusted analysis, micropolitan respondents reported more barriers compared to metropolitan (prevalence rate ratio = 1.06; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.10) as did women, racial/ethnic minority populations, and those with less education.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Micropolitan populations experience more barriers to health care, and nonmetropolitan respondents report more cost-related barriers than their metropolitan counterparts, raising concerns on health care disparities and financial burdens for these underserved populations. This underscores the need to mitigate these barriers, particularly among those in micropolitan areas and minorized populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12855","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Nonmetropolitan populations face frequent health care access barriers compared to their metropolitan counterparts, but differences in the number of these barriers across groups are not known. Our objective was to examine the differences in health care access barriers across metropolitan, micropolitan, and noncore populations.

Methods: We used Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from the optional "Health Care Access" module to perform a cross-sectional analysis examining access barriers across levels of rurality using bivariate analyses and Poisson models. Access barriers were operationalized as a count ranging from 0 to 5, reflective of the number of financial barriers and nonfinancial barriers.

Results: Micropolitan and noncore respondents had lower educational attainment, were older, and were less racially/ethnically diverse than metropolitan respondents. They also reported more barriers, including lacking health insurance, medical debt, and foregoing care or medication due to cost. These barriers were most pronounced in non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and American Indian/Alaska Native nonmetropolitan populations, compared to their White counterparts. In adjusted analysis, micropolitan respondents reported more barriers compared to metropolitan (prevalence rate ratio = 1.06; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.10) as did women, racial/ethnic minority populations, and those with less education.

Conclusions: Micropolitan populations experience more barriers to health care, and nonmetropolitan respondents report more cost-related barriers than their metropolitan counterparts, raising concerns on health care disparities and financial burdens for these underserved populations. This underscores the need to mitigate these barriers, particularly among those in micropolitan areas and minorized populations.

2018 年,八个地理位置不同的州的大都市和非大都市人口在获得医疗服务方面的障碍。
导言:与大都市人口相比,非大都市人口在获得医疗服务方面经常面临障碍,但这些障碍在不同群体中的数量差异尚不清楚。我们的目标是研究大都市、微型城市和非核心人口在获得医疗服务方面的障碍差异:我们利用行为风险因素监测系统中的 "医疗保健获取 "可选模块数据,采用双变量分析和泊松模型进行了一项横截面分析,研究了不同乡村地区的医疗保健获取障碍。就医障碍以 0 到 5 的计数形式进行操作,反映了经济障碍和非经济障碍的数量:与大城市受访者相比,小城市和非核心受访者受教育程度较低、年龄较大、种族/民族多样性较少。他们还报告了更多的障碍,包括缺乏医疗保险、医疗债务以及因费用而放弃治疗或药物。与白人相比,这些障碍在非西班牙裔黑人、西班牙裔和美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民非大都市人群中最为明显。在调整分析中,与大城市相比,小城市受访者报告的障碍更多(流行率比=1.06;95%置信区间:1.02-1.10),妇女、种族/族裔少数群体和教育程度较低者也报告了更多障碍:与大都市的受访者相比,微型城市人口在医疗保健方面遇到的障碍更多,而非大都市的受访者则报告了更多与费用相关的障碍,这引起了人们对医疗保健差距和这些服务不足人口的经济负担的关注。这强调了减少这些障碍的必要性,尤其是在大都市地区和少数民族人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信