Long-term survival of traumatic brain injury and intra-cerebral haemorrhage patients: A multicentric observational cohort

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
E. Dantan , Y. Foucher , J. Simon-Pimmel , M. Léger , M. Campfort , S. Lasocki , K. Lakhal , M. Bouras , A. Roquilly , R. Cinotti , for the AtlanREA study group
{"title":"Long-term survival of traumatic brain injury and intra-cerebral haemorrhage patients: A multicentric observational cohort","authors":"E. Dantan ,&nbsp;Y. Foucher ,&nbsp;J. Simon-Pimmel ,&nbsp;M. Léger ,&nbsp;M. Campfort ,&nbsp;S. Lasocki ,&nbsp;K. Lakhal ,&nbsp;M. Bouras ,&nbsp;A. Roquilly ,&nbsp;R. Cinotti ,&nbsp;for the AtlanREA study group","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Mortality is often assessed during ICU stay and early after, but rarely at later stage. We aimed to compare the long-term mortality between TBI and ICH patients.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>From an observational cohort, we studied 580 TBI patients and 435 ICH patients, admitted from January 2013 to February 2021 in 3 ICUs and alive at 7-days post-ICU discharge. We performed a Lasso-penalized Cox survival analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We estimated 7-year survival rates at 72.8% (95%CI from 67.3% to 78.7%) for ICH patients and at 84.9% (95%CI from 80.9% to 89.1%) for TBI patients: ICH patients presenting a higher mortality risk than TBI patients. Additionally, we identified variables associated with higher mortality risk (age, ICU length of stay, tracheostomy, low GCS, absence of intracranial pressure monitoring). We also observed anisocoria related with the mortality risk in the early stage after ICU stay.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this ICU survivor population with a prolonged follow-up, we highlight an acute risk of death after ICU stay, which seems to last longer in ICH patients. Several variables characteristic of disease severity appeared associated with long-term mortality, raising the hypothesis that the most severe patients deserve closer follow-up after ICU stay.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 154843"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944124003307","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Mortality is often assessed during ICU stay and early after, but rarely at later stage. We aimed to compare the long-term mortality between TBI and ICH patients.

Materials and methods

From an observational cohort, we studied 580 TBI patients and 435 ICH patients, admitted from January 2013 to February 2021 in 3 ICUs and alive at 7-days post-ICU discharge. We performed a Lasso-penalized Cox survival analysis.

Results

We estimated 7-year survival rates at 72.8% (95%CI from 67.3% to 78.7%) for ICH patients and at 84.9% (95%CI from 80.9% to 89.1%) for TBI patients: ICH patients presenting a higher mortality risk than TBI patients. Additionally, we identified variables associated with higher mortality risk (age, ICU length of stay, tracheostomy, low GCS, absence of intracranial pressure monitoring). We also observed anisocoria related with the mortality risk in the early stage after ICU stay.

Conclusions

In this ICU survivor population with a prolonged follow-up, we highlight an acute risk of death after ICU stay, which seems to last longer in ICH patients. Several variables characteristic of disease severity appeared associated with long-term mortality, raising the hypothesis that the most severe patients deserve closer follow-up after ICU stay.

脑外伤和脑出血患者的长期存活率:多中心观察队列。
目的:死亡率通常在重症监护室住院期间和住院后早期进行评估,但很少在后期进行评估。我们旨在比较 TBI 和 ICH 患者的长期死亡率:通过观察队列,我们研究了 2013 年 1 月至 2021 年 2 月期间在 3 个重症监护室收治的 580 名创伤性脑损伤患者和 435 名 ICH 患者,这些患者在重症监护室出院后 7 天仍存活。我们进行了Lasso-penalized Cox生存分析:我们估计 ICH 患者的 7 年生存率为 72.8%(95%CI 从 67.3% 到 78.7%),TBI 患者的 7 年生存率为 84.9%(95%CI 从 80.9% 到 89.1%):ICH患者的死亡风险高于TBI患者。此外,我们还发现了与较高死亡风险相关的变量(年龄、重症监护室住院时间、气管切开术、低 GCS、无颅内压监测)。我们还观察到,在入住重症监护室后的早期阶段,失视与死亡风险有关:结论:在这一长期随访的重症监护室存活人群中,我们强调了重症监护室留院后的急性死亡风险,这种风险似乎在 ICH 患者中持续时间更长。疾病严重程度的几个特征变量似乎与长期死亡率有关,这提出了一个假设,即最严重的患者在住进重症监护室后值得更密切的随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of critical care
Journal of critical care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
237
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice. The Journal will include articles which discuss: All aspects of health services research in critical care System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients The team approach in the OR and ICU System-based research Medical ethics Technology in medicine Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education Residency Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信