Electronic nose based analysis of exhaled volatile organic compounds spectrum reveals asthmatic shifts and consistency in controls post-exercise and spirometry.
Silvano Dragonieri, Marcin Di Marco, Madiha Ahroud, Vitaliano Nicola Quaranta, Andrea Portacci, Ilaria Iorillo, Francesca Montagnolo, Giovanna Elisiana Carpagnano
{"title":"Electronic nose based analysis of exhaled volatile organic compounds spectrum reveals asthmatic shifts and consistency in controls post-exercise and spirometry.","authors":"Silvano Dragonieri, Marcin Di Marco, Madiha Ahroud, Vitaliano Nicola Quaranta, Andrea Portacci, Ilaria Iorillo, Francesca Montagnolo, Giovanna Elisiana Carpagnano","doi":"10.1088/1752-7163/ad5864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Analyzing exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with an electronic nose (e-nose) is emerging in medical diagnostics as a non-invasive, quick, and sensitive method for disease detection and monitoring. This study investigates if activities like spirometry or physical exercise affect exhaled VOCs measurements in asthmatics and healthy individuals, a crucial step for e-nose technology's validation for clinical use. The study analyzed exhaled VOCs using an e-nose in 27 healthy individuals and 27 patients with stable asthma, before and after performing spirometry and climbing five flights of stairs. Breath samples were collected using a validated technique and analyzed with a Cyranose 320 e-nose. In healthy controls, the exhaled VOCs spectrum remained unchanged after both lung function test and exercise. In asthmatics, principal component analysis and subsequent discriminant analysis revealed significant differences post-spirometry (vs. baseline 66.7% cross validated accuracy [CVA],<i>p</i>< 0.05) and exercise (vs. baseline 70.4% CVA,<i>p</i>< 0.05). E-nose measurements in healthy individuals are consistent, unaffected by spirometry or physical exercise. However, in asthma patients, significant changes in exhaled VOCs were detected post-activities, indicating airway responses likely due to constriction or inflammation, underscoring the e-nose's potential for respiratory condition diagnosis and monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":15306,"journal":{"name":"Journal of breath research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of breath research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/ad5864","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Analyzing exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with an electronic nose (e-nose) is emerging in medical diagnostics as a non-invasive, quick, and sensitive method for disease detection and monitoring. This study investigates if activities like spirometry or physical exercise affect exhaled VOCs measurements in asthmatics and healthy individuals, a crucial step for e-nose technology's validation for clinical use. The study analyzed exhaled VOCs using an e-nose in 27 healthy individuals and 27 patients with stable asthma, before and after performing spirometry and climbing five flights of stairs. Breath samples were collected using a validated technique and analyzed with a Cyranose 320 e-nose. In healthy controls, the exhaled VOCs spectrum remained unchanged after both lung function test and exercise. In asthmatics, principal component analysis and subsequent discriminant analysis revealed significant differences post-spirometry (vs. baseline 66.7% cross validated accuracy [CVA],p< 0.05) and exercise (vs. baseline 70.4% CVA,p< 0.05). E-nose measurements in healthy individuals are consistent, unaffected by spirometry or physical exercise. However, in asthma patients, significant changes in exhaled VOCs were detected post-activities, indicating airway responses likely due to constriction or inflammation, underscoring the e-nose's potential for respiratory condition diagnosis and monitoring.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Breath Research is dedicated to all aspects of scientific breath research. The traditional focus is on analysis of volatile compounds and aerosols in exhaled breath for the investigation of exogenous exposures, metabolism, toxicology, health status and the diagnosis of disease and breath odours. The journal also welcomes other breath-related topics.
Typical areas of interest include:
Big laboratory instrumentation: describing new state-of-the-art analytical instrumentation capable of performing high-resolution discovery and targeted breath research; exploiting complex technologies drawn from other areas of biochemistry and genetics for breath research.
Engineering solutions: developing new breath sampling technologies for condensate and aerosols, for chemical and optical sensors, for extraction and sample preparation methods, for automation and standardization, and for multiplex analyses to preserve the breath matrix and facilitating analytical throughput. Measure exhaled constituents (e.g. CO2, acetone, isoprene) as markers of human presence or mitigate such contaminants in enclosed environments.
Human and animal in vivo studies: decoding the ''breath exposome'', implementing exposure and intervention studies, performing cross-sectional and case-control research, assaying immune and inflammatory response, and testing mammalian host response to infections and exogenous exposures to develop information directly applicable to systems biology. Studying inhalation toxicology; inhaled breath as a source of internal dose; resultant blood, breath and urinary biomarkers linked to inhalation pathway.
Cellular and molecular level in vitro studies.
Clinical, pharmacological and forensic applications.
Mathematical, statistical and graphical data interpretation.