Benchmarking breath analysis using peppermint approach with gas chromatography ion mobility spectrometer coupled to micro thermal desorber.

IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Dorota M Ruszkiewicz, Kristian J Kiland, Yoonseo Mok, Crista Bartolomeu, Scott A Borden, Paul Thomas, Stephen Lam, Renelle Myers
{"title":"Benchmarking breath analysis using peppermint approach with gas chromatography ion mobility spectrometer coupled to micro thermal desorber.","authors":"Dorota M Ruszkiewicz, Kristian J Kiland, Yoonseo Mok, Crista Bartolomeu, Scott A Borden, Paul Thomas, Stephen Lam, Renelle Myers","doi":"10.1088/1752-7163/ad5863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Peppermint Initiative, established within the International Association of Breath Research, introduced the peppermint protocol, a breath analysis benchmarking effort designed to address the lack of inter-comparability of outcomes across different breath sampling techniques and analytical platforms. Benchmarking with gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS) using peppermint has been previously reported however, coupling micro-thermal desorption (<i>µ</i>TD) to GC-IMS has not yet, been benchmarked for breath analysis. To benchmark<i>µ</i>TD-GC-IMS for breath analysis using the peppermint protocol. Ten healthy participants (4 males and 6 females, aged 20-73 years), were enrolled to give six breath samples into Nalophan bags via a modified peppermint protocol. Breath sampling after peppermint ingestion occurred over 6 h at<i>t</i>= 60, 120, 200, 280, and 360 min. The breath samples (120 cm<sup>3</sup>) were pre-concentrated in the<i>µ</i>TD before being transferred into the GC-IMS for detection. Data was processed using VOCal, including background subtractions, peak volume measurements, and room air assessment. During peppermint washout, eucalyptol showed the highest change in concentration levels, followed by<i>α</i>-pinene and<i>β</i>-pinene. The reproducibility of the technique for breath analysis was demonstrated by constructing logarithmic washout curves, with the average linearity coefficient of<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>= 0.99. The time to baseline (benchmark) value for the eucalyptol washout was 1111 min (95% CI: 529-1693 min), obtained by extrapolating the average logarithmic washout curve. The study demonstrated that<i>µ</i>TD-GC-IMS is reproducible and suitable technique for breath analysis, with benchmark values for eucalyptol comparable to the gold standard GC-MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":15306,"journal":{"name":"Journal of breath research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of breath research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/ad5863","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Peppermint Initiative, established within the International Association of Breath Research, introduced the peppermint protocol, a breath analysis benchmarking effort designed to address the lack of inter-comparability of outcomes across different breath sampling techniques and analytical platforms. Benchmarking with gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS) using peppermint has been previously reported however, coupling micro-thermal desorption (µTD) to GC-IMS has not yet, been benchmarked for breath analysis. To benchmarkµTD-GC-IMS for breath analysis using the peppermint protocol. Ten healthy participants (4 males and 6 females, aged 20-73 years), were enrolled to give six breath samples into Nalophan bags via a modified peppermint protocol. Breath sampling after peppermint ingestion occurred over 6 h att= 60, 120, 200, 280, and 360 min. The breath samples (120 cm3) were pre-concentrated in theµTD before being transferred into the GC-IMS for detection. Data was processed using VOCal, including background subtractions, peak volume measurements, and room air assessment. During peppermint washout, eucalyptol showed the highest change in concentration levels, followed byα-pinene andβ-pinene. The reproducibility of the technique for breath analysis was demonstrated by constructing logarithmic washout curves, with the average linearity coefficient ofR2= 0.99. The time to baseline (benchmark) value for the eucalyptol washout was 1111 min (95% CI: 529-1693 min), obtained by extrapolating the average logarithmic washout curve. The study demonstrated thatµTD-GC-IMS is reproducible and suitable technique for breath analysis, with benchmark values for eucalyptol comparable to the gold standard GC-MS.

利用气相色谱离子迁移谱仪和微型热脱附仪,采用薄荷方法对呼气进行基准分析。
背景 在国际呼气研究协会(International Association of Breath Research)内成立的薄荷计划(Peppermint Initiative)推出了薄荷协议,这是一项呼气分析基准测试工作,旨在解决不同呼气采样技术和分析平台的结果缺乏相互可比性的问题。使用薄荷进行气相色谱-离子迁移谱法(GC-IMS)的基准测试之前已有报道,但将微热解吸附(µTD)与气相色谱-离子迁移谱法(GC-IMS)联用进行呼气分析的基准测试还没有报道。 目标 为使用薄荷协议进行呼气分析的 µTD-GC-IMS 设定基准。 方法 10 名健康的参与者(4 男 6 女,年龄在 20 - 73 岁之间)通过改良的薄荷协议在纳洛芬袋中采集了 6 份呼气样本。在摄入薄荷后的 6 小时内,分别在 t = 60、120、200、280 和 360 分钟时进行呼气采样。呼气样本(120 立方厘米)在转移到 GC-IMS 进行检测之前,已在 µTD 中进行了预浓缩。使用 VOCal 对数据进行处理,包括背景减去、峰值体积测量和室内空气评估。 结果 在薄荷洗脱过程中,桉叶油醇的浓度水平变化最大,其次是 α-蒎烯和β-蒎烯。通过构建对数冲洗曲线,证明了呼气分析技术的重现性,平均线性系数为 R2 = 0.99。通过推断平均对数洗脱曲线,桉叶油醇洗脱的基线(基准)时间为 1111 分钟(95% CI:529-1693 分钟)。我们获得了 µTD-GC-IMS 的基准值(桉叶油醇洗脱),桉叶油醇的基准值为 1111 分钟(95% CI:529-1693 分钟),与黄金标准 GC-MS 相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of breath research
Journal of breath research BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
21.10%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Breath Research is dedicated to all aspects of scientific breath research. The traditional focus is on analysis of volatile compounds and aerosols in exhaled breath for the investigation of exogenous exposures, metabolism, toxicology, health status and the diagnosis of disease and breath odours. The journal also welcomes other breath-related topics. Typical areas of interest include: Big laboratory instrumentation: describing new state-of-the-art analytical instrumentation capable of performing high-resolution discovery and targeted breath research; exploiting complex technologies drawn from other areas of biochemistry and genetics for breath research. Engineering solutions: developing new breath sampling technologies for condensate and aerosols, for chemical and optical sensors, for extraction and sample preparation methods, for automation and standardization, and for multiplex analyses to preserve the breath matrix and facilitating analytical throughput. Measure exhaled constituents (e.g. CO2, acetone, isoprene) as markers of human presence or mitigate such contaminants in enclosed environments. Human and animal in vivo studies: decoding the ''breath exposome'', implementing exposure and intervention studies, performing cross-sectional and case-control research, assaying immune and inflammatory response, and testing mammalian host response to infections and exogenous exposures to develop information directly applicable to systems biology. Studying inhalation toxicology; inhaled breath as a source of internal dose; resultant blood, breath and urinary biomarkers linked to inhalation pathway. Cellular and molecular level in vitro studies. Clinical, pharmacological and forensic applications. Mathematical, statistical and graphical data interpretation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信