Lower Socioeconomic Status Predicts Greater Obstacles to Care: Using Outpatient Cholecystectomy as a Model Cohort.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
American Surgeon Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1177/00031348241262423
Michelle Y McGee, Haroon M Janjua, Meagan D Read, Paul C Kuo, Emily A Grimsley
{"title":"Lower Socioeconomic Status Predicts Greater Obstacles to Care: Using Outpatient Cholecystectomy as a Model Cohort.","authors":"Michelle Y McGee, Haroon M Janjua, Meagan D Read, Paul C Kuo, Emily A Grimsley","doi":"10.1177/00031348241262423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) are disadvantaged in terms of access to health care. A novel metric for SES is the Distressed Communities Index (DCI). This study evaluates the effect of DCI on hospital choice and distance traveled for surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Florida database was queried for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis or chronic cholecystitis who underwent an outpatient cholecystectomy between 2016 and 2019. Patients' DCI was compared with hospital ratings, comorbidities, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and distance traveled for surgery. Stepwise logistic regression was used to determine which factors most influenced distance traveled for surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 54,649 cases-81 open, 52,488 laparoscopic, and 2,080 robotic. There was no difference between surgical approach and patient's DCI group (p = 0.12). Rural patients traveled the farthest for surgery (avg 21.29 miles); urban patients traveled the least (avg 5.84 miles). Patients from distressed areas more often had surgery at one- or two-star hospitals than prosperous patients (61% vs 36.3%). Regression indicated distressed or at-risk areas predicted further travel for rural/small-town patients, while higher hospital ratings predicted further travel for suburban/urban patients.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Compared to prosperous areas, patients from distressed areas have surgery at lower-rated hospitals, travel further if they live in rural/small-town areas, but travel less if they live in suburban areas. We postulate that farther travel in rural areas may be explained by a lack of health care resources in poor, rural areas, while traveling less in suburban areas may be explained by personal lack of resources for patients with low SES.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"3024-3030"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348241262423","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) are disadvantaged in terms of access to health care. A novel metric for SES is the Distressed Communities Index (DCI). This study evaluates the effect of DCI on hospital choice and distance traveled for surgery.

Methods: A Florida database was queried for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis or chronic cholecystitis who underwent an outpatient cholecystectomy between 2016 and 2019. Patients' DCI was compared with hospital ratings, comorbidities, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and distance traveled for surgery. Stepwise logistic regression was used to determine which factors most influenced distance traveled for surgery.

Results: There were 54,649 cases-81 open, 52,488 laparoscopic, and 2,080 robotic. There was no difference between surgical approach and patient's DCI group (p = 0.12). Rural patients traveled the farthest for surgery (avg 21.29 miles); urban patients traveled the least (avg 5.84 miles). Patients from distressed areas more often had surgery at one- or two-star hospitals than prosperous patients (61% vs 36.3%). Regression indicated distressed or at-risk areas predicted further travel for rural/small-town patients, while higher hospital ratings predicted further travel for suburban/urban patients.

Discussion: Compared to prosperous areas, patients from distressed areas have surgery at lower-rated hospitals, travel further if they live in rural/small-town areas, but travel less if they live in suburban areas. We postulate that farther travel in rural areas may be explained by a lack of health care resources in poor, rural areas, while traveling less in suburban areas may be explained by personal lack of resources for patients with low SES.

较低的社会经济地位预示着更大的医疗障碍:将门诊胆囊切除术作为示范队列。
背景:社会经济地位(SES)低下的患者在获得医疗服务方面处于不利地位。衡量社会经济地位的新标准是贫困社区指数(DCI)。本研究评估了贫困社区指数对医院选择和手术距离的影响:在佛罗里达州的数据库中查询了 2016 年至 2019 年期间接受门诊胆囊切除术的无症状胆石症或慢性胆囊炎患者。患者的 DCI 与医院评级、合并症、Charlson 合并症指数和手术路程进行了比较。采用逐步逻辑回归法确定哪些因素对手术路程影响最大:共有54,649个病例,其中81个为开腹手术,52,488个为腹腔镜手术,2,080个为机器人手术。手术方式和患者的 DCI 组别之间没有差异(p = 0.12)。农村患者的手术路程最远(平均 21.29 英里);城市患者的手术路程最短(平均 5.84 英里)。与富裕地区的患者相比,贫困地区的患者更常在一星级或二星级医院接受手术(61% 对 36.3%)。回归结果表明,贫困或高风险地区预示着农村/小城镇患者需要进一步旅行,而较高的医院评级则预示着郊区/城市患者需要进一步旅行:讨论:与繁华地区相比,贫困地区的患者在评级较低的医院接受手术,如果他们居住在农村/小城镇地区,则需要前往更远的地方,但如果他们居住在郊区,则需要前往更少的地方。我们推测,农村地区路途较远的原因可能是贫困农村地区缺乏医疗资源,而郊区路途较远的原因可能是社会经济地位较低的患者个人缺乏资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信