The Diagnostic Accuracy of Claudin-4 Immunochemistry in Differentiating Metastatic Carcinomas From Mesothelial Processes in Serous Effusion Cytology: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Maria Kleinaki, Johannes A Vey, Sinclair Awounvo, Angela Ishak, Maria Arnaouti, Han Suk Ryu, Ilias P Nikas
{"title":"The Diagnostic Accuracy of Claudin-4 Immunochemistry in Differentiating Metastatic Carcinomas From Mesothelial Processes in Serous Effusion Cytology: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Maria Kleinaki, Johannes A Vey, Sinclair Awounvo, Angela Ishak, Maria Arnaouti, Han Suk Ryu, Ilias P Nikas","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0560-RA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Distinguishing metastatic carcinomas from mesotheliomas or reactive mesothelial cells in pleural, peritoneal, and pericardial effusions is a common diagnostic problem cytopathologists encounter.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To perform the first meta-analysis on the pooled diagnostic accuracy of claudin-4 immunochemistry in serous effusion cytopathology.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>This report followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for diagnostic test accuracy studies. Three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library) were searched until October 9, 2023, followed by study selection using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria and data extraction. The study quality assessment was performed by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Statistical analysis was performed by using R to calculate the pooled sensitivity and specificity of claudin-4 immunochemistry. In addition, the diagnostic odds ratio was measured, representing the odds ratio of a positive result indicating a carcinoma rather than a mesothelial process in serous effusion cytology.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Fourteen observational studies, published between 2011 and 2023, fulfilled the selection criteria and were included. All 14 studies used the 3E2C1 clone. Claudin-4 immunochemistry showed a high diagnostic accuracy in serous effusion cytology. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 98.02% (95% CI, 93.96%-99.37%) and 99.72% (95% CI, 97.36%-99.97%), respectively. Lastly, the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 1660.5 (95% CI, 760.0-3627.8) and no evidence of statistical heterogeneity between the included studies was found (I2 = 0%, τ2 = 0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Claudin-4 may be used as a single pan-carcinoma immunochemical biomarker in the differential diagnosis between metastatic carcinomas and mesotheliomas or reactive mesothelial cells in serous effusion cytology.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0560-RA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: Distinguishing metastatic carcinomas from mesotheliomas or reactive mesothelial cells in pleural, peritoneal, and pericardial effusions is a common diagnostic problem cytopathologists encounter.

Objective.—: To perform the first meta-analysis on the pooled diagnostic accuracy of claudin-4 immunochemistry in serous effusion cytopathology.

Design.—: This report followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for diagnostic test accuracy studies. Three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library) were searched until October 9, 2023, followed by study selection using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria and data extraction. The study quality assessment was performed by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Statistical analysis was performed by using R to calculate the pooled sensitivity and specificity of claudin-4 immunochemistry. In addition, the diagnostic odds ratio was measured, representing the odds ratio of a positive result indicating a carcinoma rather than a mesothelial process in serous effusion cytology.

Results.—: Fourteen observational studies, published between 2011 and 2023, fulfilled the selection criteria and were included. All 14 studies used the 3E2C1 clone. Claudin-4 immunochemistry showed a high diagnostic accuracy in serous effusion cytology. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 98.02% (95% CI, 93.96%-99.37%) and 99.72% (95% CI, 97.36%-99.97%), respectively. Lastly, the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 1660.5 (95% CI, 760.0-3627.8) and no evidence of statistical heterogeneity between the included studies was found (I2 = 0%, τ2 = 0).

Conclusions.—: Claudin-4 may be used as a single pan-carcinoma immunochemical biomarker in the differential diagnosis between metastatic carcinomas and mesotheliomas or reactive mesothelial cells in serous effusion cytology.

Claudin-4免疫化学在区分转移性癌与浆液性渗出细胞学中的间皮细胞过程方面的诊断准确性:系统综述与元分析》。
背景区分胸腔、腹腔和心包积液中的转移性癌与间皮瘤或反应性间皮细胞是细胞病理学家经常遇到的诊断问题:首次对浆液性渗出细胞病理学中Claudin-4免疫化学的诊断准确性进行荟萃分析:本报告遵循了系统综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,用于诊断测试准确性研究。在 2023 年 10 月 9 日之前,对三个数据库(PubMed、Scopus 和 Cochrane 图书馆)进行了检索,然后使用特定的纳入和排除标准选择研究并提取数据。研究质量评估采用诊断准确性研究质量评估 2 (QUADAS-2) 工具进行。使用 R 进行统计分析,计算克劳丁-4 免疫化学的集合敏感性和特异性。此外,还测量了诊断几率比,即在浆液性渗出细胞学检查中,阳性结果显示为癌而非间皮细胞过程的几率比:14项发表于2011年至2023年的观察性研究符合筛选标准并被纳入。所有14项研究都使用了3E2C1克隆。Claudin-4免疫化学对浆液性渗出细胞学的诊断准确率很高。汇总的敏感性和特异性分别为98.02%(95% CI,93.96%-99.37%)和99.72%(95% CI,97.36%-99.97%)。最后,汇总诊断几率比为 1660.5(95% CI,760.0-3627.8),未发现纳入研究之间存在统计学异质性(I2 = 0%,τ2 = 0):Claudin-4可作为单一的泛癌免疫化学生物标记物,用于鉴别诊断转移性癌和间皮瘤或浆液性渗出细胞学中的反应性间皮细胞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信