Advances in Human Leukocyte Antigen Testing Technologies and Management Strategies for Platelet Transfusion Refractoriness.

H Cliff Sullivan, P Dayand Borge, Richard R Gammon, Manish Gandhi, Mary C Philogene, YanYun Wu, Patricia M Kopko
{"title":"Advances in Human Leukocyte Antigen Testing Technologies and Management Strategies for Platelet Transfusion Refractoriness.","authors":"H Cliff Sullivan, P Dayand Borge, Richard R Gammon, Manish Gandhi, Mary C Philogene, YanYun Wu, Patricia M Kopko","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0484-RA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>The blood bank is often consulted for transfusion support of patients with suspected platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR). The workup is complex because testing includes specialized assays that are uncommonly ordered with limited availability. Add to this the variety of possible products-crossmatched platelets, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched platelets, HLA antigen-negative platelets-and the approach to PTR can be overwhelming. Moreover, most literature on the subject is published in transfusion medicine journals aimed at transfusion medicine physicians and blood bank specialists in academic settings. Resources tailored to community hospital blood banks are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To provide pathologists who may not have subspecialized training in transfusion medicine and who direct blood banks algorithmic workflows based on clinical scenario and test availability to provide appropriate transfusion support for patients with PTR.</p><p><strong>Data sources.—: </strong>This review is a comprehensive overview of terminology, HLA testing procedures, interpretations, and practical recommendations for managing PTR in various scenarios based on expert opinion as well as relevant medical literature published from 2007 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Consultation on PTR is complicated and encompasses many clinical and laboratory aspects. The lack of guidelines derived from high-quality prospective studies poses challenges in the workup and management of PTR. Hindering the process further are limited test availability, unfamiliarity with the technical assays, and the various specialized platelet products. The clinical evaluation algorithm presented herein along with the workflow pathways offer pathologists user-friendly and best-practice guidelines with different options based on the clinical scenario and the tests available.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0484-RA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: The blood bank is often consulted for transfusion support of patients with suspected platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR). The workup is complex because testing includes specialized assays that are uncommonly ordered with limited availability. Add to this the variety of possible products-crossmatched platelets, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched platelets, HLA antigen-negative platelets-and the approach to PTR can be overwhelming. Moreover, most literature on the subject is published in transfusion medicine journals aimed at transfusion medicine physicians and blood bank specialists in academic settings. Resources tailored to community hospital blood banks are lacking.

Objective.—: To provide pathologists who may not have subspecialized training in transfusion medicine and who direct blood banks algorithmic workflows based on clinical scenario and test availability to provide appropriate transfusion support for patients with PTR.

Data sources.—: This review is a comprehensive overview of terminology, HLA testing procedures, interpretations, and practical recommendations for managing PTR in various scenarios based on expert opinion as well as relevant medical literature published from 2007 to 2022.

Conclusions.—: Consultation on PTR is complicated and encompasses many clinical and laboratory aspects. The lack of guidelines derived from high-quality prospective studies poses challenges in the workup and management of PTR. Hindering the process further are limited test availability, unfamiliarity with the technical assays, and the various specialized platelet products. The clinical evaluation algorithm presented herein along with the workflow pathways offer pathologists user-friendly and best-practice guidelines with different options based on the clinical scenario and the tests available.

人类白细胞抗原检测技术的进展和血小板输注耐受性管理策略。
背景对于疑似血小板输血耐受性(PTR)的患者,血库经常需要为其提供输血支持。这项工作非常复杂,因为检测包括专门的化验,而这些化验并不常见,可用性也有限。再加上可能的产品种类繁多--交叉配型血小板、人类白细胞抗原(HLA)配型血小板、HLA 抗原阴性血小板--PTR 的处理方法可能会让人应接不暇。此外,有关该主题的大多数文献都发表在输血医学期刊上,主要针对学术机构的输血医师和血库专家。针对社区医院血库的资源十分匮乏:为可能没有接受过输血医学亚专业培训、但负责指导血库的病理学家提供基于临床情景和检验可用性的算法工作流程,以便为 PTR 患者提供适当的输血支持:本综述根据专家意见以及2007年至2022年发表的相关医学文献,对术语、HLA检测程序、解释以及在各种情况下处理PTR的实用建议进行了全面概述:PTR 的会诊非常复杂,涉及临床和实验室的多个方面。缺乏来自高质量前瞻性研究的指南给 PTR 的检查和管理带来了挑战。此外,检验项目有限、对技术检测方法不熟悉以及各种专用血小板产品也进一步阻碍了这一过程。本文介绍的临床评估算法和工作流程路径为病理学家提供了用户友好型最佳实践指南,并根据临床情况和可用检验提供了不同的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信