Identifying potential LGBTQIA+ competencies for genetic counseling student training

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Grace Saunders, Erin Carmany, Angela Trepanier
{"title":"Identifying potential LGBTQIA+ competencies for genetic counseling student training","authors":"Grace Saunders,&nbsp;Erin Carmany,&nbsp;Angela Trepanier","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.1909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The LGBTQIA<sup>+</sup> community faces considerable health disparities. Developing and integrating LGBTQIA<sup>+</sup> competencies into healthcare provider training programs is one way to promote inclusive high-quality care to potentially improve this community's health. Currently, there are no established LGBTQIA<sup>+</sup>-specific competencies for genetic counseling graduate programs (GCPs), so training across GCPs likely varies. This qualitative focus group-based study aimed to explore current topics related to genetic counseling (GC) for LGBTQIA<sup>+</sup> patients covered in North American GCPs, their learning objectives, and LGBTQIA<sup>+</sup>-specific competencies that GC students (GCSs) should achieve by graduation. Eligible participants were program leaders at ACGC-accredited GCPs and/or faculty who taught LGBTQIA<sup>+</sup>-related content in at least one GCP over the last 5 years. A semistructured interview guide was used to conduct virtual focus groups that were recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis and an inductive iterative approach that generated themes regarding what content is taught and what knowledge, attitudes, and skills GCSs should demonstrate as a result. Thirteen people participated, including nine LGBTQIA<sup>+</sup> people. They represented 12 GCPs (22% of current GCPs) across the United States and Canada. Focus groups ran 73–90 min. Transcript analysis identified six themes, framed as learning objectives (LOs), and 24 subobjectives. These included recognizing the breadth of the LGBTQIA<sup>+</sup> community and their lived experience with the healthcare system, demonstrating respect for and responding to patient identities to provide inclusive GC, employing strategies to mitigate social aspects that influence health care, and assessing personal biases and the impact of socialization. Participants used several teaching methods including didactic lectures, simulation, written activities, reflections, and fieldwork experiences. The six identified LOs may be a starting point for GCPs looking to develop or refine their LGBTQIA<sup>+</sup> curricula. Competency-based education may enhance GCSs' abilities to provide inclusive GC to the LGBTQIA<sup>+</sup> community.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.1909","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.1909","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The LGBTQIA+ community faces considerable health disparities. Developing and integrating LGBTQIA+ competencies into healthcare provider training programs is one way to promote inclusive high-quality care to potentially improve this community's health. Currently, there are no established LGBTQIA+-specific competencies for genetic counseling graduate programs (GCPs), so training across GCPs likely varies. This qualitative focus group-based study aimed to explore current topics related to genetic counseling (GC) for LGBTQIA+ patients covered in North American GCPs, their learning objectives, and LGBTQIA+-specific competencies that GC students (GCSs) should achieve by graduation. Eligible participants were program leaders at ACGC-accredited GCPs and/or faculty who taught LGBTQIA+-related content in at least one GCP over the last 5 years. A semistructured interview guide was used to conduct virtual focus groups that were recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis and an inductive iterative approach that generated themes regarding what content is taught and what knowledge, attitudes, and skills GCSs should demonstrate as a result. Thirteen people participated, including nine LGBTQIA+ people. They represented 12 GCPs (22% of current GCPs) across the United States and Canada. Focus groups ran 73–90 min. Transcript analysis identified six themes, framed as learning objectives (LOs), and 24 subobjectives. These included recognizing the breadth of the LGBTQIA+ community and their lived experience with the healthcare system, demonstrating respect for and responding to patient identities to provide inclusive GC, employing strategies to mitigate social aspects that influence health care, and assessing personal biases and the impact of socialization. Participants used several teaching methods including didactic lectures, simulation, written activities, reflections, and fieldwork experiences. The six identified LOs may be a starting point for GCPs looking to develop or refine their LGBTQIA+ curricula. Competency-based education may enhance GCSs' abilities to provide inclusive GC to the LGBTQIA+ community.

为遗传咨询学生培训确定潜在的 LGBTQIA+ 能力。
LGBTQIA+ 群体面临着相当大的健康差异。开发 LGBTQIA+ 能力并将其纳入医疗服务提供者培训计划是促进包容性优质医疗服务的一种方式,从而有可能改善该群体的健康状况。目前,遗传咨询研究生课程(GCPs)中还没有专门针对 LGBTQIA+ 的既定能力,因此各 GCPs 的培训可能各不相同。这项以焦点小组为基础的定性研究旨在探讨目前北美遗传咨询研究生课程中与 LGBTQIA+ 患者遗传咨询(GC)相关的主题、学习目标以及遗传咨询研究生(GCS)毕业时应达到的 LGBTQIA+ 特定能力。符合条件的参与者是获得 ACGC 认证的 GCP 的项目负责人和/或在过去 5 年中至少在一个 GCP 中教授过 LGBTQIA+ 相关内容的教师。采用半结构式访谈指南进行虚拟焦点小组讨论,并进行录音和转录。采用反思性主题分析法和归纳迭代法对记录誊本进行了分析,从而产生了有关教授哪些内容以及 GCS 应展示哪些知识、态度和技能的主题。共有 13 人参与,其中包括 9 名 LGBTQIA+ 人士。他们代表了美国和加拿大的 12 个全球联络点(占目前全球联络点的 22%)。焦点小组讨论时间为 73-90 分钟。对记录誊本的分析确定了 6 个主题,即学习目标 (LO) 和 24 个子目标。这些目标包括认识到 LGBTQIA+ 群体的广泛性以及他们在医疗保健系统中的生活经历、尊重患者身份并对其做出回应以提供包容性的 GC、采用策略减轻影响医疗保健的社会因素以及评估个人偏见和社会化的影响。学员们采用了多种教学方法,包括授课、模拟、书面活动、反思和实地工作经验。对于希望开发或完善其 LGBTQIA+ 课程的 GCP 来说,所确定的六个 LO 可以作为一个起点。以能力为基础的教育可以提高普通护理人员为LGBTQIA+群体提供包容性普通护理服务的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信