Cost Difference in Performing Total Knee Arthroplasty at Ambulatory Surgical Centers Compared With Hospital-Based Outpatient Departments: Observational Study.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Tommy Kim, Darren Nin, Ya-Wen Chen, David C Chang, Carl T Talmo, Brian L Hollenbeck, Ruijia Niu, David A Mattingly, Eric L Smith
{"title":"Cost Difference in Performing Total Knee Arthroplasty at Ambulatory Surgical Centers Compared With Hospital-Based Outpatient Departments: Observational Study.","authors":"Tommy Kim, Darren Nin, Ya-Wen Chen, David C Chang, Carl T Talmo, Brian L Hollenbeck, Ruijia Niu, David A Mattingly, Eric L Smith","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As total knee arthroplasty (TKA) further transitions toward an outpatient procedure, it becomes important to identify the resource utilization after TKAs at different outpatient facilities. The objective of this study was to determine the 90-day cost of patients who underwent TKAs at an ambulatory surgical center (ASC) or a hospital outpatient department (HOPD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational cohort study was conducted using the Marketscan database with patients who had a TKA at an ASC or HOPD between January 1st, 2019, and October 2nd, 2021. The primary outcome was cost in a 90-day period (including the day of surgery), with inpatient admissions and ED visits as secondary outcomes. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted, adjusting for patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population consisted of 47,261 patients with 7,874 ASC patients and 39,387 HOPD patients. 90-day costs for ASC patients were lower compared with HOPD patients ($35,634 ± 19,030 vs. $38,096 ± 24,389, P < 0.001). 90-day inpatient admission rates were lower for ASC than HOPD patients (2.5% vs. 4.8%, P < 0.001). 90-day ED visits for ASC patients were lesser compared with HOPD patients (8.9% vs. 12.7%, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with TKAs at an ASC had an overall lower cost, inpatient admissions, and ED visits over a 90-day period compared with HOPD patients. Future consideration for which outpatient facilities patients have their TKA at is necessary as TKAs shift toward bundle payments and outpatient procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"1095-1100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00698","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As total knee arthroplasty (TKA) further transitions toward an outpatient procedure, it becomes important to identify the resource utilization after TKAs at different outpatient facilities. The objective of this study was to determine the 90-day cost of patients who underwent TKAs at an ambulatory surgical center (ASC) or a hospital outpatient department (HOPD).

Methods: An observational cohort study was conducted using the Marketscan database with patients who had a TKA at an ASC or HOPD between January 1st, 2019, and October 2nd, 2021. The primary outcome was cost in a 90-day period (including the day of surgery), with inpatient admissions and ED visits as secondary outcomes. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted, adjusting for patient characteristics.

Results: The study population consisted of 47,261 patients with 7,874 ASC patients and 39,387 HOPD patients. 90-day costs for ASC patients were lower compared with HOPD patients ($35,634 ± 19,030 vs. $38,096 ± 24,389, P < 0.001). 90-day inpatient admission rates were lower for ASC than HOPD patients (2.5% vs. 4.8%, P < 0.001). 90-day ED visits for ASC patients were lesser compared with HOPD patients (8.9% vs. 12.7%, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Patients with TKAs at an ASC had an overall lower cost, inpatient admissions, and ED visits over a 90-day period compared with HOPD patients. Future consideration for which outpatient facilities patients have their TKA at is necessary as TKAs shift toward bundle payments and outpatient procedures.

非住院手术中心与医院门诊部进行全膝关节置换术的成本差异:观察研究。
背景:随着全膝关节置换术(TKA)进一步向门诊手术过渡,确定不同门诊设施的 TKA 术后资源利用情况变得非常重要。本研究旨在确定在非卧床手术中心(ASC)或医院门诊部(HOPD)接受全膝关节置换术的患者的 90 天费用:利用Marketscan数据库对2019年1月1日至2021年10月2日期间在非卧床手术中心(ASC)或医院门诊部(HOPD)接受TKA手术的患者进行了一项观察性队列研究。主要结果是 90 天内(包括手术当天)的费用,住院和急诊就诊为次要结果。在对患者特征进行调整后,进行了多变量回归分析:研究对象包括 47,261 名患者,其中有 7,874 名 ASC 患者和 39,387 名 HOPD 患者。ASC患者的90天费用低于HOPD患者(35,634美元±19,030比38,096美元±24,389,P<0.001)。ASC 患者的 90 天住院率低于 HOPD 患者(2.5% vs. 4.8%,P < 0.001)。ASC患者的90天急诊就诊率低于HOPD患者(8.9% vs. 12.7%, P < 0.001):结论:在 ASC 接受 TKAs 治疗的患者与 HOPD 患者相比,90 天内的总体费用、住院率和急诊就诊率均较低。随着 TKA 向捆绑支付和门诊手术转变,未来有必要考虑患者在哪家门诊机构进行 TKA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信