The Long-Term Benefit of Exercise With and Without Manual Therapy for Mild Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Roger Mark Engel, Peter Gonski, Subramanyam Vemulpad, Petra L Graham
{"title":"The Long-Term Benefit of Exercise With and Without Manual Therapy for Mild Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Roger Mark Engel, Peter Gonski, Subramanyam Vemulpad, Petra L Graham","doi":"10.1097/HCR.0000000000000871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by decreasing exercise capacity and deteriorating quality of life (QoL). Recent evidence indicates that combining exercise with manual therapy (MT) delivers greater improvements in exercise capacity than exercise alone in moderate COPD. The aim of this study was to investigate whether this combination delivers similar results in mild COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 71 participants aged 50-65 yr with mild COPD were randomly allocated to two groups: exercise only (Ex) or MT plus exercise (MT + Ex). Both groups received 16 wk of exercise with the MT + Ex group also receiving 8 MT sessions. Lung function (forced vital capacity [FVC] and forced expiratory volume in the 1 st sec [FEV 1 ]), exercise capacity (6-min walk test [6MWT]), and QoL (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ] and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]) were measured at baseline, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 48 wk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although there was no difference in the mean effect over time between groups for lung function (FEV 1 , P = .97; FVC, P = .98), exercise capacity (6MWT, P = .98), and QoL (SGRQ, P = .41; HADS anxiety, P = .52; and HADS depression, P = .06), there were clinically meaningful improvements at 48 wk for 6MWT (30 m; 95% CI, 10-51 m; P < .001), SGRQ (6.3 units; 95% CI, 2.5-10.0; P < .001), and HADS anxiety (1.5 units; 95% CI, 0.3-2.8 units; P = .006) across the entire cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While adding MT to Ex did not produce any additional benefits, exercise alone did deliver sustained modest improvements in exercise capacity and QoL in mild COPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15192,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000871","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by decreasing exercise capacity and deteriorating quality of life (QoL). Recent evidence indicates that combining exercise with manual therapy (MT) delivers greater improvements in exercise capacity than exercise alone in moderate COPD. The aim of this study was to investigate whether this combination delivers similar results in mild COPD.

Methods: A total of 71 participants aged 50-65 yr with mild COPD were randomly allocated to two groups: exercise only (Ex) or MT plus exercise (MT + Ex). Both groups received 16 wk of exercise with the MT + Ex group also receiving 8 MT sessions. Lung function (forced vital capacity [FVC] and forced expiratory volume in the 1 st sec [FEV 1 ]), exercise capacity (6-min walk test [6MWT]), and QoL (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ] and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]) were measured at baseline, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 48 wk.

Results: Although there was no difference in the mean effect over time between groups for lung function (FEV 1 , P = .97; FVC, P = .98), exercise capacity (6MWT, P = .98), and QoL (SGRQ, P = .41; HADS anxiety, P = .52; and HADS depression, P = .06), there were clinically meaningful improvements at 48 wk for 6MWT (30 m; 95% CI, 10-51 m; P < .001), SGRQ (6.3 units; 95% CI, 2.5-10.0; P < .001), and HADS anxiety (1.5 units; 95% CI, 0.3-2.8 units; P = .006) across the entire cohort.

Conclusions: While adding MT to Ex did not produce any additional benefits, exercise alone did deliver sustained modest improvements in exercise capacity and QoL in mild COPD.

运动配合或不配合手法治疗对轻度慢性阻塞性肺病的长期益处:随机对照试验
目的:慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的特点是运动能力下降和生活质量(QoL)恶化。最近的证据表明,在中度慢性阻塞性肺病患者中,将运动与徒手疗法(MT)相结合比单独运动更能提高运动能力。本研究的目的是调查这种组合是否能为轻度慢性阻塞性肺病患者带来类似效果:共有 71 名年龄在 50-65 岁之间的轻度慢性阻塞性肺病患者被随机分配到两组:仅锻炼组(Ex)或 MT 加锻炼组(MT + Ex)。两组均接受为期 16 周的锻炼,其中 MT + Ex 组还接受了 8 次 MT 训练。分别在基线、4、8、16、24、32 和 48 周测量肺功能(用力肺活量 [FVC] 和 1 秒用力呼气容积 [FEV1])、运动能力(6 分钟步行测试 [6MWT])和 QoL(圣乔治呼吸问卷 [SGRQ] 和医院焦虑抑郁量表 [HADS]):虽然肺功能(FEV1,P= .97;FVC,P= .98)、运动能力(6MWT,P= .98)和 QoL(SGRQ,P= .41;HADS 焦虑,P= .52;HADS 抑郁,P= .06)在不同时间段的平均效果在各组之间没有差异,但在 48 周时,6MWT(30 米;95% CI,10-51 米;PC 结论:虽然在 Ex 的基础上增加 MT 并没有产生额外的益处,但在轻度慢性阻塞性肺病患者中,单靠运动确实能在运动能力和 QoL 方面带来持续的适度改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
34.20%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: JCRP was the first, and remains the only, professional journal dedicated to improving multidisciplinary clinical practice and expanding research evidence specific to both cardiovascular and pulmonary rehabilitation. This includes exercise testing and prescription, behavioral medicine, and cardiopulmonary risk factor management. In 2007, JCRP expanded its scope to include primary prevention of cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases. JCRP publishes scientific and clinical peer-reviewed Original Investigations, Reviews, and Brief or Case Reports focused on the causes, prevention, and treatment of individuals with cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases in both a print and online-only format. Editorial features include Editorials, Invited Commentaries, Literature Updates, and Clinically-relevant Topical Updates. JCRP is the official Journal of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信