Anterior-Posterior Laxity in Midflexion After Posterior-Stabilized TKA Is Sensitive to MCL Tension in Passive Flexion: An in Vitro Biomechanical Study.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Erin E Berube, William Xiang, Joseph E Manzi, David J Mayman, Geoffrey H Westrich, Timothy M Wright, Brian P Chalmers, Carl W Imhauser, Peter K Sculco, Cynthia A Kahlenberg
{"title":"Anterior-Posterior Laxity in Midflexion After Posterior-Stabilized TKA Is Sensitive to MCL Tension in Passive Flexion: An in Vitro Biomechanical Study.","authors":"Erin E Berube, William Xiang, Joseph E Manzi, David J Mayman, Geoffrey H Westrich, Timothy M Wright, Brian P Chalmers, Carl W Imhauser, Peter K Sculco, Cynthia A Kahlenberg","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.23.01061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knee instability in midflexion may contribute to patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Midflexion instability involves abnormal motions and tissue loading in multiple planes. Therefore, we quantified and compared the tensions carried by the medial and lateral collateral ligaments (MCL and LCL) following posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA through knee flexion, and then compared these tensions with those carried by the native knee. Finally, we examined the relationships between collateral ligament tensions and anterior tibial translation (ATT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight cadaveric knees (from 5 male and 3 female donors with a mean age of 62.6 years and standard deviation of 10.9 years) underwent PS TKA. Each specimen was mounted to a robotic manipulator and flexed to 90°. ATT was quantified by applying 30 N of anterior force to the tibia. Tensions carried by the collateral ligaments were determined via serial sectioning. Robotic testing was also conducted on a cohort of 15 healthy native cadaveric knees (from 9 male and 6 female donors with a mean age of 36 years and standard deviation of 11 years). Relationships between collateral ligament tensions during passive flexion and ATT were assessed via linear and nonlinear regressions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MCL tensions were greater following PS TKA than in the native knee at 15° and 30° of passive flexion, by a median of ≥27 N (p = 0.002), while the LCL tensions did not differ. Median tensions following PS TKA were greater in the MCL than in the LCL at 15°, 30°, and 90° of flexion, by ≥4 N (p ≤ 0.02). Median tensions in the MCL of the native knee were small (≤11 N) and did not exceed those in the LCL (p ≥ 0.25). A logarithmic relationship was identified between MCL tension and ATT following TKA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MCL tensions were greater following PS TKA with this typical nonconforming PS implant than in the native knee. Anterior laxity at 30° of flexion was highly sensitive to MCL tension during passive flexion following PS TKA but not in the native knee.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Surgeons face competing objectives when performing PS TKA: they can either impart supraphysiological MCL tension to reduce anterior-posterior laxity or maintain native MCL tensions that lead to heightened anterior-posterior laxity, as shown in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":"1486-1492"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.23.01061","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Knee instability in midflexion may contribute to patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Midflexion instability involves abnormal motions and tissue loading in multiple planes. Therefore, we quantified and compared the tensions carried by the medial and lateral collateral ligaments (MCL and LCL) following posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA through knee flexion, and then compared these tensions with those carried by the native knee. Finally, we examined the relationships between collateral ligament tensions and anterior tibial translation (ATT).

Methods: Eight cadaveric knees (from 5 male and 3 female donors with a mean age of 62.6 years and standard deviation of 10.9 years) underwent PS TKA. Each specimen was mounted to a robotic manipulator and flexed to 90°. ATT was quantified by applying 30 N of anterior force to the tibia. Tensions carried by the collateral ligaments were determined via serial sectioning. Robotic testing was also conducted on a cohort of 15 healthy native cadaveric knees (from 9 male and 6 female donors with a mean age of 36 years and standard deviation of 11 years). Relationships between collateral ligament tensions during passive flexion and ATT were assessed via linear and nonlinear regressions.

Results: MCL tensions were greater following PS TKA than in the native knee at 15° and 30° of passive flexion, by a median of ≥27 N (p = 0.002), while the LCL tensions did not differ. Median tensions following PS TKA were greater in the MCL than in the LCL at 15°, 30°, and 90° of flexion, by ≥4 N (p ≤ 0.02). Median tensions in the MCL of the native knee were small (≤11 N) and did not exceed those in the LCL (p ≥ 0.25). A logarithmic relationship was identified between MCL tension and ATT following TKA.

Conclusions: MCL tensions were greater following PS TKA with this typical nonconforming PS implant than in the native knee. Anterior laxity at 30° of flexion was highly sensitive to MCL tension during passive flexion following PS TKA but not in the native knee.

Clinical relevance: Surgeons face competing objectives when performing PS TKA: they can either impart supraphysiological MCL tension to reduce anterior-posterior laxity or maintain native MCL tensions that lead to heightened anterior-posterior laxity, as shown in this study.

后稳定 TKA 术后中屈时的前后松弛对被动屈曲时的 MCL 张力敏感:体外生物力学研究。
背景:膝关节中屈不稳可能会导致患者对全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的效果不满意。中屈不稳涉及多个平面的异常运动和组织负荷。因此,我们对后稳定(PS)TKA 术后膝关节屈曲时内侧和外侧副韧带(MCL 和 LCL)所承受的张力进行了量化和比较,然后将这些张力与原生膝关节所承受的张力进行了比较。最后,我们研究了副韧带张力与胫骨前移(ATT)之间的关系:八个尸体膝关节(来自 5 名男性和 3 名女性供体,平均年龄 62.6 岁,标准差 10.9 岁)接受了 PS TKA。每个标本都安装在机器人操纵器上并弯曲至 90°。通过对胫骨施加 30 牛顿的前方力来量化 ATT。副韧带所承受的张力是通过序列切片确定的。此外,还对 15 个健康的原生尸体膝关节(9 男 6 女,平均年龄 36 岁,标准差 11 岁)进行了机器人测试。通过线性和非线性回归评估了被动屈曲时副韧带张力与 ATT 之间的关系:在被动屈曲 15° 和 30° 时,PS TKA 后的 MCL 张力比原生膝关节大,中位数≥27 N(p = 0.002),而 LCL 张力没有差异。PS TKA术后,在屈曲15°、30°和90°时,MCL的中位张力比LCL大≥4 N(p≤ 0.02)。原生膝关节 MCL 中位张力较小(≤11 N),且不超过 LCL 中位张力(p≥0.25)。TKA后MCL张力与ATT之间存在对数关系:结论:与原生膝关节相比,使用这种典型的不合格 PS 假体进行 PS TKA 后,MCL 张力更大。屈曲 30° 时的前方松弛对 PS TKA 后被动屈曲时的 MCL 张力高度敏感,而对原生膝关节则不敏感:临床意义:外科医生在进行 PS TKA 时面临着两个相互竞争的目标:他们既可以传授超生理的 MCL 张力以减少膝关节前后松弛,也可以维持原生 MCL 张力以导致膝关节前后松弛加剧,如本研究所示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS) has been the most valued source of information for orthopaedic surgeons and researchers for over 125 years and is the gold standard in peer-reviewed scientific information in the field. A core journal and essential reading for general as well as specialist orthopaedic surgeons worldwide, The Journal publishes evidence-based research to enhance the quality of care for orthopaedic patients. Standards of excellence and high quality are maintained in everything we do, from the science of the content published to the customer service we provide. JBJS is an independent, non-profit journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信