Outcomes and considerations for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the setting of multiple and large renal stones (>15 mm) in children: Findings from multicentre and real-world setting

IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2024-03-31 DOI:10.1002/bco2.357
Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Vineet Gauhar, Ee Jean Lim, Olivier Traxer, Yesica Quiroz Madarriaga, Daniele Castellani, Khi Yung Fong, Anna Bujons, Deepak Ragoori, Anil Shrestha, Chandra Mohan Vaddi, Tanuj Paul Bhatia, Cagri Akin Sekerci, Yiloren Tanidir, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh, Bhaskar Kumar Somani
{"title":"Outcomes and considerations for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the setting of multiple and large renal stones (>15 mm) in children: Findings from multicentre and real-world setting","authors":"Patrick Juliebø-Jones,&nbsp;Vineet Gauhar,&nbsp;Ee Jean Lim,&nbsp;Olivier Traxer,&nbsp;Yesica Quiroz Madarriaga,&nbsp;Daniele Castellani,&nbsp;Khi Yung Fong,&nbsp;Anna Bujons,&nbsp;Deepak Ragoori,&nbsp;Anil Shrestha,&nbsp;Chandra Mohan Vaddi,&nbsp;Tanuj Paul Bhatia,&nbsp;Cagri Akin Sekerci,&nbsp;Yiloren Tanidir,&nbsp;Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh,&nbsp;Bhaskar Kumar Somani","doi":"10.1002/bco2.357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of retrograde intra renal surgery (RIRS) in the setting of large or multiple stones in children (&lt;18 years).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective analysis was performed of paediatric RIRS cases at nine centres worldwide over a 6-year period. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 had a single stone &lt;15 mm. Group 2 had either multiple stones, maximum stone diameter of &gt;15 mm, or both. Outcomes included stone free rate (SFR) and complications within 30 days.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 344 patients were included with 197 and 147 in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Ureteric access sheaths were more frequently used in Group 2 (39.5% vs. 56.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.021). The operation time was significantly longer in Group 2 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). SFR after a single procedure was 84.7% in Group 1 and 63.7% in Group 2. Overall complication rates in Groups 1 and 2 were 7.6% and 33.3%, respectively. The most frequently reported complication in both groups was post-operative fever (4.4% vs. 14%, <i>p</i> = 0.004). The rate of Clavien I/II complications in groups 1 and 2 was 6% and 25.1%, respectively (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The rate of Clavien ≥ III complications in groups 1 and 2 was 1.6% and 8.1%, respectively (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). On multivariate analysis, total operation time, stone size and multiplicity were significant predictors of residual fragments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>RIRS can be performed in paediatric cases with large and multiple stone burdens, but the complication rate is significantly higher when compared to smaller stones.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"5 6","pages":"558-563"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.357","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of retrograde intra renal surgery (RIRS) in the setting of large or multiple stones in children (<18 years).

Materials and Methods

Retrospective analysis was performed of paediatric RIRS cases at nine centres worldwide over a 6-year period. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 had a single stone <15 mm. Group 2 had either multiple stones, maximum stone diameter of >15 mm, or both. Outcomes included stone free rate (SFR) and complications within 30 days.

Results

In total, 344 patients were included with 197 and 147 in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Ureteric access sheaths were more frequently used in Group 2 (39.5% vs. 56.8%, p = 0.021). The operation time was significantly longer in Group 2 (p < 0.001). SFR after a single procedure was 84.7% in Group 1 and 63.7% in Group 2. Overall complication rates in Groups 1 and 2 were 7.6% and 33.3%, respectively. The most frequently reported complication in both groups was post-operative fever (4.4% vs. 14%, p = 0.004). The rate of Clavien I/II complications in groups 1 and 2 was 6% and 25.1%, respectively (p < 0.05). The rate of Clavien ≥ III complications in groups 1 and 2 was 1.6% and 8.1%, respectively (p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, total operation time, stone size and multiplicity were significant predictors of residual fragments.

Conclusions

RIRS can be performed in paediatric cases with large and multiple stone burdens, but the complication rate is significantly higher when compared to smaller stones.

儿童多发性巨大肾结石(>15 毫米)逆行肾内手术(RIRS)的疗效和注意事项:来自多中心和真实世界的研究结果
目的 本研究旨在评估逆行肾内手术(RIRS)在儿童(18 岁)大结石或多发性结石情况下的疗效。 材料和方法 对全球九个中心六年来的儿科 RIRS 病例进行了回顾性分析。患者分为两组:第一组为单发结石,直径 15 毫米。第二组为多发结石,最大结石直径为 15 毫米,或两者兼有。结果包括无结石率(SFR)和 30 天内的并发症。 结果 共纳入 344 名患者,其中第 1 组和第 2 组分别有 197 人和 147 人。第 2 组使用输尿管入路鞘的比例更高(39.5% 对 56.8%,P = 0.021)。第 2 组的手术时间明显更长(p = 0.001)。第 1 组单次手术后的 SFR 为 84.7%,第 2 组为 63.7%。第一组和第二组的总体并发症发生率分别为 7.6% 和 33.3%。两组最常见的并发症都是术后发烧(4.4% 对 14%,P = 0.004)。第 1 组和第 2 组的克拉维恩 I/II 级并发症发生率分别为 6% 和 25.1%(p <0.05)。第一组和第二组的克拉维恩≥Ⅲ并发症发生率分别为1.6%和8.1%(P <0.05)。多变量分析显示,总手术时间、结石大小和多发性是残留碎片的重要预测因素。 结论 RIRS 可用于结石较大和多发性的儿科病例,但并发症发生率明显高于结石较小的病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信