The relation of lactate level and carbon dioxide pressure discrepancies between transcutaneous and arterial measurements.

Aslıhan Gürün Kaya, Şeyda Nur Özpinar, Miraç Öz, Serhat Erol, Fatma Arslan, Aydın Çiledağ, Akın Kaya
{"title":"The relation of lactate level and carbon dioxide pressure discrepancies between transcutaneous and arterial measurements.","authors":"Aslıhan Gürün Kaya, Şeyda Nur Özpinar, Miraç Öz, Serhat Erol, Fatma Arslan, Aydın Çiledağ, Akın Kaya","doi":"10.5578/tt.202402920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Partial carbondioxide pressure of the arterial blood (PaCO2) is used to evaluate alveolar ventilation. Transcutaneous carbon dioxide pressure (TcCO2) monitoring has been developed as a non-invasive (NIV) alternative to arterial blood gas analysis (ABG). Studies have shown that decreased tissue perfusion leads to increased carbondioxide (CO2). The use of transcutaneous capnometry may be unreliable in patients with perfusion abnormalities. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relation between TcCO2-PaCO2 and lactate level which is recognized as a marker of hypoperfusion.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study in critical care patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure (PaCO2 ≥45 mmHg) who received NIV between April 2019 and January 2020 in the intensive care unit were enrolled in the study. Patients' simultaneously measured TcCO2 and PaCO2 values of hypercapnic patients were recorded. Each paired measurement was categorized into two groups; normal lactate (<2 mmol/L) and increased lactate (≥2 mmol/L).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 116 paired TcCO2 and PaCO2 measurements of 29 patients were recorded. Bland-Altman analysis showed the mean bias between the TcCO2 and PaCO2 and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) in all measurements (1.75 mmHg 95% LOA -3.67 to 7.17); in the normal lactate group (0.66 mmHg 95% LOA -1.71 to 3.03); and in the increased lactate group (5.17 mmHg 95% LOA -1.63 to 11.97). The analysis showed a correlation between lactate level and the difference between TcCO2 and PaCO2 (r= 0.79, p< 0.001) and a negative correlation between mean blood pressure and the difference between TcCO2 and PaCO2 (r= -0.54, p= 0.001). Multiple regression analysis results showed that lactate level was independently associated with increased differences between TcCO2 and PaCO2 (Beta= 0.875, p< 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TcCO2 monitoring may not be reliable in patients with increased lactate levels. TcCO2 levels should be checked by ABG analysis in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":519894,"journal":{"name":"Tuberkuloz ve toraks","volume":"72 2","pages":"120-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11390064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberkuloz ve toraks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5578/tt.202402920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Partial carbondioxide pressure of the arterial blood (PaCO2) is used to evaluate alveolar ventilation. Transcutaneous carbon dioxide pressure (TcCO2) monitoring has been developed as a non-invasive (NIV) alternative to arterial blood gas analysis (ABG). Studies have shown that decreased tissue perfusion leads to increased carbondioxide (CO2). The use of transcutaneous capnometry may be unreliable in patients with perfusion abnormalities. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relation between TcCO2-PaCO2 and lactate level which is recognized as a marker of hypoperfusion.

Materials and methods: In this prospective cohort study in critical care patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure (PaCO2 ≥45 mmHg) who received NIV between April 2019 and January 2020 in the intensive care unit were enrolled in the study. Patients' simultaneously measured TcCO2 and PaCO2 values of hypercapnic patients were recorded. Each paired measurement was categorized into two groups; normal lactate (<2 mmol/L) and increased lactate (≥2 mmol/L).

Result: A total of 116 paired TcCO2 and PaCO2 measurements of 29 patients were recorded. Bland-Altman analysis showed the mean bias between the TcCO2 and PaCO2 and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) in all measurements (1.75 mmHg 95% LOA -3.67 to 7.17); in the normal lactate group (0.66 mmHg 95% LOA -1.71 to 3.03); and in the increased lactate group (5.17 mmHg 95% LOA -1.63 to 11.97). The analysis showed a correlation between lactate level and the difference between TcCO2 and PaCO2 (r= 0.79, p< 0.001) and a negative correlation between mean blood pressure and the difference between TcCO2 and PaCO2 (r= -0.54, p= 0.001). Multiple regression analysis results showed that lactate level was independently associated with increased differences between TcCO2 and PaCO2 (Beta= 0.875, p< 0.001).

Conclusions: TcCO2 monitoring may not be reliable in patients with increased lactate levels. TcCO2 levels should be checked by ABG analysis in these patients.

经皮测量与动脉测量之间的乳酸水平和二氧化碳压力差异的关系。
简介:动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)用于评估肺泡通气情况。经皮二氧化碳压力(TcCO2)监测已发展成为动脉血气分析(ABG)的无创(NIV)替代方法。研究表明,组织灌注减少会导致二氧化碳 (CO2) 增加。在灌注异常的患者中使用经皮测压法可能并不可靠。在本研究中,我们旨在评估 TcCO2-PaCO2 与乳酸水平之间的关系,乳酸水平被认为是灌注不足的标志:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,2019 年 4 月至 2020 年 1 月期间在重症监护病房接受 NIV 治疗的高碳酸血症呼吸衰竭(PaCO2 ≥45 mmHg)重症监护患者被纳入研究。研究记录了同时测量的高碳酸血症患者的 TcCO2 和 PaCO2 值。每个配对测量值被分为两组:正常乳酸(结果:正常乳酸测量值为 0)和高碳酸血症(结果:高碳酸血症测量值为 0):共记录了 29 名患者的 116 次成对 TcCO2 和 PaCO2 测量值。Bland-Altman 分析显示,在所有测量中,TcCO2 和 PaCO2 之间的平均偏差以及 95% 的一致性限值 (LOA) 分别为(1.75 mmHg 95% LOA -3.67 至 7.17);正常乳酸组为(0.66 mmHg 95% LOA -1.71 至 3.03);乳酸增加组为(5.17 mmHg 95% LOA -1.63 至 11.97)。分析结果显示,乳酸水平与 TcCO2 和 PaCO2 之间的差异存在相关性(r= 0.79,p< 0.001),平均血压与 TcCO2 和 PaCO2 之间的差异存在负相关(r= -0.54,p= 0.001)。多元回归分析结果显示,乳酸水平与 TcCO2 和 PaCO2 差异的增加有独立相关性(Beta= 0.875,p< 0.001):结论:对于乳酸水平升高的患者,TcCO2 监测可能并不可靠。结论:在乳酸水平升高的患者中,TcCO2 监测可能并不可靠,应通过 ABG 分析检查这些患者的 TcCO2 水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信